Gizmodo57%

An Official, Never-Before-Seen 'Star Wars' Cartoon Will Debut at the Lucas Museum 36%

By Germain Lussier43%

7/24/2026, 1:00:08 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 27.3% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 763 faulty-reasoning hits from 477 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.9% and a BS Rank of 36% (14,135 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the article peer group.

In the decade between Revenge of the Sith and The Force Awakens, Star Wars was weird. 
George Lucas didn’t want to make any more movies, so he explored bringing a galaxy far, far away to television. 
Most of that never got very far. 
But one show, called Star Wars: Detours, actually completed several dozen episodes before being almost totally forgotten. 
First announced in 2012, Star Wars: Detours was going to be The Simpsons but Star Wars. 
Lucas himself was involved in the show, which was co-created by the Robot Chicken team of Seth Green and Matthew Senreich. 
However, when Disney bought Lucasfilm, seeing Luke Skywalker and Han Solo be goofy didn’t quite fit in with the brand, so it was shelved indefinitely. 
“Well, there are 39 episodes that were finished for broadcast,” Green said back in 2021. 
“But we finished them almost 10 years ago, and so there would have to be a bit of reconfiguring of the existing stuff to make it something that Disney+ would release as a Lucasfilm offering. 
And the way it’s been explained to me is that there hasn’t been enough interest high enough up to go through what it would take to put it out, and that there isn’t an interest in releasing this content on Disney+ from Lucasfilm.” 
Re-enter George Lucas. 
Since selling Lucasfilm and Star Wars, Lucas has spent a good chunk of his time creating the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art, which is opening in Los Angeles in September. 
And, in a Hall H panel at San Diego Comic-Con this week, Green gave fans some very good news. 
“There’s going to be a curation of episodes of that show on display for the public at the museum,” he said. 
“Things like that get so far out of your hands so quickly that I’m just excited for people to get to see it. 
What it does, how it’s measured, where it sits, none of that will be a part of the story 10 years from now.” 
“This is something that we got to do with George, and he had his hands all over it,” Senreich added. 
“I’m just excited for people to see it.” 
It’s not clear how, where, and how many episodes of the show will be at the museum, but it’s awesome that George Lucas thought Detours was an important enough piece of Star Wars history to include it, and that Disney is actually allowing it. 
The Lucas Museum of Narrative Art opens to the public on September 22, and tickets are on sale now. 
Want more io9 news? 
Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what’s next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.0%Germain Lussier: 2.2%Gizmodo: 4.1%Confirmation Bias9.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 1.1%Gizmodo: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Germain Lussier: 3.3%Gizmodo: 3.1%Availability Heuristic1.5%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 1.3%Gizmodo: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.4%Gizmodo: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 2.4%Gizmodo: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Germain Lussier: 2.4%Gizmodo: 5.5%Framing Effect5.2%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.6%Gizmodo: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.6%Gizmodo: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 17.2%Germain Lussier: 4.7%Gizmodo: 3.9%Optimism Bias17.2%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.8%Gizmodo: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Germain Lussier: 2.4%Gizmodo: 7.5%Negativity Bias3.4%This article: 4.2%Germain Lussier: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias4.2%This article: 4.2%Germain Lussier: 0.1%Gizmodo: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error4.2%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.4%Gizmodo: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Germain Lussier: 0.9%Gizmodo: 0.9%In-Group Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 7.8%Gizmodo: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 1.2%Gizmodo: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.5%Gizmodo: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.1%Gizmodo: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.4%Germain Lussier: 2.0%Gizmodo: 4.3%Appeal to Authority8.4%This article: 5.2%Germain Lussier: 0.7%Gizmodo: 1.4%False Dilemma5.2%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.5%Germain Lussier: 3.8%Gizmodo: 5.3%Hasty Generalization1.5%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 1.2%Gizmodo: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.5%Germain Lussier: 2.9%Gizmodo: 4.9%Appeal to Emotion6.5%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.4%Gizmodo: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 1.4%Gizmodo: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 13.8%Germain Lussier: 1.1%Gizmodo: 2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)13.8%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.2%Germain Lussier: 0.4%Gizmodo: 0.1%Middle Ground9.2%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 27.3%Germain Lussier: 5.1%Gizmodo: 4.6%Unattributed Quote27.3%This article: 3.1%Germain Lussier: 0.8%Gizmodo: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection3.1%This article: 22.6%Germain Lussier: 8.1%Gizmodo: 13.5%Biased Writer Voice22.6%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.9%Gizmodo: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Germain Lussier: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.4%Germain Lussier: 7.0%Gizmodo: 3.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…12.4%

477 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.