Signature-gathering deadline for data center petition changed to past tense 12%

By Zeke Lloyd21%

8/4/2026, 7:01:14 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 568 faulty-reasoning hits from 578 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 22.8% and a BS Rank of 12% (24,779 of 28,112 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 88.10% of the article peer group.

A petition to require data center developments in Yellowstone County to receive voter approval needed to deliver the requisite number of signatures three weeks ago, according to a memo released Tuesday by the Yellowstone County Attorney’s Office. 
Signature gatherers had been operating under a deadline of Aug. 12, a date provided by the Yellowstone County Election Department in June. 
Yellowstone County Attorney Scott Twito told Montana Free Press on Tuesday that the deadline’s shift to July 13 was prompted by data center developer Quantica Infrastructure, which made him aware of a relevant state statute on July 30. 
The new deadline was first reported by the Billings Gazette . 
Quantica has proposed a 5,000-acre data center campus just outside Broadview, a town of about 140 people located about 30 miles north of Billings. 
Plans for the facility include 12 to 16 buildings of about 200,000 to 300,000 square feet each. 
The entire campus would encompass about 7.8 square miles. 
Quantica estimates its near-term power requirements at 1,100 megawatts. 
Broadview-based Kassi Solberg spearheaded the Yellowstone County Ballot Initiative . 
The petition aimed to put language on the November ballot that, if passed, would require voter approval of any data center development in the county. 
Solberg has been trying to gather the 16,650 necessary signatures by Aug. 
12. 
But Tuesday’s memo from the county attorney to the elections administrator indicates that the deadline to submit signatures was actually three weeks ago. 
Twito said that the county election department relied in June on Montana Code Annotated § 13-12-201 when it provided Solberg with the Aug. 12 deadline. 
According to Twito, Quantica informed his office on July 30 that a different law, Montana Code Annotated § 13-28-206 , with a July 13 deadline, should be applied instead. 
The statute initially used by the election department applies to ballot certifications, while the latter applies to local initiatives. 
Twito said he spent the weekend researching Quantica’s assertion, and that he ultimately agrees with Quantica’s assessment that Solberg’s petition is more accurately a local initiative, and is therefore governed by the second statute. 
In his Tuesday memo, Twito recommended that the election department inform Solberg about the new deadline, because “the signature submission deadline appears to have passed under this interpretation.” 
Quantica spokesperson Travis Hall declined to immediately provide comment to MTFP on Tuesday. 
Brian Miller, an attorney running for U.S. 
House in Montana’s Second Congressional District who has been working with Solberg on the initiative, told MTFP Tuesday that using the July deadline is unconstitutional. 
“I think that the county should accept the signatures up to the deadline that they told everybody they would,” Miller said in a statement provided to MTFP. 
“I think it raises a serious constitutional question for them to take the step now because it is unnecessarily infringing upon the people’s right to petition by initiative.” 
Miller said he plans to file a claim asking a court to declare denial of Solberg’s signatures submitted after July 13 unconstitutional. 
“You’re messing with people’s rights here,” Miller said. 
“You’re making people feel demoralized by their government.” 
Twito said he is seeking guidance from Montana’s secretary of state on the competing statutes. 
But as of now, he said, the county should not accept signatures from Solberg “unless a court says differently.” 
Nick Mott contributed reporting. 
The post Signature-gathering deadline for data center petition changed to past tense appeared first on Montana Free Press . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.9%Zeke Lloyd: 3.7%Montana Free Press: 0.7%Confirmation Bias9.9%This article: 3.8%Zeke Lloyd: 0.4%Montana Free Press: 0.9%Anchoring Bias3.8%This article: 4.2%Zeke Lloyd: 1.0%Montana Free Press: 1.1%Availability Heuristic4.2%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 1.7%Zeke Lloyd: 0.2%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Hindsight Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.5%Montana Free Press: 0.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Zeke Lloyd: 2.7%Montana Free Press: 2.4%Framing Effect4.7%This article: 4.8%Zeke Lloyd: 0.5%Montana Free Press: 0.3%Loss Aversion4.8%This article: 3.3%Zeke Lloyd: 0.6%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Status Quo Bias3.3%This article: 2.1%Zeke Lloyd: 0.2%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 1.8%Montana Free Press: 1.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 1.8%Montana Free Press: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.9%Zeke Lloyd: 4.5%Montana Free Press: 1.6%Negativity Bias15.9%This article: 5.9%Zeke Lloyd: 1.4%Montana Free Press: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.7%Montana Free Press: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.1%Montana Free Press: 0.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Zeke Lloyd: 0.4%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Ad Hominem2.2%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.9%Zeke Lloyd: 1.9%Montana Free Press: 1.2%Appeal to Authority6.9%This article: 3.3%Zeke Lloyd: 3.4%Montana Free Press: 0.7%False Dilemma3.3%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.7%Montana Free Press: 1.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.6%Zeke Lloyd: 6.1%Montana Free Press: 1.5%Appeal to Emotion7.6%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.5%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.6%Montana Free Press: 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.2%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.8%Zeke Lloyd: 0.7%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Burden of Proof3.8%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.3%Zeke Lloyd: 0.5%Montana Free Press: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.3%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.5%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 2.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.8%Zeke Lloyd: 1.1%Montana Free Press: 0.4%Unattributed Quote4.8%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.0%Zeke Lloyd: 1.4%Montana Free Press: 0.5%Biased Writer Voice4.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zeke Lloyd: 0.0%Montana Free Press: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

578 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers53%attributed speech272writer words
Selected voice

Brian Miller

100%flagged-word coverage
118 attributed words39% of attributed speech33% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.5 ptsWriter: 8.5%Brian Miller: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.