AP News52%

Trump interrupts a Cabinet meeting dealing with the Iran war and rising prices to talk Sharpies 78%

By Will Weissert52%

3/26/2026, 7:04:38 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 435 faulty-reasoning hits from 700 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 69.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (4,687 of 20,452 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON (AP)  President Donald Trump may believe the adage that the pen is mightier than the sword  as long as it’s a Sharpie. 
During a Cabinet meeting Thursday that discussed the war in Iran, record-long security lines at many of the nation’s top airports, rising oil prices and skittish stock markets, the president interjected by holding up a custom-made black and gold Sharpie and offering a long story about how his preferred marker came to be a White House fixture. 
“See this pen right here?” 
Trump said at the start of a roughly five-minute, on-and-off diatribe on the Sharpie. 
“This pen is an interesting example.” 
It was one of several lengthy asides the president made during the meeting that sometimes felt especially jarring given how many more important things his top advisers could have been discussing. 
The Sharpie monologue came after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, envoy Steve Witkoff, Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio offered sobering comments about missile strikes, Tehran’s uranium enrichment efforts and the U.S. troops that remain in harm’s way. 
The president offered the winding tale as an example of how his business sense can lead to better, cheaper outcomes in federal spending. 
He was also seeking to drive home his broader, long-standing criticism that renovations to the Federal Reserve building in Washington are too expensive. 
“We’ve gotta get our priorities straight,” Trump said. 
The anecdote began with Trump insisting that the White House was once stocked with “beautiful” ballpoint pens that cost $1,000 each. 
That presented a problem, Trump said, when, during ceremonial bill signings, he would hand out pens as keepsakes to lawmakers, supporters and various others who helped make new legislation possible. 
Recipients even included children, whom he lamented did not know the value of what they’d been gifted. 
“Sometimes you have 30, 40 people,” Trump said. 
Despite being known for a love of all things ostentatious  including the sprawling, $400 million White House ballroom he demolished the East Wing to build  Trump said giving away so many expensive pens meant “I feel guilty by nature.” 
“I love the government like I love myself, economically,” Trump said. 
“I want to save money.” 
The president said he worked with a marker maker and worried about giving the company involved too much publicity  only to divulge that it was Sharpie, a longtime favorite of his, drawing laughs from his Cabinet. 
For decades as a celebrity businessman, Trump used the pens to sign autographs or mark up newspaper clippings and send them with personalized notes written in the telltale thick black ink. 
And, as president, Trump has continued to wield Sharpies to sign executive orders, proclamations and bills. 
Trump said he contacted the company and was told that they could make a black pen with the White House logo in gold and that they wouldn’t charge for it. 
Trump said he insisted on paying $5 per marker. 
Online searches reveal that typical Sharpies sell for usually $1 to $2 apiece. 
“The head of Sharpie gets a call. 
I don’t even know who the hell he is. 
He said, ‘Is this really the president?’” 
Trump said. 
It was the most attention the marker has gotten at the White House since the  Sharpiegate  scandal involving Hurricane Dorian during Trump’s first term. 
Still, Sharpie’s manufacturer, Atlanta-based Newell Brands, said in a statement that it didn’t have any information about the conversation Trump described, but that Sharpies are used by current and past U.S. presidents, elected officials, celebrities, athletes, and artists, among others. 
Trump summed it up as “a business story.” 
“For $5, I get a much better pen than for $1,000, and I can hand them out,” he said. 
“And, honestly, they’ve become hot as a pistol, so what can I tell you?” 
After concluding his Sharpie recollections, Trump took a moment to revel in his own storytelling ability before offering the floor to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. 
“Good luck, Scott,” he said as the rest of the Cabinet laughed again. 
“Well, sir,” Bessent offered, “as usual, you’re a tough act to follow.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 2.3%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Will Weissert: 0.7%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 1.7%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.5%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.4%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Will Weissert: 3.0%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias4.9%This article: 5.6%Will Weissert: 7.5%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.5%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.4%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 2.3%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 3.1%AP News: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 8.9%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 11.9%Will Weissert: 2.8%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias11.9%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 1.0%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.4%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.9%AP News: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.5%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 1.1%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 1.6%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.4%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.6%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 3.2%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 1.5%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.7%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.7%Will Weissert: 2.6%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization5.7%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.5%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.2%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.3%Will Weissert: 5.0%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion8.3%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.7%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 2.2%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.5%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 14.3%Will Weissert: 0.8%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal14.3%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 1.8%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 2.1%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 1.6%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 10.3%Will Weissert: 4.4%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice10.3%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.3%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.8%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Weissert: 0.1%AP News: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

700 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers58%attributed speech297writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 57 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 23 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 23 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 8 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 21 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 30 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 17 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 8 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 41 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 11 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 5 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 30 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 9 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageNewell Brands • 40 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 8 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 19 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageTrump • 13 words • 0.0% coverageScott Bessent • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Trump

66%flagged-word coverage
351 attributed words87% of attributed speech24% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-24.2 ptsWriter: 24.2%Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.