Boy 22%

By Chris Bradford73%

7/13/2026, 12:47:29 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 223 faulty-reasoning hits from 426 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.8% and a BS Rank of 22% (16,550 of 21,180 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.10% of the article peer group.

See more of our coverage in your search results. 
Add The New York Post on Google 
A 13-year-old boy was gunned down while having a sleepover with his friends when the house they were in was shot up in a suspected gang hit that also killed a man there. 
Demarcus Shirley, 13, was caught in the crossfire when dozens of shots were fired into the home in Gresham Park, Georgia, at around 4 a.m. on July 2 in a drive-by attack that also killed Chauncey Newman, 45, and a dog, Atlanta News First reported. 
“He had a lot of life in front of him. 
He was a loved member of our family,” his great-uncle Greg Carthon said. 
Demarcus Shirley, 13, was killed after the home he was staying in was shot at. 
Family handout 
Investigators have not revealed the motive behind the shooting, but gang involvement was “likely,” according to an arrest warrant seen by KPTV. 
But Shirley’s pals have denied that he was involved in gang culture. 
“He wasn’t in the streets at all. 
He’s just a funny little kid who liked to run around and play like a normal little kid,” Larry Bell-Ware, one of the kids with him at the sleepover, insisted. 
“Demarcus had too much to live. 
He died too young,” he said. 
Shirley was having an innocent slumber party with friends when the shots rang out as they slept, according to Larenzo Pinkins, the pal who found him. 
“We had come upstairs, and I had seen him, and I tried to grab him, and he was dead,” Pinkins told 11Alive of the pal who was “really like my little brother for real.” 
Chauncey Newman, 45, was killed. 
Family handout 
Alleged gunman Keyshun Webb has since been arrested. 
DeKalb County Sheriff's Office 
Keyshun Webb, 21, has since been charged with two counts of murder for killing the young teen and Newman. 
Webb was also slapped with eight counts of aggravated assault, and an animal cruelty charge. 
Shots were fired from a car Webb was driving around the time of the shooting, according to the warrant. 
Bullet holes and blood was seen on the outside of the home. 
WSMV-TV 
Webb was also allegedly involved in another drive-by shooting on the same day, the warrant says. 
Cops suspect four people, including Webb, and two cars were involved in the shootings. 
The other suspects have not been identified. 
“The DeKalb County Sheriff’s Office remains committed to ensuring individuals accused of violent crimes are located and brought into custody,” DeKalb County Sheriff Melody Maddox said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.8%Chris Bradford: 4.1%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias2.8%This article: 5.2%Chris Bradford: 2.0%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias5.2%This article: 3.8%Chris Bradford: 3.5%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic3.8%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 1.0%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 1.5%California Post: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 3.5%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Chris Bradford: 10.7%California Post: 10.4%Framing Effect6.1%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.4%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.4%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 1.7%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 1.7%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 21.1%Chris Bradford: 16.2%California Post: 16.1%Negativity Bias21.1%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 2.2%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.9%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.5%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 1.3%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 1.7%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 1.3%California Post: 3.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.3%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 1.0%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.8%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 3.3%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.0%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 4.4%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.6%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.4%California Post: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 4.9%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.1%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.3%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.4%Chris Bradford: 11.5%California Post: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion9.4%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.8%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 3.3%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.9%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.3%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 3.8%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 1.6%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.1%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.2%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.1%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 4.8%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.3%Chris Bradford: 3.4%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection2.3%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 11.6%California Post: 13.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 1.3%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 0.5%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chris Bradford: 3.5%California Post: 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Chris Bradford: 0.8%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.6%

426 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers31%attributed speech294writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageGreg Carthon • 10 words • 100.0% coverageGreg Carthon • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Bell-Ware • 7 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Bell-Ware • 30 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Bell-Ware • 6 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Bell-Ware • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageLarenzo Pinkins • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMelody Maddox • 26 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Larenzo Pinkins

100%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words26% of attributed speech59% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.4 ptsWriter: 2.4%Larenzo Pinkins: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.