1,200-year-old infant burial found near famous Temple of Artemis in Turkey contains twins  one with an unusual extra rib 9%

By Kristina Killgrove15%

7/24/2026, 8:13:03 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Overconfidence Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 132 hits. Analysis detected 832 faulty-reasoning hits from 789 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 25.1% and a BS Rank of 9% (20,093 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.80% of the article peer group.

Archaeologists have uncovered a rare and unusual burial of premature twins in a 1,200-year-old tomb near the Temple of Artemis at Ephesus in Turkey. 
Although the burial was found in an abandoned latrine, researchers think the intention was to protect the babies in the afterlife. 
"This interment was made in an unexpected and exceptional setting," Lilli Zabrana , an archaeologist at the Austrian Academy of Sciences who co-authored a new study detailing the discovery, told Live Science in an email. 
Burials previously discovered at Ephesus were made in a dedicated cemetery outside the boundaries of the ancient temple. 
"What is even more unusual is that the burial contains two premature infants, who were probably twins, which is a rather rare occurrence ," study co-author Caroline Partiot , a bioarchaeologist at the Austrian Academy of Sciences, told Live Science in an email. 
Evidence of a rare genetic condition found in one of the infants makes the finding even more unique, the researchers noted. 
In the study, published online July 13 in the journal Childhood in the Past , Partiot and Zabrana analyzed bones found in a tomb that was likely built in the eighth to ninth century, during the middle Byzantine era. 
The grave was placed within an abandoned latrine channel, originally built during the second or third century, Zabrana said, but the latrine was a later addition to a Roman odeum  a building used for musical performances  that was built in the first century within the sacred area of the famous Temple of Artemis at Ephesus (one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World ), which was originally built around 550 B.C. 
The Romans built a music hall called an odeum at the Temple of Artemis. 
The infants were found in a tomb in the odeum's latrine. 
(Image credit: © OeAW-OeAI/N. 
Gail) When excavators opened the cist, or stone-lined grave, they saw two tiny skeletons buried side by side. 
Based primarily on the size of the bones, Partiot and Zabrana estimated the skeletons were from infants who were likely born prematurely at around 33 to 34 gestational weeks, or 7.5 months in utero. 
(A full-term pregnancy typically lasts between 39 and 40 weeks .) 
"The hypothesis that they were twins is based on the fact that they have very similar ages at death and were buried in direct contact with one another," Partiot said. 
"However, it will only be possible to confirm whether they were indeed twins through future DNA analyses." 
Although the researchers did not find any evidence of trauma or disease on the babies' skeletons, they did notice a rare bone called a supernumerary cervical rib . 
This hereditary trait involves the growth of an extra rib bone that forms at the back of the neck in about 1% of people and usually doesn't cause any problems. 
However, Partiot has found that, in babies, there is an association between cervical ribs and anomalies in Hox genes  a group of genes that code for specific body parts during embryonic development  that can lead to stillbirth, prematurity or sudden infant death. 
"To the best of our knowledge, no cases of twins with cervical ribs have been documented in an archaeological context" before this one, the researchers wrote. 
The twins may have been buried in an odd location outside the known burial grounds at Ephesus because they died as premature infants who probably hadn't been baptized yet, the researchers proposed. 
The infants' final resting place was likely a kind of "practical compromise" between Christian burial practices and local customs, the researchers wrote in the study. 
Famous Sutton Hoo helmet may be clue that early Anglo-Saxons fought as mercenaries for Byzantine Empire, study suggests 
Exceptionally rare iron saber, arrowheads and jewelry discovered in seventh-century warrior's tomb in Hungary 
Rare Byzantine swords found in medieval stronghold 
The team found no evidence of the twins' mother nearby or in the Ephesus cemetery. 
"It is possible she died at the same time, but it is also possible that she did not; it is difficult to say," Partiot said. 
"Both infant mortality and maternal mortality were very high at the time." 
But the twins' protective cist grave preserved their skeletons for more than a millennium, which "clearly indicates that this was a respectful burial rather than the disposal of human remains," Zabrana said. 
Ultimately, the tomb reveals a family's "intention to care for the two deceased infants in death, and to acknowledge their fleeting place within the community," the researchers wrote. 
What do you know about the bones in your body? 
Test your knowledge with our human skeleton quiz . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.7%Kristina Killgrove: 4.1%Live Science: 2.7%Confirmation Bias16.7%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 1.1%Live Science: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.8%Kristina Killgrove: 2.7%Live Science: 2.7%Availability Heuristic11.8%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 2.1%Live Science: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.5%Live Science: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%Kristina Killgrove: 3.4%Live Science: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias8.4%This article: 3.2%Kristina Killgrove: 1.5%Live Science: 3.3%Framing Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.0%Live Science: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.1%Live Science: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.0%Live Science: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 2.7%Live Science: 3.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Kristina Killgrove: 1.3%Live Science: 1.2%Pessimism Bias3.2%This article: 3.5%Kristina Killgrove: 1.5%Live Science: 3.3%Negativity Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.3%Live Science: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.7%Live Science: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.3%Live Science: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.1%Live Science: 0.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.0%Live Science: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 1.7%Live Science: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.0%Live Science: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.0%Live Science: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.3%Live Science: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Kristina Killgrove: 0.7%Live Science: 0.3%Primacy Effect2.3%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.0%Live Science: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.0%Live Science: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.1%Live Science: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.5%Kristina Killgrove: 5.0%Live Science: 4.2%Appeal to Authority1.5%This article: 4.1%Kristina Killgrove: 1.5%Live Science: 1.1%False Dilemma4.1%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.1%Live Science: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.0%Live Science: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.0%Kristina Killgrove: 4.9%Live Science: 3.8%Hasty Generalization8.0%This article: 4.9%Kristina Killgrove: 0.5%Live Science: 0.3%Red Herring4.9%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.1%Live Science: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.1%Kristina Killgrove: 1.2%Live Science: 2.3%Appeal to Emotion4.1%This article: 6.2%Kristina Killgrove: 0.7%Live Science: 0.5%Begging the Question6.2%This article: 5.6%Kristina Killgrove: 1.8%Live Science: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.6%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.0%Live Science: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.4%Live Science: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 3.8%Kristina Killgrove: 0.8%Live Science: 0.5%Appeal to Nature3.8%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.4%Live Science: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 1.0%Live Science: 1.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 3.3%Kristina Killgrove: 0.1%Live Science: 0.1%No True Scotsman3.3%This article: 7.0%Kristina Killgrove: 2.4%Live Science: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.0%Live Science: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.3%Live Science: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.1%Live Science: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.1%Live Science: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 5.6%Kristina Killgrove: 0.3%Live Science: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy5.6%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 1.1%Live Science: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.8%Live Science: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 1.8%Live Science: 3.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 1.0%Live Science: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.0%Live Science: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kristina Killgrove: 0.0%Live Science: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Kristina Killgrove: 3.0%Live Science: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.4%

789 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers36%attributed speech503writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageLilli Zabrana • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageCaroline Partiot • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageLilli Zabrana • 74 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageGail • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageCaroline Partiot • 30 words • 0.0% coverageCaroline Partiot • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageCaroline Partiot • 25 words • 0.0% coverageCaroline Partiot • 12 words • 0.0% coverageLilli Zabrana • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Caroline Partiot

87%flagged-word coverage
127 attributed words44% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.8 ptsWriter: 3.8%Caroline Partiot: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.