Truthout74%

Day After Threat to Put Fees on Strait of Hormuz, Trump Says He Denounces Idea 64%

By Sharon Zhang79%

7/14/2026, 2:17:28 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.5% saturation with 208 hits. Analysis detected 1,384 faulty-reasoning hits from 501 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 58.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (7,955 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 63.70% of the article peer group.

U.S. 
President Donald Trump has swiftly backtracked his threat to impose a 20 percent fee on cargo that passes through the Strait of Hormuz, calling off the plan just a day after he announced it  and claiming that, in fact, he never supported such an idea. 
Instead of the proposed 20 percent fee, the U.S. will be granted economic deals with other countries in the region in exchange for passage through the strait, Trump said, without providing any specifics. 
“Based on highly productive conversations with Middle East leadership, I have decided to replace the 20% United States Reimbursement Fee with Trade and Investment Deals that the various Gulf States will be making into the United States,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social. 
“Those Investments will be MASSIVE but, at the same time, extraordinarily good for them, and their future.” 
It’s unclear what investments Trump is referring to. 
Speaking to reporters in the White House on Tuesday, Trump said that he “was called by different people, different countries, kings and emirs” after his announcement on Monday morning. 
However, the Trump administration did not announce new major economic deals with Persian Gulf nations at the time that Trump announced his reversal. 
Trump declared on Monday that the U.S. would, from then on, be known as the “guardian of the Hormuz Strait,” a seemingly unilateral declaration. 
He said that the U.S. would impose a 20 percent fee on cargo that passed through the strait, while the military would reimpose its blockade on Iranian ships. 
The blockade was initially lifted during the short-lived “memorandum of understanding” between Iran and the U.S. that began in June. 
The logistics of Trump’s fee and guardianship plan were unclear, and directly contradicted the position of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who said late last month that “no country is allowed” to charge fees on transit through the strait under international law. 
The president echoed that sentiment after he backtracked on Tuesday. 
Speaking of the supposed investments at the White House on Tuesday, Trump said, “I like that, actually, because I don’t think anybody should be able to charge a fee for the strait or for any other strait relationship in terms of other sections of the world.” 
“But we were doing it as a reimbursement,” he added. 
After Trump’s announcement on Monday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that he agreed that countries “should be compensated” for passage through the strait. 
“Iran has always been the GUARDIAN of the Strait and will remain so FOREVER. 20% is of course too much. 
We will be fair,” he said, making light of Trump’s threat in a post on social media. 
The U.S. has continued its bombardments of Iran this week, hitting yet more sites across Iran on Tuesday as Iran retaliated on U.S. assets in surrounding states. 
Experts have warned that escalation may be inevitable as long as the level of strikes continues. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.0%Sharon Zhang: 7.6%Truthout: 5.8%Confirmation Bias13.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 1.2%Truthout: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.6%Sharon Zhang: 4.8%Truthout: 3.4%Availability Heuristic15.6%This article: 4.8%Sharon Zhang: 0.5%Truthout: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic4.8%This article: 2.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.2%Truthout: 0.4%Hindsight Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 1.5%Truthout: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%Sharon Zhang: 13.5%Truthout: 10.0%Framing Effect11.2%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.3%Truthout: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.3%Truthout: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.7%Truthout: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.4%Sharon Zhang: 0.8%Truthout: 1.0%Optimism Bias12.4%This article: 3.2%Sharon Zhang: 2.5%Truthout: 2.3%Pessimism Bias3.2%This article: 39.7%Sharon Zhang: 21.3%Truthout: 12.2%Negativity Bias39.7%This article: 6.0%Sharon Zhang: 2.0%Truthout: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 2.3%Truthout: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.1%Truthout: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 2.4%Truthout: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 2.3%Truthout: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Sharon Zhang: 0.6%Truthout: 1.0%Halo Effect3.4%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 1.0%Truthout: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.0%Truthout: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 12.2%Sharon Zhang: 2.7%Truthout: 1.2%Recency Bias12.2%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.6%Truthout: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.2%Truthout: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Sharon Zhang: 2.5%Truthout: 1.6%Ad Hominem3.4%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 1.0%Truthout: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 30.3%Sharon Zhang: 5.3%Truthout: 3.7%Appeal to Authority30.3%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 1.5%Truthout: 1.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 3.2%Sharon Zhang: 1.8%Truthout: 1.5%Slippery Slope3.2%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.2%Truthout: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 10.1%Truthout: 7.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.9%Truthout: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.4%Truthout: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.2%Sharon Zhang: 11.4%Truthout: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion9.2%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 1.7%Truthout: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.4%Sharon Zhang: 2.9%Truthout: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.4%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.1%Truthout: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.6%Sharon Zhang: 2.0%Truthout: 0.8%Burden of Proof6.6%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.0%Truthout: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.3%Truthout: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.4%Sharon Zhang: 1.2%Truthout: 2.7%Anecdotal3.4%This article: 2.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.1%Truthout: 0.1%No True Scotsman2.0%This article: 33.1%Sharon Zhang: 3.2%Truthout: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)33.1%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.0%Truthout: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.4%Truthout: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.4%Truthout: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.3%Truthout: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 1.2%Truthout: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.8%Sharon Zhang: 3.0%Truthout: 1.5%Unattributed Quote9.8%This article: 3.0%Sharon Zhang: 2.2%Truthout: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection3.0%This article: 41.5%Sharon Zhang: 15.2%Truthout: 9.5%Biased Writer Voice41.5%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 1.9%Truthout: 2.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 8.6%Truthout: 7.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.7%Truthout: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 2.6%Truthout: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

501 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers48%attributed speech260writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 33 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 45 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 46 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAbbas Araghchi • 24 words • 0.0% coverageAbbas Araghchi • 20 words • 0.0% coverageAbbas Araghchi • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Abbas Araghchi

100%flagged-word coverage
61 attributed words25% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Biased Writer Voice-32.9 ptsWriter: 60.8%Abbas Araghchi: 27.9%27.9%Unattributed Quote-6.2 ptsWriter: 6.2%Abbas Araghchi: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-5.8 ptsWriter: 5.8%Abbas Araghchi: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.