Harriette Cole: My parents don’t understand how hard I work 54%

By Harriette Cole52%

7/21/2026, 2:00:36 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Confirmation Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 846 faulty-reasoning hits from 559 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.5% and a BS Rank of 54% (10,065 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the article peer group.

DEAR HARRIETTE: I am a 44-year-old woman with kids, a job and a house, and I still feel like that’s never enough for my parents. 
They always want more from me. 
Ever since I was a little girl, I was never good enough. 
I’m the only one in my family to have graduated high school, obtained a college degree and have a career. 
My parents never supported me through schooling, telling me that an education is a privilege, not a right. 
They don’t understand how hard I have worked, especially as a single mother, and they constantly start fights. 
We will get into arguments over me not being able to bring the kids over, working too much, not calling enough, etc. 
How can I have a healthy relationship with them if they don’t understand me? 
Do you have any advice on how to tune them out? 
 Impressing Parents 
DEAR IMPRESSING PARENTS: It seems that your parents are putting all of their hopes and dreams on you. 
That is a heavy burden. 
Before you tune them out, try to talk to them. 
Remind them of how you have built your life and that some sacrifices come with that. 
You are not as available as they would like because you are building a career. 
This doesn’t mean you don’t love them. 
Maybe they can help. 
Could they come over more? 
Pick up the kids and spend time with them? 
Give them options for their involvement. 
DEAR HARRIETTE: My best friend booked a trip, and she’s going to be gone on my birthday. 
I have been planning my 30th birthday for four months; I put so much time and effort into planning it, and she won’t be attending. 
We’ve been friends for eight years, and I just assumed that she was going to be there. 
I asked her why she scheduled her vacation during this time knowing that I have my party planned, and she said it was the only time that worked for her schedule. 
I understand that people have busy lives and that vacations often have to be planned around work, family and finances, but I can't help but feel hurt. 
Part of me feels like if attending my birthday was important to her, she would have found another time to travel. 
Another part of me wonders whether I'm expecting too much and whether I'm making this more personal than it really is. 
I don’t want to start an argument or make her feel guilty for taking a trip, but I'm sad and disappointed she can't be there with me to celebrate. 
Do you think I’m overreacting and having too high of expectations of my friend or is it fair to be this upset? 
 Not a Good Friend 
DEAR NOT A GOOD FRIEND: You have every right to feel hurt. 
Your best friend was well aware of your trip. 
That said, it’s time to pivot. 
Go back to your party. 
Focus on all the details that make you happy. 
You can tell your friend how hurt you are, but move on. 
Harriette Cole is a lifestylist and founder of DREAMLEAPERS, an initiative to help people access and activate their dreams. 
You can send questions to askharriette@harriettecole.com or c/o Andrews McMeel Syndication, 1130 Walnut St., Kansas City, MO 64106. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.1%Harriette Cole: 3.2%East Bay Times: 2.9%Confirmation Bias14.1%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.5%East Bay Times: 0.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Harriette Cole: 2.2%East Bay Times: 2.6%Availability Heuristic3.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.5%East Bay Times: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.2%East Bay Times: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Harriette Cole: 1.0%East Bay Times: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias3.9%This article: 2.0%Harriette Cole: 0.8%East Bay Times: 3.5%Framing Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.5%East Bay Times: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.2%East Bay Times: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Harriette Cole: 1.5%East Bay Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect4.5%This article: 3.6%Harriette Cole: 3.1%East Bay Times: 2.0%Optimism Bias3.6%This article: 14.0%Harriette Cole: 2.0%East Bay Times: 1.3%Pessimism Bias14.0%This article: 18.8%Harriette Cole: 7.5%East Bay Times: 7.9%Negativity Bias18.8%This article: 3.6%Harriette Cole: 2.5%East Bay Times: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias3.6%This article: 11.8%Harriette Cole: 4.7%East Bay Times: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error11.8%This article: 2.7%Harriette Cole: 1.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.2%East Bay Times: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.2%East Bay Times: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 1.1%East Bay Times: 7.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.8%East Bay Times: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Harriette Cole: 0.8%East Bay Times: 0.4%Primacy Effect2.1%This article: 3.8%Harriette Cole: 0.9%East Bay Times: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.4%East Bay Times: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 1.0%East Bay Times: 2.5%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 6.4%Harriette Cole: 4.2%East Bay Times: 1.1%False Dilemma6.4%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 3.2%East Bay Times: 3.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.2%East Bay Times: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.2%Harriette Cole: 1.2%East Bay Times: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion5.2%This article: 3.8%Harriette Cole: 0.7%East Bay Times: 0.5%Begging the Question3.8%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 1.6%East Bay Times: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.6%Harriette Cole: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.6%Burden of Proof1.6%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.3%East Bay Times: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.8%East Bay Times: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.7%Harriette Cole: 1.4%East Bay Times: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.7%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.8%Harriette Cole: 0.4%East Bay Times: 0.1%Middle Ground3.8%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.4%Harriette Cole: 1.2%East Bay Times: 1.0%Unattributed Quote10.4%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.7%Harriette Cole: 1.9%East Bay Times: 8.1%Biased Writer Voice7.7%This article: 18.8%Harriette Cole: 14.3%East Bay Times: 2.8%Indoctrination18.8%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%East Bay Times: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Harriette Cole: 2.2%East Bay Times: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.2%

559 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker3.4%attributed speech540writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageHarriette Cole • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Harriette Cole

0%flagged-word coverage
19 attributed words100% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Indoctrination-19.4 ptsWriter: 19.4%Harriette Cole: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-10.7 ptsWriter: 10.7%Harriette Cole: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.0 ptsWriter: 8.0%Harriette Cole: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.3 ptsWriter: 3.3%Harriette Cole: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.