What’s Really Driving the Left’s Wins In Democratic Primaries? 93%

By Right Now0% Perry Bacon0%

7/17/2026, 3:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 328 faulty-reasoning hits from 157 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 87.7% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,663 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 92.40% of the article peer group.

You can watch this episode of Right Now With Perry Bacon above or by following this show on YouTube or Substack. 
You can read a transcript here. 
Incumbent Democrats and establishment candidates are falling across the country to more progressive opponents, most notably in recent primaries in Colorado and New York. 
What’s driving these surprisingly results? 
A host of factors, including more liberal attitudes among Democratic voters, the robust get-out-the vote operations that the Democratic Socialists of America have built in cities like New York, and the party base’s frustration with the Democratic leadership for losing twice to Donald Trump. 
In the latest edition of Right Now, Julia Azari and Seth Masket, two professors who specialize in studying party politics, break down which factors are most and least important in this recent leftward surge in the party. 
Azari teaches at Marquette University; Masket at the University of Denver. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 28.0%Right Now: 18.7%newrepublic.com: 6.1%Confirmation Bias28.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 9.3%newrepublic.com: 3.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 4.9%newrepublic.com: 8.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Right Now: 1.1%newrepublic.com: 2.5%Pessimism Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 5.1%newrepublic.com: 13.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 1.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 15.3%Right Now: 5.1%newrepublic.com: 1.4%Recency Bias15.3%This article: 23.6%Right Now: 7.9%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Primacy Effect23.6%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 3.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 1.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 30.6%Right Now: 28.2%newrepublic.com: 3.4%Appeal to Authority30.6%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 1.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 15.3%Right Now: 15.3%newrepublic.com: 8.0%Hasty Generalization15.3%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 6.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 28.0%Right Now: 18.7%newrepublic.com: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)28.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 2.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 23.6%Right Now: 7.9%newrepublic.com: 15.5%Biased Writer Voice23.6%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 2.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 28.0%Right Now: 9.3%newrepublic.com: 7.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias28.0%This article: 0.0%Right Now: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 13.4%Right Now: 10.2%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…13.4%

157 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.