OPB⁠4%

After years of false claims on voting, Trump to give an address on election integrity ⁠71%

By Danielle Kurtzleben⁠55%

7/17/2026, 12:44:41 AM

Keywords: Politics

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.8% saturation with 153 hits. Analysis detected 1,021 faulty-reasoning hits from 496 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 63.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (6,213 of 21,171 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 70.70% of the article peer group.

President Trump, who for years has sowed doubt about the security of American elections, is scheduled to give a primetime address Thursday night on election integrity. 
Listen to NPR’s special coverage starting at 9 p.m. 
ET: 
Trump and his advisers have so far refused to detail what will be in the speech, though White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt suggested at Thursday’s press briefing that he would be presenting what she called “findings” about election integrity. 
“It will shock you if you have an honest eye listening to the president tonight and everything he is saying will be backed by facts and by evidence that will be provided this evening,” she said. 
Trump has long contended, without evidence, that he won the 2020 election — a lie that still comes up often in his speeches and social media posts. 
Numerous reviews have debunked his claims about that election. 
In addition, a federal intelligence report released in March 2021 concluded: “We have no indications that any foreign actor attempted to alter any technical aspect of the voting process in the 2020 US elections, including voter registration, casting ballots, vote tabulation, or reporting results.” 
This report was a declassified version of a report that was provided to Trump and other officials on Jan. 
7, 2021. 
Trump has spent much of his second term attempting to shape elections and voting policy in unprecedented ways. 
Leavitt also said Thursday that Trump would talk about the SAVE America Act, which would among other things require Americans to present proof of citizenship when registering to vote and a form of ID when voting. 
Opponents point to evidence that voter fraud is extremely rare and that some citizens do not readily have access to these documents. 
Trump has been pushing Congress for months to pass that legislation, which has stalled in the Senate. 
Ahead of the speech, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said he thinks it is part of an attempt to delegitimize the upcoming midterms. 
“Trump’s primetime speech tonight isn’t simply about relitigating his overwhelming defeat in the 2020 election; it’s about undermining the 2026 election before a single vote has been cast,” Schumer said on the Senate floor Thursday. 
“Trump won’t expose anything of substance about 2020 — he’ll just echo the same stale, baseless, pathetic lies he’s repeated for six years.” 
When asked by a reporter whether Trump would accept the results of this November’s elections, Leavitt did not directly answer, instead insisting that reporters should tune into the speech. 
Presidential primetime addresses are relatively rare and often happen around major events. 
For example, earlier this term, Trump gave a primetime address to inform the nation about strikes on Iran in June 2025. 
However, he has also given speeches that haven’t been tied to breaking news. 
Trump’s last primetime address came in April, when he updated the nation on the then-one-month-old war with Iran. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 19.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 4.4%Associated Press: 1.8%Confirmation Bias19.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.8%Associated Press: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 2.0%Associated Press: 2.7%Availability Heuristic6.0%This article: 2.4%Danielle Kurtzleben: 1.1%Associated Press: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic2.4%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Danielle Kurtzleben: 5.6%Associated Press: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias7.3%This article: 20.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 9.9%Associated Press: 4.8%Framing Effect20.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 4.4%Associated Press: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%Danielle Kurtzleben: 1.3%Associated Press: 2.1%Pessimism Bias10.7%This article: 30.8%Danielle Kurtzleben: 11.7%Associated Press: 6.5%Negativity Bias30.8%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 4.6%Associated Press: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 3.3%Associated Press: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.9%Associated Press: 1.1%In-Group Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 1.1%Associated Press: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 1.4%Associated Press: 1.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.6%Danielle Kurtzleben: 1.5%Associated Press: 1.0%Recency Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Danielle Kurtzleben: 1.6%Associated Press: 0.3%Ad Hominem4.6%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 1.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.9%Danielle Kurtzleben: 3.5%Associated Press: 3.6%Appeal to Authority17.9%This article: 7.1%Danielle Kurtzleben: 1.5%Associated Press: 0.9%False Dilemma7.1%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.1%Danielle Kurtzleben: 3.1%Associated Press: 2.4%Hasty Generalization9.1%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.3%Danielle Kurtzleben: 3.7%Associated Press: 3.5%Appeal to Emotion7.3%This article: 7.1%Danielle Kurtzleben: 1.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Begging the Question7.1%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 3.4%Associated Press: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.4%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.5%Burden of Proof5.4%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.9%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.8%Associated Press: 1.2%Anecdotal7.9%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 1.1%Associated Press: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 1.8%Associated Press: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 13.1%Danielle Kurtzleben: 1.3%Associated Press: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection13.1%This article: 13.7%Danielle Kurtzleben: 7.6%Associated Press: 2.8%Biased Writer Voice13.7%This article: 7.3%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.5%Associated Press: 1.2%Indoctrination7.3%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Danielle Kurtzleben: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.8%

496 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers37%attributed speech313writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageKaroline Leavitt • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKaroline Leavitt • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageChuck Schumer • 24 words • 0.0% coverageChuck Schumer • 35 words • 0.0% coverageChuck Schumer • 23 words • 0.0% coverageKaroline Leavitt • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Chuck Schumer

100%flagged-word coverage
82 attributed words45% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-21.7 ptsWriter: 21.7%Chuck Schumer: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.9 ptsWriter: 2.9%Chuck Schumer: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.