spiked93%

RIP Ann Widdecombe  and shame on her haters - spiked 66%

By Tom Slater94%

7/11/2026, 2:36:46 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 72.2% saturation with 807 hits. Analysis detected 3,866 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,118 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.7% and a BS Rank of 66% (7,602 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 65.30% of the article peer group.

Want unlimited, ad-free access? 
Become a spiked supporter . 
So we’re all clear now? 
It’s okay to celebrate the death of an elderly woman, provided she is right-wing. 
It’s okay to jump on a mainstream news channel while her body is barely cold and talk about how she was a ‘spinster’, an ‘old maid’ and probably a virgin. 
It’s okay to call her a bigot, too. 
But that one probably went without saying. 
You would have thought the death of Ann Widdecombe, former Tory MP turned Reform UK spokeswoman, would be treated by all as a moment of solemnity and horror. 
A murder investigation has now been launched, after she was found covered in blood, apparently bludgeoned to death, in her Dartmoor home, where the 78-year-old lived alone. 
A man was arrested yesterday on suspicion of murder, but has since been released without charge. 
But even before we learned that murder was suspected, Widdecombe’s sudden death was a jolt. 
She might have been semi-retired, last holding office as an MEP for the Brexit Party, but the irrepressible Widdecombe was still grabbing life. 
The day before she was found, cut down in what should have been a place of quiet, safety and peace, she gave an interview to Talk TV. 
She was planning to campaign for Reform leader Nigel Farage in Clacton. 
Politics was her life, right up until the end. 
As Rory Sutherland has noted , Widdecombe also belonged to a fast-fading line of parliamentarians  from Tony Benn to Norman Tebbit to Dennis Skinner  who were bombastic, formidable and utterly sincere; motored by duty, principle and unflappable conviction. 
People who would not dream of meekly reading a speech from their phone, or dispensing lines to take in the media. 
When they pass on, we lose more than just another public figure, who we may have loved or hated, agreed or disagreed with  we are losing a quality of politician which today’s culture seems all but incapable of replicating. 
Like a Second World War regiment whose ranks grow thinner with each Remembrance Sunday. 
Which is what made it particularly despicable to see the usual suspects reflexively respond to Widdecombe’s death  we didn’t know then it might be a murder  with a mix of glee, mirth and casual derision. 
‘Hurrah! 
Ann Widdecombe is strictly dead’ , screamed a since-deleted article in the Socialist Worker . 
Veteran LGBT activist Peter Tatchell , in a since-deleted tweet, took the opportunity to lambast Widdecombe for opposing ‘every gay law reform in 30 years’, signing it off with ‘BIGOT!’. 
This socialism of ghouls is something we have grimly come to expect. 
Today’s leftism has been infected by a hysterical intolerance and adolescent misanthropy that flares up whenever someone on the right dies  even when they are assassinated. 
The Socialist Worker also responded to the cold-blooded murder of American conservative activist Charlie Kirk with an article titled, ‘Charlie KKKirk’s chickens come home to roost’ . 
What was perhaps more surprising was Adam Boulton’s despicable mutterings on Sky News. 
Filling time in between police updates, the long-time political journalist felt moved to call Widdecombe a ‘spinster’ and an ‘old maid’ and re-air claims she was a virgin  a topic the fiercely private, devotedly Catholic Widdecombe refused to address publicly, despite endless prurient interest. 
Boulton has since said he was only dealing in ‘facts’. 
To which I would gently ask, would he think it appropriate if another talking head responded to his own untimely death by calling him a fat lump with all the sex appeal of a bean bag? 
That wouldn’t be on  would it, Adam? 
I don’t want him sacked. 
He can say whatever he likes. 
But there is such a thing as basic decency. 
Still, as we all know, that ceases to apply when conservatives die. 
Imagine if the details were different  if the death of a young, famously care-free Labour woman prompted televised musings of how she was a bit of a slag. 
The pundit would be lucky to ever darken a studio again. 
I can’t imagine the public has much sympathy for it, if the combination of shock and affection online is anything to go by. 
Widdecombe may have been an unapologetic social conservative. 
She may have opposed gay marriage  a pretty mainstream position until it suddenly became a damnable heresy 12-or-so years ago. 
She may once have been easy to caricature as some relic of a blue-rinse past we would do well to leave behind. 
But, in truth, she was more on the side of the people, common sense and genuine equality than her haters ever were. 
She rejected positive discrimination , because it patronises women and minorities. 
She backed Brexit, standing with the democratic majority against what she saw as Britain’s ‘enslavement’ by Brussels. 
She may have thought homosexuality is a sin, but she didn’t want to impose her view on anyone. 
‘I do not care tuppence what consenting adults do. 
It’s not my business’, she said in 2013 . 
(Naturally, you can find that perfectly reasonable quote in her Hope Not Hate profile.) 
She was also the kind of loveable eccentric we used to produce, before we got so bland and uptight about everything. 
Her post-parliamentary stardom saw her take Strictly , Big Brother and panto by storm, becoming one of the vanishingly few right-wing Tories to take on an almost cuddly, national-treasure status. 
She was that very English of things  a deadly serious person who didn’t take herself too seriously; a reminder that even those we disagree with profoundly, whose lives are wildly different to our own, can still be great company. 
This is why the public’s horror at Ann Widdecombe’s death  particularly now it is being treated as a suspected murder  has been followed by disdain for those whose first instinct was to deride her. 
The thought of her final moments, spent in terror, has rattled the nation; the sulphurous inhumanity that greeted her death remains confined to a bigoted fringe. 
Wherever she is now, I’m sure she is taking some comfort in that. 
Tom Slater is editor of spiked . 
Follow him on X: @Tom_Slater_ . 
You’ve hit your monthly free article limit. 
Support spiked and get unlimited access. 
Already a supporter? 
Log in now: 
Monthly support makes the biggest difference. 
Thank you. 
RIP Ann Widdecombe  and shame on her haters 
Count Binface is not funny 
The ‘anti-racist’ rot at the heart of Britain’s police 
Andy Burnham’s shameful pandering to anti-Israel bigots 
The Ann Widdecombe murder investigation has shocked Britain 
‘Without a border, we’re not a country’ 
Brexit: a revolution betrayed? 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.3%Tom Slater: 4.1%spiked: 8.9%Confirmation Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Tom Slater: 0.4%spiked: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.8%Tom Slater: 2.4%spiked: 4.0%Availability Heuristic13.8%This article: 4.6%Tom Slater: 0.7%spiked: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic4.6%This article: 3.0%Tom Slater: 0.1%spiked: 1.0%Hindsight Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Slater: 1.1%spiked: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Tom Slater: 5.0%spiked: 8.4%Framing Effect1.1%This article: 4.1%Tom Slater: 0.2%spiked: 0.3%Loss Aversion4.1%This article: 4.6%Tom Slater: 0.2%spiked: 0.5%Status Quo Bias4.6%This article: 0.5%Tom Slater: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.5%This article: 6.8%Tom Slater: 0.1%spiked: 0.9%Optimism Bias6.8%This article: 5.3%Tom Slater: 2.6%spiked: 2.6%Pessimism Bias5.3%This article: 45.9%Tom Slater: 7.4%spiked: 13.1%Negativity Bias45.9%This article: 2.4%Tom Slater: 0.0%spiked: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias2.4%This article: 1.1%Tom Slater: 1.2%spiked: 2.4%Fundamental Attribution Error1.1%This article: 0.0%Tom Slater: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 8.2%Tom Slater: 3.3%spiked: 3.7%In-Group Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Tom Slater: 8.6%spiked: 4.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 15.9%Tom Slater: 7.5%spiked: 1.8%Halo Effect15.9%This article: 0.0%Tom Slater: 1.2%spiked: 1.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Slater: 0.3%spiked: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.5%Tom Slater: 0.3%spiked: 1.1%Recency Bias7.5%This article: 3.3%Tom Slater: 0.1%spiked: 0.6%Primacy Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Tom Slater: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Tom Slater: 18.6%spiked: 7.3%Ad Hominem6.3%This article: 2.0%Tom Slater: 9.0%spiked: 5.0%Straw Man2.0%This article: 4.8%Tom Slater: 3.2%spiked: 2.6%Appeal to Authority4.8%This article: 2.2%Tom Slater: 2.4%spiked: 4.0%False Dilemma2.2%This article: 3.4%Tom Slater: 0.7%spiked: 3.1%Slippery Slope3.4%This article: 0.0%Tom Slater: 0.2%spiked: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 32.0%Tom Slater: 12.8%spiked: 15.0%Hasty Generalization32.0%This article: 2.4%Tom Slater: 0.0%spiked: 0.6%Red Herring2.4%This article: 0.0%Tom Slater: 0.8%spiked: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 26.2%Tom Slater: 6.7%spiked: 8.0%Appeal to Emotion26.2%This article: 0.4%Tom Slater: 3.3%spiked: 2.1%Begging the Question0.4%This article: 3.2%Tom Slater: 0.9%spiked: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.2%This article: 3.2%Tom Slater: 1.4%spiked: 0.6%Tu Quoque3.2%This article: 0.0%Tom Slater: 1.6%spiked: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Slater: 0.0%spiked: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 7.2%Tom Slater: 0.0%spiked: 0.7%Composition/Division7.2%This article: 5.1%Tom Slater: 2.2%spiked: 4.0%Anecdotal5.1%This article: 3.0%Tom Slater: 1.5%spiked: 0.3%No True Scotsman3.0%This article: 3.5%Tom Slater: 0.7%spiked: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.5%This article: 0.0%Tom Slater: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Slater: 0.0%spiked: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Slater: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Slater: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tom Slater: 1.0%spiked: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.0%Tom Slater: 2.7%spiked: 2.5%Unattributed Quote8.0%This article: 3.3%Tom Slater: 1.5%spiked: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection3.3%This article: 72.2%Tom Slater: 30.0%spiked: 25.8%Biased Writer Voice72.2%This article: 2.9%Tom Slater: 0.7%spiked: 3.2%Indoctrination2.9%This article: 2.4%Tom Slater: 0.9%spiked: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias2.4%This article: 18.2%Tom Slater: 19.0%spiked: 9.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias18.2%This article: 4.6%Tom Slater: 3.0%spiked: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.6%

1118 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers5.7%attributed speech1,054writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageSocialist Worker • 15 words • 100.0% coveragePeter Tatchell • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 100.0% coverageAdam Boulton • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWiddecombe • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Peter Tatchell

100%flagged-word coverage
30 attributed words47% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+95.8 ptsWriter: 4.2%Peter Tatchell: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-76.6 ptsWriter: 76.6%Peter Tatchell: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -19.4 ptsWriter: 19.4%Peter Tatchell: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.8 ptsWriter: 4.8%Peter Tatchell: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.0 ptsWriter: 3.0%Peter Tatchell: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-2.6 ptsWriter: 2.6%Peter Tatchell: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.1 ptsWriter: 2.1%Peter Tatchell: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.