Driver fatally shot by ICE in Biddeford was ‘not the target,’ King spokesman says ⁠22%

By Bryan Hecht⁠27%

7/14/2026, 11:58:21 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 41.3% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 285 faulty-reasoning hits from 155 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (17,071 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the article peer group.

The man shot and killed by an ICE agent in Biddeford, Maine on Monday was “not the target,” of immigration officials deportation investigation, according to Matthew Felling, a spokesperson for Senator Angus King. 
The man, who Felling identified as Joan Sebastian Guerrero, was a 26-year-old Colombian national living in the United States with valid work authorization, according to a pair of immigrants’s rights groups. 
According to Felling, in an earlier phone conversation Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin told Senator King on Monday that Guerrero was the target of an arrest warrant and deportation order. 
But hours later, Felling said, Mullin updated King that the man in fact was “not the target of the warrant.” 
It is not clear how Guerrero ended up targeted by immigrations officers, nor who the intended target was. 
<i>This is a developing story and will be updated.</i> 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.9%Bryan Hecht: 4.4%Boston Globe: 3.0%Confirmation Bias12.9%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 4.2%Boston Globe: 3.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 20.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.7%Boston Globe: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic20.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.2%Boston Globe: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Bryan Hecht: 0.8%Boston Globe: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias5.8%This article: 9.0%Bryan Hecht: 2.8%Boston Globe: 5.2%Framing Effect9.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.6%Boston Globe: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 1.1%Boston Globe: 2.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 1.5%Boston Globe: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.6%Bryan Hecht: 5.2%Boston Globe: 7.9%Negativity Bias11.6%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 2.8%Boston Globe: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.9%Boston Globe: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.2%Boston Globe: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 7.8%Boston Globe: 4.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 21.9%Bryan Hecht: 1.5%Boston Globe: 1.4%Recency Bias21.9%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.2%Boston Globe: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.3%Boston Globe: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 19.4%Bryan Hecht: 3.1%Boston Globe: 3.8%Appeal to Authority19.4%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 1.1%Boston Globe: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.3%Boston Globe: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 2.2%Boston Globe: 2.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.1%Boston Globe: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 5.7%Boston Globe: 5.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 1.3%Boston Globe: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 2.4%Boston Globe: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.2%Boston Globe: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.4%Boston Globe: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.2%Boston Globe: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.3%Boston Globe: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 1.4%Boston Globe: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.6%Bryan Hecht: 2.2%Boston Globe: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.6%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.2%Boston Globe: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.1%Boston Globe: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 41.3%Bryan Hecht: 1.0%Boston Globe: 1.5%Unattributed Quote41.3%This article: 9.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.8%Boston Globe: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection9.0%This article: 21.3%Bryan Hecht: 0.9%Boston Globe: 2.1%Biased Writer Voice21.3%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.3%Boston Globe: 0.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.0%Boston Globe: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bryan Hecht: 0.6%Boston Globe: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

155 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers74%attributed speech41writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageMatthew Felling • 33 words • 100.0% coverageJoan Sebastian Guerrero • 31 words • 100.0% coverageMatthew Felling • 30 words • 0.0% coverageMatthew Felling • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
31 attributed words27% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Joan Sebastian Guerrero: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection-34.1 ptsWriter: 34.1%Joan Sebastian Guerrero: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.