ABC News22%

ICE drops plan to convert 2 Pennsylvania warehouses into detention centers 21%

By The Associated Press63%

7/22/2026, 5:09:33 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 356 faulty-reasoning hits from 286 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.1% and a BS Rank of 21% (17,352 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the article peer group.

U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement is giving up on its plan to use two rural Pennsylvania warehouses to hold thousands of people. 
The plan had been held up by the state's denial of drinking water and wastewater permits, and an ICE lawyer filed paperwork Wednesday withdrawing his agency's appeal of the denial. 
The state had raised concerns that the local water and wastewater services in rural areas of Berks and Schuylkill counties were inadequate to handle the thousands of inhabitants envisioned by the federal agency. 
ICE did not say what, if anything, it would ultimately use the warehouses for. 
But it told the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection in a separate letter that it “has considered the final use it will make of this property, and it hereby informs DEP that it will not be using this property as a detention center.” 
The letter, dated last week, was released Wednesday by the DEP. 
In a statement, Gov. 
Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, said the warehouses "are not suitable for people and converting them to detention centers would have posed serious risks to the health, safety, and infrastructure of the surrounding communities.” 
ICE had been buying warehouses across the U.S. as part of former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s $38 billion plan to rapidly expand detention capacity this year. 
However, it began retreating from that plan last month. 
Noem’s purchases were largely made out of public view and angered communities that were caught by surprise. 
Some local officials only learned about ICE’s ambitions after the agency bought or leased space for detainees. 
After Noem was fired, her replacement, Markwayne Mullin, quickly paused the purchase of new warehouses. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.3%The Associated Press: 2.8%ABC News: 2.2%Confirmation Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.4%ABC News: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%The Associated Press: 3.2%ABC News: 3.0%Availability Heuristic5.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%ABC News: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%ABC News: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.8%ABC News: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%The Associated Press: 11.1%ABC News: 6.8%Framing Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%ABC News: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.7%ABC News: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%The Associated Press: 0.1%ABC News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect9.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 3.1%ABC News: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.5%The Associated Press: 1.7%ABC News: 1.0%Pessimism Bias11.5%This article: 18.9%The Associated Press: 11.0%ABC News: 7.7%Negativity Bias18.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.2%ABC News: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.2%ABC News: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%ABC News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.2%ABC News: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%The Associated Press: 1.0%ABC News: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.9%ABC News: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%ABC News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%The Associated Press: 2.0%ABC News: 1.3%Recency Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%ABC News: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 4.9%The Associated Press: 0.1%ABC News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%ABC News: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%ABC News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.0%The Associated Press: 3.8%ABC News: 3.3%Appeal to Authority15.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.2%ABC News: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%ABC News: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%ABC News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.9%The Associated Press: 3.0%ABC News: 2.8%Hasty Generalization5.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%ABC News: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%ABC News: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 11.5%The Associated Press: 5.6%ABC News: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion11.5%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%ABC News: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.2%The Associated Press: 2.8%ABC News: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.2%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%ABC News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%ABC News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%ABC News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%ABC News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.9%The Associated Press: 1.3%ABC News: 1.2%Anecdotal5.9%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.7%ABC News: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%ABC News: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%ABC News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%ABC News: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%ABC News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.8%ABC News: 1.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.2%ABC News: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 9.8%The Associated Press: 3.9%ABC News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice9.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.7%ABC News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%ABC News: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%ABC News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%ABC News: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

286 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers27%attributed speech210writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageImmigration and Customs Enforcement • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Shapiro • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Josh Shapiro

100%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words43% of attributed speech62% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-13.3 ptsWriter: 13.3%Josh Shapiro: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.