Chilling final message from Australian tourist before she vanished in Vegas three weeks ago 53%

By Nina Joudeh75%

7/14/2026, 1:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 367 faulty-reasoning hits from 388 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.8% and a BS Rank of 53% (10,348 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 52.70% of the article peer group.

An Australian tourist vanished after sending a final Facebook message saying she was heading out for a hike, with the 26-year-old now missing for more than three weeks. 
Sally Grace Contarino was last heard from on June 20, when she told a male friend on Facebook she was going to Lone Mountain for a hike, according to a Las Vegas Metropolitan Police report obtained by 8 News Now. 
Investigators said it is not known whether Contarino was with anyone at the time. 
Police have previously warned she “might possibly be in severe emotional distress and in need of medical assistance.” 
Authorities said she was last known near 9700 West Skye Canyon Drive at around 1 p.m. on June 20. 
The area in northwest Las Vegas is close to a busy intersection with fast-food restaurants, a gas station, and other businesses. 
The missing persons report was first made to Victoria Police, which then notified Interpol US. 
The Deputy Consul-General from the Australian Consulate in Los Angeles also contacted Las Vegas Metro Police, according to the report. 
Contarino’s family, including her sister, has since traveled to Las Vegas to find her and learn what happened. 
The search has also drawn in Australian authorities after the missing persons report was first made to Victoria Police, which then notified Interpol US. 
The Deputy Consul-General from the Australian Consulate in Los Angeles also contacted Las Vegas Metro Police, according to the report. 
Contarino appeared in the mysterious video outside a 7-Eleven on Boulder Highway near Flamingo Road, where a man known as “@epicdamianpov” approached her while she smoked a cigarette. 
In the clip, he says, “Hello. 
Sorry, I saw you. 
I just saw that you were very beautiful. 
I was wondering if I could get your number, by chance.” 
Contarino smiles before replying, “I have a boyfriend.” 
“Oh, okay, yeah, of course,” the man says before walking away. 
The video, later shared by “Real Vegas Locals,” had been viewed more than 814,000 times on Instagram as of July 13. 
Police said Contarino was last seen wearing a gray-blue sweatshirt, jean shorts, black-and-white shoes and carrying a purse. 
She is described as having brown hair and brown eyes, standing about 5 feet 5 inches tall and weighing around 130 pounds. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 2.9%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.8%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Nina Joudeh: 3.9%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic7.2%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 1.5%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.5%California Post: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.7%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Nina Joudeh: 14.0%California Post: 10.3%Framing Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 1.4%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 1.1%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.3%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 2.7%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 2.8%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Nina Joudeh: 17.6%California Post: 16.0%Negativity Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 3.7%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 1.5%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.2%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.7%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 1.8%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 1.7%California Post: 3.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.1%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 1.7%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.7%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.1%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 5.0%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.2%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 18.8%Nina Joudeh: 2.7%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority18.8%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 1.3%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 1.0%California Post: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 5.1%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.3%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 5.4%Nina Joudeh: 0.7%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon5.4%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 7.3%California Post: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.4%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.2%Nina Joudeh: 2.3%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.2%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.3%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 4.2%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 1.4%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.3%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.4%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.8%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 30.2%Nina Joudeh: 3.8%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote30.2%This article: 1.5%Nina Joudeh: 2.1%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection1.5%This article: 18.0%Nina Joudeh: 15.2%California Post: 13.1%Biased Writer Voice18.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.7%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.7%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 4.4%California Post: 3.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Nina Joudeh: 0.8%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

388 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.