1 dead in head-on crash on I-70 near Utah border 3%

By Nick Coltrain3%

7/20/2026, 9:11:15 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 3 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic and Negativity Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 13 hits. Analysis detected 34 faulty-reasoning hits from 167 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 14% and a BS Rank of 3% (21,364 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the article peer group.

A head-on crash on Interstate 70 near the Utah border killed at least one person Monday morning, according to the Colorado State Patrol. 
The crash involved a tan Subaru Outback and a white Ford F-150 just west of Loma at about 11:36 a.m. 
The Subaru caught fire afterward, according to a news release. 
The driver of the Subaru died on the scene. 
At least five people, including two minors, were in the Ford. 
All five were taken to a local hospital. 
CSP did not have the extent of injuries for the people in the Ford. 
The crash closed westbound I-70 near mile marker 4. 
The interstate was still closed as of 2:30 p.m. 
Monday. 
The identity of the Subaru driver will be released by the Mesa County coroner once next of kin have been notified. 
CSP is still investigating the cause of the crash. 
Sign up to get crime news sent straight to your inbox each day. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Nick Coltrain: 2.2%Baltimore Sun: 2.5%Availability Heuristic6.6%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 4.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 2.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%Nick Coltrain: 2.0%Baltimore Sun: 7.6%Negativity Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 2.5%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 3.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 3.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 2.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 3.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 2.6%Baltimore Sun: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nick Coltrain: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Nick Coltrain: 7.8%Baltimore Sun: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.8%

167 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.