Truthout74%

Trump Misquoted Declaration, Reciting Bible Passage Instead in July 4th Speech 38%

By Chris Walker53%

7/6/2026, 8:41:55 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 1,192 faulty-reasoning hits from 458 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.3% and a BS Rank of 38% (12,821 of 20,514 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 62.50% of the article peer group.

In a speech during Independence Day celebrations in Washington, D.C. on Saturday night, President Donald Trump misquoted the U.S. 
Declaration of Independence, falsely claiming it contained deep religious overtones. 
“As our Declaration of Independence tells us, we are all made in the image of one almighty god,” Trump said during the speech, referring to a concept that appears in the Book of Genesis. 
The Declaration of Independence makes no reference to Americans (or anyone) being created “in the image” of a god. 
The document includes only one mention of the word “god,” stating that all people are subject to “the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God.” 
The phrase “nature’s God” has long been understood by historians to be a term deists used in the late 18th century to refer to whatever universal force created the universe  not necessarily a Christian god. 
“Nature’s God is…a ‘deity’ that operates entirely through laws  natural laws  that are explicable,” explained historian Matthew Stewart, author of the book “Nature’s God: The Heretical Origins of the American Republic,” in an NPR interview from 2014. 
“And we have to approach this ‘god’ through the study of nature and also evidence and experience. 
So it’s a dramatically different kind of deity from that you find in most revealed religions.” 
Notably, the U.S. 
Constitution, the country’s foundational governing document, doesn’t refer to any god at all, and explicitly forbids religious tests for those seeking political office. 
The First Amendment to the Constitution also bars the federal government (and state governments, through the 14th Amendment) from establishing an official religion. 
Trump’s remark could be viewed as a gaffe  but it could also be interpreted as a signal to his Christian nationalist base that he aims to push the country into a more theological direction (so long as that theology is aligned with his goals). 
Indeed, the president used the word “god” multiple times in his Fourth of July speech. 
Trump wasn’t the only political leader to make erroneous references to religion and the nation’s founding on Independence Day. 
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) posted on social media that “The founding fathers called America ‘God’s noble experiment.’ 
There is no historical evidence that any founder ever called the U.S. 
“God’s noble experiment.” 
“It’s disturbing to see any American politician fabricate  apparently from whole cloth  a quotation that is indistinguishable from the junk history being pushed by…the White Christian Nationalist movement,” Nick Fish, president of American Atheists, said in a statement responding to Schumer’s post. 
“It’s particularly galling in the wake of Christian Nationalist hijacking of our nation’s 250th anniversary and their attempts to redefine America in stark, exclusionary terms.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 22.9%Chris Walker: 6.1%Truthout: 5.8%Confirmation Bias22.9%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 1.0%Truthout: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Chris Walker: 3.0%Truthout: 3.3%Availability Heuristic3.3%This article: 7.9%Chris Walker: 1.3%Truthout: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic7.9%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.7%Truthout: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 2.1%Truthout: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Chris Walker: 5.6%Truthout: 10.0%Framing Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.8%Truthout: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.3%Truthout: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.5%Truthout: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.6%Truthout: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Chris Walker: 1.8%Truthout: 2.3%Pessimism Bias3.5%This article: 27.1%Chris Walker: 9.6%Truthout: 12.1%Negativity Bias27.1%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 1.4%Truthout: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%Chris Walker: 1.2%Truthout: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error9.8%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 15.3%Chris Walker: 2.1%Truthout: 1.9%In-Group Bias15.3%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.6%Truthout: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.5%Truthout: 1.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.1%Chris Walker: 1.5%Truthout: 1.1%Recency Bias4.1%This article: 8.5%Chris Walker: 0.2%Truthout: 0.3%Primacy Effect8.5%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Chris Walker: 1.5%Truthout: 1.6%Ad Hominem9.6%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.7%Truthout: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.4%Chris Walker: 3.0%Truthout: 3.7%Appeal to Authority16.4%This article: 9.8%Chris Walker: 1.4%Truthout: 1.9%False Dilemma9.8%This article: 15.3%Chris Walker: 1.2%Truthout: 1.6%Slippery Slope15.3%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.6%Chris Walker: 5.8%Truthout: 7.7%Hasty Generalization7.6%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.2%Truthout: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.7%Truthout: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.1%Chris Walker: 6.9%Truthout: 8.6%Appeal to Emotion15.1%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 1.4%Truthout: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 2.6%Truthout: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.0%Truthout: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 14.6%Chris Walker: 0.7%Truthout: 0.8%Burden of Proof14.6%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.6%Chris Walker: 1.7%Truthout: 2.8%Anecdotal9.6%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.0%Truthout: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.2%Chris Walker: 1.9%Truthout: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.2%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.0%Truthout: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.0%Truthout: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.2%Truthout: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.1%Truthout: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.8%Chris Walker: 1.8%Truthout: 1.5%Unattributed Quote11.8%This article: 10.5%Chris Walker: 1.8%Truthout: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection10.5%This article: 13.5%Chris Walker: 6.0%Truthout: 9.4%Biased Writer Voice13.5%This article: 9.8%Chris Walker: 2.8%Truthout: 2.9%Indoctrination9.8%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 5.7%Truthout: 7.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Walker: 0.4%Truthout: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Chris Walker: 3.8%Truthout: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.6%

458 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers43%attributed speech263writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageMatthew Stewart • 39 words • 0.0% coverageMatthew Stewart • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMatthew Stewart • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageChuck Schumer • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageNick Fish • 44 words • 100.0% coverageNick Fish • 25 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Nick Fish

100%flagged-word coverage
69 attributed words35% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +63.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Nick Fish: 63.8%63.8%Biased Writer Voice-23.6 ptsWriter: 23.6%Nick Fish: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-17.1 ptsWriter: 17.1%Nick Fish: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-5.3 ptsWriter: 5.3%Nick Fish: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.