‘We made history’: Dugout launch first in recent memory 33%

By Amelia Schafer37% ICT37%

7/19/2026, 4:30:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 180 hits. Analysis detected 1,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 943 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.5% and a BS Rank of 33% (14,721 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 67.30% of the article peer group.

Stepping out of a traditional dugout canoe, called Maeqtek-ōs in the Menominee language, canoe creator Wayne Swett raised his fist high in the air and proudly proclaimed: “We made history.” 
Until Wednesday, no one could remember the last time Menominee people paddled a dugout canoe down the Menominee River. 
That very question drove a group of Menominee water protectors, led by Dawn M. 
Wilber and Swett, to launch a dugout. 
Making history on the Menominee River 
Since June 15, Wilber, Swett and several community members have camped on the banks of the river, burning, scrapping, debarking and sanding a 17-foot-long pine log into a traditional canoe. 
They did their work in the Chappee Webster Learning Center, a historic 1824 trading post located in their ancestral homelands in a place that is central to Menominee culture. 
“(This) has been a long time coming,” said Oralann Caldwell, a Menominee and Anishinaabe elder who traveled over 60 miles from Keshena, Wisconsin, to attend. 
“It’s about time that door is reopened.” 
To the north are Menominee burial mounds, a traditional dance ring and the largest Indigenous agricultural site in the eastern United States. 
To the south is the Menominee peoples’ birthplace, the mouth of the Menominee River where it meets Lake Michigan. 
Two Menominees paddle a traditional dugout canoe around the Menominee River on July 15 as part of a historic journey to bring the traditional boat back to Menominee homelands. 
(Amelia Schafer / ICT) 
“I am beyond excited,” Swett said. 
“The ancestors are happy. 
The river’s happy. 
The fish are happy. 
The creator’s happy. 
Everybody’s happy. 
I’m beyond happy because my work is done.” 
The canoe’s construction took two weeks longer than scheduled, delayed by intense heatwaves gripping much of the Midwest. 
Overall, it took exactly one month to complete the massive boat. 
“It was definitely a test because we had to deal with the heat, 100-degree heat,” Swett said. 
“We had to deal with storms. 
There’s times where we had to call a rain day and then a heat day. 
 It’s a weight off my shoulders.” 
The canoe belongs to the community, Wilber said. 
“I’m thinking about our ancestors, I’m thinking about what they did, how much time that they would put into stuff like this, and how they would sacrifice themselves because a canoe is communal,” Wilber said. 
“When it’s made, it doesn’t take ownership. 
It’s for everybody, everybody to use in the community. 
So it wasn’t just like yours or mine. 
That’s the purpose of it.” 
Dawn M. 
Wilber, Menominee, smiles after successfully paddling a dugout canoe she helped create around the Menominee River on July 15. 
(Amelia Schafer / ICT) 
Prior to launching, a group of roughly a dozen community members gathered for a water ceremony to send the canoe off properly. 
Following the ceremony, canoe creators Swett and Wilber climbed into the canoe to be the first to paddle it. 
To their surprise, there were absolutely no leaks in the canoe. 
It floated perfectly. 
“I didn’t realize how emotionally beautiful it was. 
That’s what got me is the emotion,” said Wilber, who is Menominee. 
“Not just looking at her but feeling her and being able to give her her first drink today before we put her in the water.” 
Wilber and Swett paddled the canoe around the river before allowing community members to take it for a spin. 
Prior to colonization, countless Menominee families navigated the river in dugout canoes each day  as did countless other Indigenous families in the North American eastern woodlands. 
Initially, Swett and Wilber said, they planned to take the canoe out on the eighth annual canoe journey organized by their group, Protectors of the Menominee River. 
However, because of weather-related delays, Swett stayed and continued to work on the canoe during the four-day journey. 
Two Menominee citizens bask in the feeling of paddling a dugout canoe around the Menominee River, part of their ancestral homelands, on July 15. 
(Amelia Schafer / ICT) 
After a solid month of carving, burning and shaping the pine log into a full-fledged canoe, the end result was far more beautiful than anyone had anticipated. 
The sanded and finished inside revealed silhouettes of different woodland animals, a sign of all the animals who interacted with the tree during its century of existence, Caldwell said. 
Menominee elder Oralann Caldwell and another community member take off paddling in the dugout canoe on July 15. 
(Amelia Schafer / ICT) 
“It’s like an imprint, a reflection to us,” Caldwell said. 
“The spirits of all those animals were out there. 
It’s a love, an honor, a respect. 
It’s a love for our culture, for our mother (earth).” 
Caldwell said inside she spotted silhouettes of a wolf, a bear, a snake and a red-tailed hawk. 
Other community members pointed out different animal shapes as well, she said. 
“The animals: birds, four leggeds, were all with us,” Caldwell said. 
She said she and Wilber were struck by the sheer number of community members who supported them during their journey and helped work on the canoe. 
“All of the love, all of the gratitude, all of the giving, all of the sharing, everybody, and just everything that everybody has done for us,” Wilber said. 
Later this year, the Protectors of the Menominee River plan to use the canoe to harvest wild rice, Wilber said. 
“We are the original caretakers of the land, and we’re still doing it,” Caldwell said. 
Cedar Fernandez, Menominee, smiles as they paddle around in a traditional dugout canoe. 
Canoes like these were used by their Menominee ancestors for thousands of years. 
(Amelia Schafer / ICT) 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.1%Amelia Schafer: 3.1%Wisconsin Watch: 2.1%Confirmation Bias8.1%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Amelia Schafer: 2.2%Wisconsin Watch: 2.2%Availability Heuristic4.7%This article: 2.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.7%Wisconsin Watch: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic2.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Amelia Schafer: 2.1%Wisconsin Watch: 3.8%Framing Effect4.7%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.3%Amelia Schafer: 0.8%Wisconsin Watch: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.4%Amelia Schafer: 6.2%Wisconsin Watch: 2.5%Optimism Bias9.4%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.7%Amelia Schafer: 0.2%Wisconsin Watch: 5.3%Negativity Bias0.7%This article: 3.8%Amelia Schafer: 1.6%Wisconsin Watch: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias3.8%This article: 3.8%Amelia Schafer: 1.3%Wisconsin Watch: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error3.8%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 12.0%Amelia Schafer: 7.2%Wisconsin Watch: 1.1%In-Group Bias12.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Amelia Schafer: 2.6%Wisconsin Watch: 1.6%Halo Effect7.7%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.9%Amelia Schafer: 2.3%Wisconsin Watch: 3.1%Appeal to Authority6.9%This article: 0.8%Amelia Schafer: 0.3%Wisconsin Watch: 1.2%False Dilemma0.8%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.5%Amelia Schafer: 0.2%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.5%This article: 6.4%Amelia Schafer: 3.1%Wisconsin Watch: 2.3%Hasty Generalization6.4%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 19.1%Amelia Schafer: 13.0%Wisconsin Watch: 4.0%Appeal to Emotion19.1%This article: 0.7%Amelia Schafer: 0.2%Wisconsin Watch: 0.5%Begging the Question0.7%This article: 3.4%Amelia Schafer: 1.1%Wisconsin Watch: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.4%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.4%Amelia Schafer: 1.1%Wisconsin Watch: 0.3%Burden of Proof3.4%This article: 6.6%Amelia Schafer: 3.2%Wisconsin Watch: 0.4%Appeal to Nature6.6%This article: 1.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.3%Wisconsin Watch: 0.3%Composition/Division1.0%This article: 7.3%Amelia Schafer: 2.9%Wisconsin Watch: 2.8%Anecdotal7.3%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.2%Amelia Schafer: 1.4%Wisconsin Watch: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection3.2%This article: 5.8%Amelia Schafer: 3.4%Wisconsin Watch: 1.3%Biased Writer Voice5.8%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amelia Schafer: 0.0%Wisconsin Watch: 1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

943 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers57%attributed speech408writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWayne Swett • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDawn M. Wilber • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDawn M. Wilber • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageOralann Caldwell • 25 words • 100.0% coverageOralann Caldwell • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWayne Swett • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWayne Swett • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWayne Swett • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWayne Swett • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWayne Swett • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWayne Swett • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWayne Swett • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWayne Swett • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWayne Swett • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWayne Swett • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWayne Swett • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDawn M. Wilber • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDawn M. Wilber • 35 words • 0.0% coverageDawn M. Wilber • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDawn M. Wilber • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDawn M. Wilber • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDawn M. Wilber • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDawn M. Wilber • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageDawn M. Wilber • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDawn M. Wilber • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDawn M. Wilber • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageOralann Caldwell • 29 words • 0.0% coverageOralann Caldwell • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageOralann Caldwell • 10 words • 0.0% coverageOralann Caldwell • 9 words • 0.0% coverageOralann Caldwell • 7 words • 0.0% coverageOralann Caldwell • 10 words • 0.0% coverageOralann Caldwell • 17 words • 0.0% coverageOralann Caldwell • 12 words • 0.0% coverageOralann Caldwell • 11 words • 0.0% coverageOralann Caldwell • 26 words • 0.0% coverageDawn M. Wilber • 28 words • 0.0% coverageDawn M. Wilber • 20 words • 0.0% coverageOralann Caldwell • 15 words • 0.0% coverageCedar Fernandez • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Wayne Swett

80%flagged-word coverage
105 attributed words20% of attributed speech61% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Quote-first Misdirection+28.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Wayne Swett: 28.6%28.6%Biased Writer Voice+28.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Wayne Swett: 28.6%28.6%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.