Hilary Duff Tries Malört At Chicago Area Show: ‘Disgusting’ 17%

By Lucia Preziosi18%

7/30/2026, 1:10:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 479 faulty-reasoning hits from 344 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26% and a BS Rank of 17% (23,582 of 28,118 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the article peer group.

CHICAGO  Fermented back sweat. 
Stomach bile. 
Grapefruit rind and pencil shavings. 
Those are just a few of the phrases people have used to describe the taste of Chicago’s famous liqueur, Jeppson’s Malört . 
For actress and singer Hilary Duff, one word comes to mind: disgusting. 
Duff, who came to fame in the early 2000s Disney Channel show “Lizzie McGuire,” had her first taste of Malört while onstage Sunday at the Credit Union 1 Amphitheatre in Tinley Park, a stop on her nationwide “Lucky Me” tour. 
Raising her shot to the cheering crowd with a fearful look on her face, Duff clinked glasses with members of her band before bravely throwing back the whole shot of the wormwood liqueur. 
She then fell to her knees, covering her mouth and waving her hand in disgust before reaching for a pink water bottle to wash it all down. 
“Whoa, that is disgusting,” Duff said to the crowd after clearing her throat into the microphone and wagging her finger in disapproval. 
“I think you’re supposed to have pickle juice or something to make it better?” 
Duff then asked, garnering a fair share of “boos” from the crowd. 
“I’d rather drink a whole jar of pickle juice than that.” 
Chicagoans who partake in Malört often don’t chase the Chicago-made liqueur, rather embracing its funky taste on its own or washing it down with an Old Style for a classic Chicago Handshake. 
Days after Duff’s concert, discourse continues on social media. 
“That ain’t malort… I can tell by the color,” one person speculated. 
“It was whiskey,” another said. 
Others are adamant it was Malört and applauded Duff for her bravery. 
“Honestly—rock and roll 👏,” read one comment. 
Commenters who’ve experienced the liqueur themselves said Duff’s reaction appeared to be genuine. 
“i’ve been there, it taste like something you’d clean a car engine with, I really miss Chicago,” one commenter said. 
Jeppson’s Malort, for its part, posted the video on its Instagram with this caption: “We still love you @hilaryduff 🫶.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.5%Lucia Preziosi: 0.1%Block Club Chicago: 1.4%Confirmation Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 15.7%Lucia Preziosi: 1.7%Block Club Chicago: 2.1%Availability Heuristic15.7%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 1.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.2%Block Club Chicago: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Lucia Preziosi: 1.2%Block Club Chicago: 2.5%Framing Effect6.1%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.2%Block Club Chicago: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.5%Block Club Chicago: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.1%Lucia Preziosi: 0.7%Block Club Chicago: 3.2%Optimism Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 22.7%Lucia Preziosi: 1.0%Block Club Chicago: 3.8%Negativity Bias22.7%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.4%Block Club Chicago: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 9.6%Lucia Preziosi: 0.6%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias9.6%This article: 9.3%Lucia Preziosi: 2.0%Block Club Chicago: 1.2%In-Group Bias9.3%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Lucia Preziosi: 8.5%Block Club Chicago: 3.3%Halo Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.6%Lucia Preziosi: 0.9%Block Club Chicago: 0.9%Recency Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.2%Block Club Chicago: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 1.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.3%Lucia Preziosi: 2.3%Block Club Chicago: 1.9%Hasty Generalization9.3%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 7.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.2%Block Club Chicago: 0.6%Bandwagon7.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.9%Block Club Chicago: 3.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.6%Block Club Chicago: 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.7%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 16.0%Lucia Preziosi: 2.7%Block Club Chicago: 2.3%Anecdotal16.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.9%Lucia Preziosi: 0.6%Block Club Chicago: 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.9%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.8%Lucia Preziosi: 1.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.9%Unattributed Quote12.8%This article: 3.5%Lucia Preziosi: 0.7%Block Club Chicago: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection3.5%This article: 2.6%Lucia Preziosi: 0.2%Block Club Chicago: 1.2%Biased Writer Voice2.6%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.1%Block Club Chicago: 0.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucia Preziosi: 0.0%Block Club Chicago: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Lucia Preziosi: 1.2%Block Club Chicago: 2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.8%

344 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers19%attributed speech277writer words
Selected voice

Jeppson’s Malort

100%flagged-word coverage
20 attributed words30% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jeppson’s Malort: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-15.9 ptsWriter: 15.9%Jeppson’s Malort: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%Jeppson’s Malort: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%Jeppson’s Malort: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.