Big inning lifts Fisher Cats past Sea Dogs 1%

By Scott Martin0%

8/4/2026, 5:48:42 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 0 faulty reasoning types, including no named faulty reasoning patterns yet, with no single egregious example has been isolated yet. Analysis detected 0 faulty-reasoning hits from 178 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,294 of 28,464 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the article peer group.

J.R. 
Freethy and Nick Goodwin each had an RBI double in the third inning when the New Hampshire Fisher Cats scored four times on their way to a 6-4 win over the Portland Sea Dogs in an Eastern League game on Tuesday in Manchester, New Hamsphire. 
Hedbert Perez added an RBI single in the third and Carter Cunningham scored on a wild pitch. 
New Hampshire had six hits and a walk in the inning against reliever Caleb Bolden. 
Johanfran Garcia hit a solo home run and Miguel Bleis an RBI single as Portland scored twice in the fourth. 
The Sea Dogs got within a run in the seventh on an RBI ground out by Yoeilin Cespedes, but Dub Gleed answered with a two-run home run in the bottom of the inning for New Hampshire. 
Bleis added a solo home run in the ninth. 
He was 3 for 4 with two RBI and two runs scored. 
Jeremy Wu-Yelland made his first start of the season for Portland, pitching two scoreless innings. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.0%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 3.0%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 3.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 3.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 3.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Scott Martin: 0.0%The Portland Press Herald: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

178 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.