Sea Dogs give up 4 in 6th in loss to Fisher Cats 1%

By Scott Martin0%

8/6/2026, 5:57:26 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 0 faulty reasoning types, including no named faulty reasoning patterns yet, with no single egregious example has been isolated yet. Analysis detected 0 faulty-reasoning hits from 190 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,302 of 28,464 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the article peer group.

The New Hampshire Fisher Cats scored four runs in the bottom of the sixth inning to beat the Portland Sea Dogs 5-2 in an Eastern League game on Wednesday in Manchester, New Hampshire. 
Johanfran Garcia hit an RBI double in the top of the sixth for Portland to tie the game 1-1. 
New Hampshire quickly answered when Eric Snow and Mathieu Vallee both drew one-out walks and advanced on a double steal. 
Nick Goodwin gave the Fisher Cats the lead with a sacrifice fly and Dub Gleed hit a three-run homer to make it 5-1. 
Miguel Bleis hit an RBI single in the ninth for Portland. 
Alexis Hernandez hit an RBI single in the first to give New Hampshire a 1-0 lead. 
Sea Dogs starting pitcher Hayden Mullins allowed a run on five hits, while striking out eight and walking two in 4 2/3 innings. 
Cooper Adams took the loss in relief, allowing four runs on two hits and three walks in one inning 
New Hampshire has won two of the first three games of the six-game series. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.0%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 3.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 3.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 3.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 3.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

190 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.