ABC News17%

2 more convictions thrown out in 2020 plot to kidnap Michigan governor 8%

By The Associated Press65%

7/20/2026, 9:55:32 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 343 faulty-reasoning hits from 335 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 25% and a BS Rank of 8% (18,819 of 20,381 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 92.30% of the article peer group.

DETROIT -- A state appeals court on Monday set aside convictions for two men involved in a 2020 plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. 
Gretchen Whitmer. 
Pete Musico and Paul Bellar were convicted of providing material support for an act of terrorism. 
They, along with co-defendant Joe Morrison, were accused of having secondary roles in the scheme. 
Morrison's conviction was thrown out in June in a precedent-setting decision. 
A different panel at the Michigan Court of Appeals said it was obligated to apply that ruling to Musico and Bellar as well. 
The convictions were overturned on technical grounds. 
The appeals court said kidnapping is not an underlying violent felony that can support a conviction under Michigan’s terrorism law. 
Attorney General Dana Nessel called it “linguistic gymnastics” and said she would ask the Michigan Supreme Court to take up the cases. 
Morrison, Musico and Bellar were not charged with having a direct role in the plot to kidnap Whitmer. 
Bellar had moved out of state weeks before the FBI made arrests in October 2020, and Morrison and Musico said they, too, were no longer in contact with key figures. 
But they had been members of a paramilitary group that earlier trained with Adam Fox, who was prosecuted in federal court as a leader and is serving a 16-year prison sentence for conspiracy. 
As part of the plot, Whitmer was supposed to be kidnapped her from her vacation home just before the 2020 presidential election. 
Prosecutors said the conspirators were furious over tough COVID-19 restrictions that Whitmer and officials in other states had put in place during the early months of the pandemic, as well as perceived threats to gun ownership. 
Whitmer, a Democrat, was never physically harmed. 
Undercover FBI agents and informants were inside Fox’s group for months, and the scheme was broken up. 
The overall investigation, however, produced mixed results for state and federal prosecutors. 
Five of the 14 men were acquitted at trials. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.9%ABC News: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.5%ABC News: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%The Associated Press: 3.3%ABC News: 3.1%Availability Heuristic8.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%ABC News: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.7%ABC News: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.9%ABC News: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 12.2%The Associated Press: 11.7%ABC News: 6.8%Framing Effect12.2%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%ABC News: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%ABC News: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%ABC News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 3.1%ABC News: 2.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.8%ABC News: 1.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 12.8%The Associated Press: 11.2%ABC News: 7.7%Negativity Bias12.8%This article: 9.0%The Associated Press: 2.3%ABC News: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias9.0%This article: 10.7%The Associated Press: 1.2%ABC News: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error10.7%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%ABC News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.3%ABC News: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 9.9%The Associated Press: 1.0%ABC News: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias9.9%This article: 2.1%The Associated Press: 2.0%ABC News: 2.3%Halo Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%ABC News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.6%The Associated Press: 2.0%ABC News: 1.3%Recency Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%ABC News: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%ABC News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%ABC News: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%ABC News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.3%The Associated Press: 3.9%ABC News: 3.4%Appeal to Authority3.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.2%ABC News: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%ABC News: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%ABC News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.7%The Associated Press: 3.1%ABC News: 2.8%Hasty Generalization10.7%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%ABC News: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%ABC News: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.6%The Associated Press: 5.7%ABC News: 4.4%Appeal to Emotion6.6%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%ABC News: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 3.0%ABC News: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%ABC News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%ABC News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%ABC News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%ABC News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.4%ABC News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.7%ABC News: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%ABC News: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%ABC News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%ABC News: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%ABC News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.6%The Associated Press: 1.9%ABC News: 1.9%Unattributed Quote6.6%This article: 6.6%The Associated Press: 1.2%ABC News: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection6.6%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 4.1%ABC News: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.7%ABC News: 0.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.8%ABC News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%ABC News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%ABC News: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

335 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers13%attributed speech290writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMichigan Court of Appeals • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDana Nessel • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Dana Nessel

100%flagged-word coverage
22 attributed words49% of attributed speech60% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Dana Nessel: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Dana Nessel: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.