NY Post89%

Sunken Alcatraz Boat found in San Francisco Bay ocean 29%

By Daniel Farr69%

7/18/2026, 12:55:41 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 709 faulty-reasoning hits from 459 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.7% and a BS Rank of 29% (14,525 of 20,370 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the article peer group.

The doomed family memorial boat that sunk near Alcatraz has been found lying 130 feet beneath San Francisco Bay, but the wreck is so deep that crews are still deciding whether it can safely be brought back to the surface. 
The San Francisco Police Department announced Friday that its Marine Unit tracked down the sunken 49-foot cabin cruiser, Volare, after days of searching with boat-mounted sonar following Tuesday’s deadly disaster. 
Police are now using a remotely operated underwater vehicle to inspect the wreckage while working with partner agencies to determine whether the vessel can safely be raised. 
The Volare is resting between 120 and 130 feet below the surface in a heavily dredged shipping channel about 600 yards west of Alcatraz Island. 
Witnesses reported some passengers were hurled into the frigid bay while others appeared trapped inside the lower cabin as the boat disappeared beneath the surface. 
Only about half of those aboard were wearing life jackets. 
Nearby civilian boaters, along with crews from the San Francisco Police Department, San Francisco Fire Department and the US Coast Guard, rescued 16 people from the water. 
Boat owner, captain, and US Navy veteran John Boisa survived the sinking. 
His older brother, 79-year-old Clifford Joseph Boisa of Sutter County, was rescued alive Tuesday but later died from cardiac arrest and exposure. 
The second confirmed victim, 58-year-old Tondra Miller, also known as Tondra Madruga, of Sacramento County, was found Thursday afternoon floating near Treasure Island after being spotted by a passing vessel. 
Two family members remain missing and are presumed dead: Clifford’s wife, Jackie Boisa, and his sister, Carol Boisa. 
The Coast Guard ended its desperate search Wednesday evening after covering more than 950 square nautical miles. 
The mission has since shifted to recovery efforts. 
Getting the boat back will not be easy. 
Resting 120 to 130 feet below the surface in dark, fast-moving water, the vessel is beyond the range of local public safety dive teams. 
At that depth, standard scuba diving carries serious risks, including nitrogen narcosis and lengthy decompression requirements, forcing crews to rely on specialized salvage divers, custom gas mixtures such as Trimix and remotely operated vehicles. 
For now, investigators are relying on sonar and underwater robots as the recovery effort continues for the two missing family members. 
Police said the investigation into what caused the Volare to sink remains ongoing. 
“Our hearts go out to all the individuals involved in this tragic incident,” the San Francisco Police Department said in a statement. 
“The SFPD would like to thank all our partner agencies and members of the public for their quick actions during the rescue and for their tireless work on the response and search for the missing individuals. 
” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.5%Daniel Farr: 3.7%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 1.3%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Daniel Farr: 4.7%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic7.4%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 1.1%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.6%California Post: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.5%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Daniel Farr: 12.8%California Post: 10.4%Framing Effect5.2%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 1.2%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.6%Daniel Farr: 0.9%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 1.3%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.4%Daniel Farr: 1.5%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias14.4%This article: 20.9%Daniel Farr: 17.6%California Post: 16.1%Negativity Bias20.9%This article: 7.8%Daniel Farr: 0.9%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias7.8%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 1.5%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.2%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 1.0%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.9%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Daniel Farr: 2.2%California Post: 3.0%Halo Effect2.6%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.5%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 1.7%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.4%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 2.2%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.2%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 3.1%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 1.5%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 7.4%Daniel Farr: 0.7%California Post: 1.0%Slippery Slope7.4%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.2%Daniel Farr: 4.0%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization2.2%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.7%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.5%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.3%Daniel Farr: 8.4%California Post: 9.0%Appeal to Emotion16.3%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.6%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.8%Daniel Farr: 2.3%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.8%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.9%Daniel Farr: 0.7%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof3.9%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.4%Daniel Farr: 2.0%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal5.4%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.1%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 22.9%Daniel Farr: 1.7%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)22.9%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.6%Daniel Farr: 0.1%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground4.6%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.3%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.8%Daniel Farr: 2.5%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote7.8%This article: 4.8%Daniel Farr: 1.9%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection4.8%This article: 4.8%Daniel Farr: 12.4%California Post: 13.2%Biased Writer Voice4.8%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 1.6%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.3%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 3.9%California Post: 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.7%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

459 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker19%attributed speech371writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageSan Francisco Police Department • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageSan Francisco Police Department • 22 words • 100.0% coverageSan Francisco Police Department • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
88 attributed words100% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Unattributed Quote+40.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%San Francisco Police Department: 40.9%40.9%Quote-first Misdirection+25.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%San Francisco Police Department: 25.0%25.0%Biased Writer Voice+25.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%San Francisco Police Department: 25.0%25.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.