Bill Plaschke: Tarik Skubal trade brings Dodgers hate, envy  and another championship 61%

By Tribune News Service41%

8/1/2026, 9:19:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 33 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 49.7% saturation with 397 hits. Analysis detected 1,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 799 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.8% and a BS Rank of 61% (11,628 of 29,339 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the article peer group.

By Bill Plaschke, Los Angeles Times 
LOS ANGELES  Tarik Skubal is a Dodger. 
The five words every baseball soul outside of Los Angeles dreaded hearing. 
The Dodgers are going to three-peat. 
The six words that every baseball soul everywhere must now acknowledge. 
It’s over. 
The chase for baseball’s best pitcher, the hunt by baseball’s best team, the pennant race, the World Series, all of it. 
It’s over. 
The Dodgers just stole it all again, three months early but right on time, their third consecutive championship cemented when they traded for the Detroit Tigers' Tarik Skubal, the two-time defending Cy Young Award winner and quite simply the best pitcher in baseball. 
Everybody wanted him. 
The Dodgers were the only team with enough assets to get him. 
Of course they were. 
They always are. 
And in return, they will surely win a third consecutive championship against a withering and overmatched group of pretenders that could only add Skubal in their dreams. 
He cost top prospects Zyhir Hope, River Ryan and Brady Smith. 
So? 
The Dodgers have tons of them. 
He could be a free agent this winter and may cost $400 million to retain. 
So? 
The Dodgers have that much in their couch cushions. 
The Dodgers' injury-scarred rotation needed a stud starting pitcher like Skubal and, as this column noted last month, there was no excuse for the baseball's wealthiest and smartest team not to grab him. 
So they grabbed him. 
Of course they did. 
They are rushing full bore toward that three-peat and, to the delight of the most appreciative fans in baseball, nothing is going to get in their way. 
The rest of baseball will hate them for this. 
They don't care. 
Critics will say this is yet another example of how they are ruining the game. 
They could give a rip. 
A move like this  the insanely rich getting insanely richer  could be cited this winter as a reason for the game shutting down over a labor dispute. 
Not their problem. 
With a sore Shohei Ohtani looking increasingly doubtful for a meaningful October on the mound, with Blake Snell and Tyler Glasnow still sidelined with injuries, Skubal can slide into the No. 2-spot in a rotation that, if everyone gets healthy, could wind up being the best in baseball history. 
Of course, in the immortal words of Kobe Bryant, the job is not finished. 
There are still questions, even for a team that has all the answers. 
Skubal is a tremendous postseason pitcher, with a 2.04 ERA in six starts, but will his surgically repaired left elbow survive through his third postseason? 
After pushing 200 innings the last two seasons, he underwent a newfangled minimally invasive procedure on May 6 to remove a loose body from his elbow. 
Recovery time for a similar surgery performed the old-fashioned way is two to three months, but he was back on the mound in a game just a month later. 
Will this new operation hold up? 
Time will tell, but the Dodgers will be holding their breath. 
After Yoshinobu Yamamoto and Skubal, the Dodgers have another potentially big question. 
What do they do about Ohtani? 
He's got a balky knee, and now a painful biceps, and the Dodgers have kept him off the mound for a moment, but what happens in October? 
By acquiring Skubal, the Dodgers can afford to pull Ohtani out of the rotation altogether and allow him to focus on hitting, which has taken a bit of a hit with the pitching issues. 
But would he accept such a move, which might feel like a demotion? 
Ohtani has always put winning first, but he also began the season openly acknowledging his quest for a Cy Young award. 
So there’s that. 
The Dodgers will still need some good fortune to round out the rotation. 
They say Snell and Glasnow are both on the verge of returning from what has essentially been season-long injuries. 
But they’ll both be 33 in October, so only believe what you see. 
Roki Sasaki has been tremendous since the All-Star break  that new glove has been a giant success  but he’s still never started a postseason game. 
And for all his surprise greatness this summer, Justin Wrobleski has also yet to start a postseason game. 
It all could get interesting. 
But it shouldn’t be suspenseful. 
Skubal solves all mysteries. 
Skubal ends all arguments. 
Skubal saves the summer. 
The Dodgers are the most championship-driven and fan-devoted team in all of sports. 
They will do whatever it takes, however it takes, whenever it takes, to win. 
Five words that unequivocally prove it. 
Tarik Skubal is a Dodger. 
©2026 Los Angeles Times. 
Visit latimes.com. 
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.1%Tribune News Service: 2.5%Baltimore Sun: 2.0%Confirmation Bias11.1%This article: 1.9%Tribune News Service: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Anchoring Bias1.9%This article: 4.3%Tribune News Service: 2.9%Baltimore Sun: 1.8%Availability Heuristic4.3%This article: 1.6%Tribune News Service: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic1.6%This article: 5.4%Tribune News Service: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Hindsight Bias5.4%This article: 16.6%Tribune News Service: 2.2%Baltimore Sun: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias16.6%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 1.9%Baltimore Sun: 3.2%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%Tribune News Service: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.8%This article: 5.3%Tribune News Service: 1.6%Baltimore Sun: 2.5%Optimism Bias5.3%This article: 5.5%Tribune News Service: 1.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Pessimism Bias5.5%This article: 1.1%Tribune News Service: 4.4%Baltimore Sun: 5.1%Negativity Bias1.1%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.9%Baltimore Sun: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Tribune News Service: 0.9%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error4.1%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 1.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Tribune News Service: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.4%This article: 10.4%Tribune News Service: 1.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.3%Halo Effect10.4%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.4%Tribune News Service: 0.9%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Recency Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 1.9%Tribune News Service: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Straw Man1.9%This article: 2.6%Tribune News Service: 3.1%Baltimore Sun: 1.9%Appeal to Authority2.6%This article: 17.6%Tribune News Service: 0.7%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%False Dilemma17.6%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.6%Tribune News Service: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.6%This article: 6.6%Tribune News Service: 3.9%Baltimore Sun: 2.3%Hasty Generalization6.6%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.4%Tribune News Service: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Bandwagon1.4%This article: 12.3%Tribune News Service: 4.0%Baltimore Sun: 2.4%Appeal to Emotion12.3%This article: 1.8%Tribune News Service: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Begging the Question1.8%This article: 3.6%Tribune News Service: 1.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.6%This article: 0.4%Tribune News Service: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.4%This article: 0.3%Tribune News Service: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.3%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.3%Tribune News Service: 2.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Anecdotal2.3%This article: 0.5%Tribune News Service: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.5%This article: 3.8%Tribune News Service: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.8%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.4%Tribune News Service: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Unattributed Quote2.4%This article: 0.6%Tribune News Service: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.6%This article: 49.7%Tribune News Service: 3.5%Baltimore Sun: 2.0%Biased Writer Voice49.7%This article: 1.1%Tribune News Service: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Indoctrination1.1%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tribune News Service: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Tribune News Service: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.1%

799 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.