FOLLOWUP: SDOT sets dates for closing West Seattle low bridge to replace gate 2%

8/6/2026, 10:34:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 1 faulty reasoning type, including Optimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 32 faulty-reasoning hits from 220 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,958 of 28,486 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the article peer group.

In our coverage last week of three consecutive evenings’ low-bridge breakdowns, we noted that SDOT expected to have to close that bridge for repairs. 
They’ve just announced the dates – but note that only the driving lanes will be closed: 
We will close the Spokane Swing Bridge (also known as the Low Bridge) to replace the barrier gate at the bridge’s west side. 
During this time, people will not be able to drive across the bridge. 
However, people will still be able to walk, bike, or roll across as we do our work. 
When? 
Between 7 am Saturday (August 22) and 4 am Monday (August 24) 
Why? 
As a result of the September 2024 vehicle collision, the entire barrier gate system has been having issues. 
We will be replacing the barrier gate at the west side of the bridge. 
We hope to replace the east side barrier gate in the coming months, as we work with the railroad companies to coordinate a time for the work. 
Stay tuned for more updates in the coming weeks. 
This bridge is a crucial link across the West Duwamish Waterway, especially for people walking, rolling, and biking. 
Thanks to the entire West Seattle community and Low Bridge travelers for being patient. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 1.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 2.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 5.6%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 2.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 14.5%West Seattle Blog: 2.1%Optimism Bias14.5%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 2.4%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 1.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 1.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 1.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 1.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 2.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%West Seattle Blog: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

220 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker60%attributed speech87writer words
Selected voice

SDOT

0%flagged-word coverage
133 attributed words100% of attributed speech37% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.