BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 674 faulty-reasoning hits from 619 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.4% and a BS Rank of 25% (22,178 of 29,339 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the article peer group.

It had been years since Edgar Mercado had eaten at a Taco Bell restaurant. 
But early last month, his 14-year-old son wanted some, so he took him to the one near Belmont and Milwaukee avenues. 
“We ate there. 
A couple of days later, I got sick. 
My stomach was in pain, like somebody hit me with a hockey stick. 
I threw up a few times and then the diarrhea. 
I was dizzy and I couldn’t get out of bed,” the 50-year-old Mercado, who lives in the Jefferson Park neighborhood. 
Once he was able to get to a doctor, Mercado said it was confirmed he had Cyclosporiasis, caused by the microscopic parasite Cyclospora. 
“I couldn't go to work. 
I sent them a copy of my situation and they just let me go,” said Mercado, who had been working for more than a month at a Jewel distribution facility in Melrose Park. 
Mercado plans to sue Taco Bell and Taylor Farms for his illness and loss of wages. 
“We want to make sure that each of our clients are fully and fairly compensated for the losses they've suffered. 
The second thing we're looking for is to figure out exactly how this happened. 
How the feces got in the lettuce,” said Ron Simon, Mercado’s attorney, who has not yet filed a lawsuit. 
Simon’s says his firm represents 300 Illinois residents who claim to have gotten sick from cyclospora. 
“We want to make sure we force Taylor Farms and Taco Bell to take steps to make sure that no one else gets hurt in the future,” Simon said. 
Neither Taco Bell or Taylor Farms could be reached for comment. 
According to UChicago Medicine, cyclospora is a parasite that's very hard to eradicate. 
Those infected can expereience loss of appetite, abdominal cramping and bloating, fatigue, low-grade fever and increased flatulence. 
Symptoms start two to 14 days after consumption and can last for several weeks. 
“Cyclospora outbreaks are not new. 
We do see cyclospora outbreaks occur from time to time related to contaminated soil and produce,” Dr. 
Aniruddha Hazra, associate professor of Medicine and Director of the Infectious Disease Fellowship Program, at UChicago Medicine. 
“I think the concern that many of us have in infectious disease and public health is that the extent at which this outbreak has been allowed to expand is certainly unusual, and what really something that should be taken note of,” Hazra said. 
Dr. 
Hazra said the parasite is very hard to kill. 
The only way to be safe in eating spinach, for example, is to cook it. 
According to the Illinois Department of Public Health, there have been 995 confirmed or probable cases of cyclospora, with 58 hospitalizations but no deaths, as of Tuesday. 
In Cook County alone, there have been112 probable and confirmed cyclosporiasis cases 
Simon, Mercado's attorney, said the federal government could do more. 
“This administration made the decision to cut back on jobs and workers at the [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] before the outbreak. 
As a result, there's not enough people at the CDC to track and keep up with these cases,” Simon said. 
“They’re working overtime as it is. 
We just don’t have enough people out there trying to solve the outbreak and that’s why it’s taking so long.” 
A month after heading to Taco Bell for lunch with his son, Mercado said he’s feeling better. 
Mercado added he did not take any medication to get well, other than drinking Pedialyte. 
“It’s been about four days now that I’ve been back to normal. 
It feels good to be back to normal,” Mercado said. 
“I was praying to God every day to take this away from me.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.4%Michael Puente: 1.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.5%Confirmation Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Michael Puente: 3.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.4%Availability Heuristic3.4%This article: 7.1%Michael Puente: 0.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic7.1%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Michael Puente: 4.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.8%Framing Effect3.7%This article: 0.8%Michael Puente: 0.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.8%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%Michael Puente: 0.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.3%Optimism Bias4.4%This article: 3.2%Michael Puente: 0.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.1%Pessimism Bias3.2%This article: 11.6%Michael Puente: 5.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 6.5%Negativity Bias11.6%This article: 5.3%Michael Puente: 1.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias5.3%This article: 3.2%Michael Puente: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error3.2%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 1.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 1.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 1.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 1.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 1.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.6%Michael Puente: 1.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.1%Appeal to Authority3.6%This article: 2.4%Michael Puente: 1.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.2%False Dilemma2.4%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.0%Michael Puente: 3.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.6%Hasty Generalization9.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.6%Michael Puente: 7.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion1.6%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 10.7%Michael Puente: 2.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.7%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.6%Michael Puente: 0.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Burden of Proof2.6%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.4%Michael Puente: 2.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.4%Anecdotal2.4%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.1%Michael Puente: 0.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.1%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.9%Michael Puente: 0.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Middle Ground6.9%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.9%Michael Puente: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.3%Unattributed Quote1.9%This article: 0.5%Michael Puente: 1.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.5%This article: 2.7%Michael Puente: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.7%Biased Writer Voice2.7%This article: 7.9%Michael Puente: 1.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.5%Indoctrination7.9%This article: 3.2%Michael Puente: 0.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michael Puente: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

619 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers62%attributed speech233writer words
Selected voice

Dr. Aniruddha Hazra

100%flagged-word coverage
89 attributed words23% of attributed speech56% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Indoctrination-8.6 ptsWriter: 8.6%Dr. Aniruddha Hazra: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.3 ptsWriter: 7.3%Dr. Aniruddha Hazra: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-5.2 ptsWriter: 5.2%Dr. Aniruddha Hazra: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.3 ptsWriter: 1.3%Dr. Aniruddha Hazra: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.