Truthout74%

Mamdani Unveils New Rule to Crack Down on Junk Fees and Subscription Scams 73%

By Brett Wilkins82%

7/11/2026, 1:51:12 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 52.4% saturation with 355 hits. Analysis detected 2,540 faulty-reasoning hits from 677 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (6,057 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the article peer group.

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani lights the Empire State Building on July 4, 2026, in New York City. 
John Nacion / Getty Images for Empire State Realty Trust 
In a move proponents say will save constituents up to $162.5 million annually, Mayor Zohran Mamdani and other New York City officials on Friday unveiled a “click-to-cancel” rule aimed at ensuring people can end online subscriptions as easily as they start them. 
Days after entering office in January, Mamdani signed a pair of executive orders,  Combating Hidden Junk Fees  and  Fighting Subscription Tricks and Traps   his 9th and 10th mayoral edicts  to protect consumers and make it easier “for New Yorkers to know the real price of what they are buying and to stop paying for the services they no longer want.” 
Following up on the orders, Mamdani and New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection (DCWP) Commissioner Samuel A.A. 
Levine proposed a rule “requiring transparent, all-in pricing that bans hidden junk fees, alongside a final ‘click to cancel’ rule that guarantees consumers can cancel subscriptions as easily as they sign up for them.” 
The landmark proposal is part of Mamdani’s affordability agenda, which includes the rent freeze and universal childcare programs he’s partially enacted, as well as the free city buses, municipal grocery stores, affordable housing expansion, and redistributive taxation his administration is pursuing. 
“For years, companies have built their business model around making it harder for working people to hold onto their money,” Mamdani said during a Friday press conference at Asser Levy Recreational Center in Manhattan’s Kips Bay neighborhood. 
“Whether it’s hidden fees that suddenly appear at checkout or subscriptions that take one click to sign up for and a dozen steps to cancel, the result is the same: Working people pay more while corporations profit. 
That ends now. 
If you can sign up with one click, you can cancel with one click.” 
Levine said that “these two rules will ensure that the price you see is the price you pay  no hidden charges, no endless subscription services, and no advantages for businesses that cheat. 
Requiring companies to compete on price will lower costs for all New Yorkers and level the playing field for honest businesses.” 
Deputy Mayor for Economic Justice Julie Su spoke at the press conference, saying, “Every dollar a family loses to a hidden fee or a subscription they couldn’t cancel is a dollar stolen from them, a dollar that could have gone toward rent, groceries, childcare, or anything else.” 
“And just as important, the hours spent trying to cancel a subscription or membership you no longer want is stolen time,” the former acting US labor secretary added. 
“That’s what affordability means in practice  closing the small holes that drain people’s paychecks and their time month after month. 
These rules put New Yorkers back in control.” 
Former Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan  who implemented a similar rule while serving in the role during the Biden administration before it was killed after President Donald Trump returned to office  also spoke Friday, arguing that “nobody should be trapped in subscriptions they can’t escape or stuck paying junk fees they can’t avoid.” 
“These predatory tactics cheat people out of billions of dollars each year,” she added. 
“With today’s rules, Commissioner Levine and DCWP are cracking down on corporate ripoffs, protecting families and honest businesses alike. 
The Mamdani administration’s work to tackle the affordability crisis and promote economic fairness continues to set a new standard nationwide, modeling effective governance and a relentless focus on using all of the city’s levers to improve life for New Yorkers.” 
Media that fights fascism 
Truthout is funded almost entirely by readers  that’s why we can speak truth to power and cut against the mainstream narrative. 
But independent journalists at Truthout face mounting political repression under Trump. 
We rely on your support to survive McCarthyist censorship. 
Please make a tax-deductible one-time or monthly donation. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 5.2%Truthout: 5.8%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 0.5%Truthout: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 5.3%Truthout: 3.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 1.1%Truthout: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 0.7%Truthout: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Brett Wilkins: 1.5%Truthout: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias4.9%This article: 25.8%Brett Wilkins: 15.9%Truthout: 10.0%Framing Effect25.8%This article: 12.4%Brett Wilkins: 2.4%Truthout: 0.5%Loss Aversion12.4%This article: 7.2%Brett Wilkins: 0.6%Truthout: 0.4%Status Quo Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 0.0%Truthout: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 15.7%Brett Wilkins: 3.0%Truthout: 1.0%Optimism Bias15.7%This article: 9.6%Brett Wilkins: 0.8%Truthout: 2.3%Pessimism Bias9.6%This article: 44.0%Brett Wilkins: 26.7%Truthout: 12.2%Negativity Bias44.0%This article: 3.2%Brett Wilkins: 0.3%Truthout: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias3.2%This article: 5.5%Brett Wilkins: 1.0%Truthout: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error5.5%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 0.6%Truthout: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%Brett Wilkins: 2.1%Truthout: 1.9%In-Group Bias10.3%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 5.4%Truthout: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 15.1%Brett Wilkins: 2.8%Truthout: 1.0%Halo Effect15.1%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 1.3%Truthout: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 0.0%Truthout: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.3%Brett Wilkins: 2.8%Truthout: 1.2%Recency Bias8.3%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 0.4%Truthout: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 0.0%Truthout: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 2.1%Truthout: 1.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 0.0%Truthout: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.3%Brett Wilkins: 6.4%Truthout: 3.7%Appeal to Authority8.3%This article: 10.5%Brett Wilkins: 3.3%Truthout: 1.9%False Dilemma10.5%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 0.1%Truthout: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 3.2%Brett Wilkins: 0.3%Truthout: 0.3%Circular Reasoning3.2%This article: 13.0%Brett Wilkins: 7.8%Truthout: 7.7%Hasty Generalization13.0%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 1.9%Truthout: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 1.4%Truthout: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 52.4%Brett Wilkins: 19.4%Truthout: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion52.4%This article: 14.6%Brett Wilkins: 2.4%Truthout: 1.7%Begging the Question14.6%This article: 15.8%Brett Wilkins: 4.8%Truthout: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)15.8%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 0.0%Truthout: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.3%Brett Wilkins: 0.9%Truthout: 0.8%Burden of Proof1.3%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 0.7%Truthout: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 6.1%Brett Wilkins: 0.5%Truthout: 0.4%Composition/Division6.1%This article: 12.9%Brett Wilkins: 4.5%Truthout: 2.7%Anecdotal12.9%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 0.6%Truthout: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.1%Brett Wilkins: 1.0%Truthout: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.1%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 0.0%Truthout: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 0.4%Truthout: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 0.0%Truthout: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 0.0%Truthout: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 0.0%Truthout: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.0%Brett Wilkins: 2.8%Truthout: 1.5%Unattributed Quote5.0%This article: 10.3%Brett Wilkins: 3.7%Truthout: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection10.3%This article: 14.5%Brett Wilkins: 11.2%Truthout: 9.5%Biased Writer Voice14.5%This article: 14.0%Brett Wilkins: 3.9%Truthout: 2.9%Indoctrination14.0%This article: 23.3%Brett Wilkins: 13.4%Truthout: 7.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias23.3%This article: 0.0%Brett Wilkins: 0.1%Truthout: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Brett Wilkins: 1.4%Truthout: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.8%

677 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers55%attributed speech305writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 66 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel A.A. Levine • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 37 words • 100.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 37 words • 0.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 3 words • 0.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSamuel A.A. Levine • 33 words • 100.0% coverageSamuel A.A. Levine • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Su • 47 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Su • 28 words • 0.0% coverageJulie Su • 21 words • 100.0% coverageJulie Su • 8 words • 0.0% coverageLina Khan • 56 words • 0.0% coverageLina Khan • 14 words • 0.0% coverageLina Khan • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lina Khan

100%flagged-word coverage
89 attributed words24% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Politically Left Leaning B-51.8 ptsWriter: 51.8%Lina Khan: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-24.3 ptsWriter: 24.3%Lina Khan: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-21.0 ptsWriter: 21.0%Lina Khan: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -12.8 ptsWriter: 12.8%Lina Khan: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.