CBC Arts48%

Howie Mandel paved the way for comedians to host game shows 37%

By Sabina Wex0%

5/26/2026, 7:59:37 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Anecdotal, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 737 faulty-reasoning hits from 575 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.6% and a BS Rank of 37% (13,429 of 21,176 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the article peer group.

In 2005, Howie Mandel wanted to quit show business after another one of his television projects had failed. 
The Toronto-born comedian was done dealing with the Hollywood shenanigans. 
Then, he was asked if he would host a new game show. 
It was called Deal or No Deal, where there are 26 suitcases filled with unknown amounts of money. 
“A game show would have been the nail in the coffin of my career,” Mandel tells Q’s Tom Power. 
“If your currency was irony and comedy, you don't want to be a [game show host]. 
“So I said no, and then they called me back an hour later and they said, ‘Come on, they can't do it without you,’ and they're going to  put it in prime time, five nights in one week. 
And I go, even more of a nail in the coffin of my career.” 
But the game show producers? 
They persisted. 
One of them ended up flying out to a deli in the San Fernando Valley because Mandel happened to be there when they called him, to try and persuade him to take the job (since he refused to go to their offices). 
The game show rep even brought a cardboard cutout version of Deal or No Deal and had Mandel play it right there in the restaurant. 
“I go home and my wife, I tell her the story,” he recalls. 
“She goes, ‘So go do it. 
They're offering you money. 
You think that your career is s--t anyway, so what the hell?’” 
So Mandel took the gig. 
In December 2005, Deal or No Deal premiered. 
Mandel took a vacation to the Caribbean at that time because he was so embarrassed by the show that he didn’t want to be seen in the U.S., where he was living. 
“Then I get a call from the guy who came out to the deli saying, ‘You're not going to believe it: in the first week, 100 million people watched over the five nights.’ 
Are you kidding me?” 
Mandel says. 
“And I flew back. 
I hadn't seen it. 
I landed in Miami. 
I hadn't been in the States while it was airing. 
And within 30 seconds, the first person that laid eyes on me went, ‘Deal or no deal?’” 
Mandel thought the show would destroy his career. 
Instead, it made it  and created a whole new career path for comedians. 
After the success of Deal or No Deal, a bunch of new game shows hosted by comedians cropped up, such as Steve Harvey’s gig hosting Family Feud and Jeff Foxworthy’s role hosting Are You Smarter than a Fifth Grader? 
“All these comics that you see now doing game shows?” 
Mandel says. 
“You're welcome.” 
Listen to the full interview with Howie Mandel to hear him talk about his foray into the game show genre, how he continues to perform stand-up, and his advice to fellow entertainers. 
You can see Howie Mandel as a judge on America’s Got Talent, which launches its 21st season on June 2. 
He also will appear as a judge on Canada’s Got Talent and the host of The Price Is Right Tonight, both of which will be returning this fall. 
The full interview with Howie Mandel is available on our podcast, Q with Tom Power. 
Listen and follow wherever you get your podcasts. 
Interview with Howie Mandel produced by Catherine Stockhausen. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.8%Sabina Wex: 3.3%CBC: 2.6%Confirmation Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.1%CBC: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.5%Sabina Wex: 3.5%CBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic15.5%This article: 6.8%Sabina Wex: 1.3%CBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.8%This article: 4.3%Sabina Wex: 0.9%CBC: 0.9%Hindsight Bias4.3%This article: 0.3%Sabina Wex: 1.0%CBC: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.3%This article: 2.8%Sabina Wex: 2.3%CBC: 4.2%Framing Effect2.8%This article: 0.7%Sabina Wex: 0.4%CBC: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.7%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.3%CBC: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.3%CBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.4%Sabina Wex: 3.1%CBC: 4.0%Optimism Bias2.4%This article: 6.4%Sabina Wex: 1.7%CBC: 1.4%Pessimism Bias6.4%This article: 8.7%Sabina Wex: 5.3%CBC: 5.6%Negativity Bias8.7%This article: 2.1%Sabina Wex: 1.3%CBC: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias2.1%This article: 1.7%Sabina Wex: 1.9%CBC: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error1.7%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.1%CBC: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.4%CBC: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.5%CBC: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Sabina Wex: 4.4%CBC: 3.7%Halo Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.4%CBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.5%CBC: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Sabina Wex: 0.5%CBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.9%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.1%CBC: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.5%CBC: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.2%CBC: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.8%Sabina Wex: 2.3%CBC: 3.7%Appeal to Authority6.8%This article: 2.8%Sabina Wex: 2.2%CBC: 1.3%False Dilemma2.8%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.7%CBC: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.0%CBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.7%Sabina Wex: 5.7%CBC: 4.9%Hasty Generalization9.7%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.2%CBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.2%CBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.1%Sabina Wex: 3.3%CBC: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion2.1%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.5%CBC: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 11.1%Sabina Wex: 2.6%CBC: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.1%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.3%CBC: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.2%CBC: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.6%CBC: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.6%Sabina Wex: 4.7%CBC: 3.3%Anecdotal10.6%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.2%CBC: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 3.6%CBC: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.0%CBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.2%CBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.5%CBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.0%CBC: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.3%Sabina Wex: 1.0%CBC: 1.1%Unattributed Quote2.3%This article: 5.7%Sabina Wex: 1.3%CBC: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection5.7%This article: 1.7%Sabina Wex: 3.8%CBC: 4.8%Biased Writer Voice1.7%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 2.3%CBC: 2.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.2%CBC: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sabina Wex: 0.1%CBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 17.9%Sabina Wex: 6.2%CBC: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…17.9%

575 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker37%attributed speech364writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageHowie Mandel • 19 words • 0.0% coverageHowie Mandel • 16 words • 0.0% coverageHowie Mandel • 39 words • 0.0% coverageHowie Mandel • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageHowie Mandel • 13 words • 100.0% coverageHowie Mandel • 6 words • 0.0% coverageHowie Mandel • 4 words • 0.0% coverageHowie Mandel • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageHowie Mandel • 33 words • 100.0% coverageHowie Mandel • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageHowie Mandel • 4 words • 0.0% coverageHowie Mandel • 4 words • 0.0% coverageHowie Mandel • 4 words • 0.0% coverageHowie Mandel • 10 words • 0.0% coverageHowie Mandel • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageHowie Mandel • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageHowie Mandel • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Howie Mandel

84%flagged-word coverage
211 attributed words100% of attributed speech71% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -28.3 ptsWriter: 28.3%Howie Mandel: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+15.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Howie Mandel: 15.6%15.6%Unattributed Quote+6.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Howie Mandel: 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer Voice-2.7 ptsWriter: 2.7%Howie Mandel: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.