What Jennifer Lopez taught me about being a Missourian 25%

By Jason Rosenbaum0%

6/28/2026, 2:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 1,450 faulty-reasoning hits from 805 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.2% and a BS Rank of 25% (16,536 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the article peer group.

I've encountered some unexpected things as a Missouri political reporter. 
But I didn't expect Jennifer Lopez to prompt an existential examination into my geographical identity. 
The actress and singer caused a ruckus recently when she said earlier this month on the online show "Subway Takes" that you have to be born in New York to be considered a New Yorker: 
But I've occasionally wondered whether I can consider myself a Missourian  even though I was born in Chicago and raised in the Chicago suburbs. 
I moved to Missouri to attend college here and have remained a resident of the state for more than half of my life. 
Now, I'm sure some of you are wondering: "Jason, why does this matter? 
This is America! 
You can call yourself whatever you want." 
It matters because I'm a stickler for the facts. 
And I want to know for sure if my three kids, who were born in Missouri, are considered fourth or fifth generation Missourians. 
I have deep ties to both St. 
Louis and Kansas City, with members of my family living here since the early 1900s. 
So about five years ago, I conducted an extremely scientific survey of two Missouri politicians about whether I could call myself a Missourian. 
Then-Gov. 
Mike Parson said no. 
Former Democratic Missouri Sen. 
Claire McCaskill said yes. 
With that survey hopelessly deadlocked, I recently asked people on social media whether you had to be born in Missouri to be considered a Missourian. 
And the response was  mixed. 
St. 
Louis resident Kate Stowe contended that we "should be welcoming people, not drawing lines around who's 'Missourian' enough." 
And she may have a point. 
When politicians have to stress that they're fourth or fifth or sixth or seventh generation Missourians, it does give the impression that only people with deep bloodlines are qualified for elected office. 
Others, though, are fine identifying from where they previously lived. 
Christy McVicker Ryan of St. 
Louis wrote: "I've been living in St Louis for over a decade, but I'll never be from here. 
I am choosing to live and raise my family here (happily!) 
and I think that choice gives people like me a voice in our home." 
Calling in an expert 
After the social media callout didn't provide a definitive answer, I contacted someone who knew my struggle: My longtime colleague Jo Mannies. 
Like me, Mannies has lived in Missouri for more than half of her life. 
But she has extensive ties to Indiana  so much so that I often call Jo one of the most prominent Hoosiers. 
"When you think about your formative years when you grew up  for some people that has a stronger impact on their lives because that shaped who they are," Mannies said. 
"I have to say Indiana, in that sense, because I was born and raised in Indiana, and I went to college in Indiana, and my first newspaper job was in Indiana." 
In fact, Mannies' father was so well-known as a high school basketball coach that political heavyweights like Birch Bayh knew his name. 
She added that Indiana politicians often played up their longstanding ties to the state, much like Missouri elected officials brag about how they're fifth, sixth or seventh generation residents. 
"I think it's true in a lot of states where politicians who want to get elected to office do want the public to think they are one of them, even if they weren't one of them all of their lives, especially their younger years," Mannies said. 
Mannies contends that I'm probably a "hybrid Missourian," since I spent my formative years growing up in Illinois. 
And I was tempted to accept her decision. 
But to me, being a Missourian means that you've made a tangible investment in where the state goes into the future  even if the state's people or governmental leaders occasionally disappoint you. 
Being a Missourian provides you with motivation to help push Missouri in a better direction. 
And not just for yourself, but for your neighbors, your friends and your children. 
So even though it would be easiest to say I'm a Missourian who was born in Illinois, the fact remains that I live in Missouri. 
I vote in Missouri. 
I go on vacations in Missouri. 
I hike at Missouri state parks. 
And I hope to spend the rest of my life in Missouri. 
Whatever J-Lo thinks about New Yorkers  I am a Missourian. 
"St. 
Louis on the Air" brings you the stories of St. 
Louis and the people who live, work and create in our region. 
The show is produced by Miya Norfleet, Emily Woodbury, Danny Wicentowski, Elaine Cha and Alex Heuer. 
Layla Halilbasicis our production assistant. 
The audio engineer is Aaron Doerr. 
Copyright 2026 St. 
Louis Public Radio 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.4%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.4%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias8.4%This article: 2.2%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias2.2%This article: 4.6%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.3%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic4.6%This article: 9.6%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic9.6%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.8%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias4.0%This article: 1.5%Jason Rosenbaum: 8.6%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect1.5%This article: 4.1%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion4.1%This article: 4.1%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.1%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.6%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Jason Rosenbaum: 6.7%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias5.2%This article: 6.7%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.5%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias6.7%This article: 6.7%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error6.7%This article: 1.7%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias1.7%This article: 4.8%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias4.8%This article: 1.2%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.2%This article: 7.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect7.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.8%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias8.8%This article: 1.6%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect1.6%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.0%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority12.0%This article: 4.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.6%Columbia Missourian: 1.1%False Dilemma4.0%This article: 3.6%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Slippery Slope3.6%This article: 1.9%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning1.9%This article: 12.5%Jason Rosenbaum: 4.9%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization12.5%This article: 1.6%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring1.6%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.8%Jason Rosenbaum: 7.2%Columbia Missourian: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion9.8%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.9%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.0%This article: 1.4%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque1.4%This article: 2.9%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof2.9%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 13.5%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.5%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal13.5%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.1%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.1%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.7%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.7%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 4.3%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection4.3%This article: 8.8%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.9%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice8.8%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.8%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.5%

805 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers24%attributed speech612writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageMike Parson • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageClaire McCaskill • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageKate Stowe • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageChristy McVicker Ryan • 18 words • 0.0% coverageChristy McVicker Ryan • 11 words • 0.0% coverageChristy McVicker Ryan • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJo Mannies • 31 words • 0.0% coverageJo Mannies • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageJo Mannies • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageSt. Louis Public Radio • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jo Mannies

100%flagged-word coverage
108 attributed words56% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-11.6 ptsWriter: 11.6%Jo Mannies: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-5.7 ptsWriter: 5.7%Jo Mannies: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.0 ptsWriter: 2.0%Jo Mannies: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.