U.S. military strikes Iran in response to attack on civilian vessel in Strait of Hormuz that Tehran said was using an ‘unauthorized route’ 54%

By Jon Gambrell53% Michelle L. Price47% Will Weissert52% The Associated Press65%

7/11/2026, 11:49:54 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.3% saturation with 310 hits. Analysis detected 1,556 faulty-reasoning hits from 789 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.8% and a BS Rank of 54% (9,438 of 20,453 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 53.90% of the article peer group.

Iran said it considers the Strait of Hormuz closed once again after a vessel using an ‘unauthorized route’ was struck by a warning shot in the critical waterway, further jeopardizing the already tenuous ceasefire agreement with the United States. 
U.S. 
Central Command said a short time later that its forces began a third round of strikes against Iran. 
“The United States is imposing a heavy cost by continuing to degrade Iran’s ability to attack civilian mariners and commercial ships freely transiting the strait,” the military said. 
A Cyprus-flagged container ship struck by Iran suffered “significant engineroom damage” and a civilian crew member is missing, U.S. 
Central Command said. 
Senior U.S. officials had previously said in Washington that negotiations to further cement last month’s deal to end the war will be unable to progress without the strait being secure  and had even said they expected Iran to offer public statements to that effect. 
Instead, the Revolutionary Guards Corps stated in an online post on Saturday that Iran launched warning shots at a “violating ship.” 
Iran further reported that the strait would now remain closed until further notice. 
Those announcements followed Iran and Oman’s foreign ministers meeting on Saturday to discuss the strait that lies between them, after days of Iranian attacks on ships and U.S. retaliation that dealt a blow to the interim deal to end the war. 
Iran’s new supreme leader, still unseen since the war began, also vowed in his first statement since the funeral of his father, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that Iranians would avenge his killing in the war’s opening strikes on Feb. 
28. 
Such revenge “is the will of our nation and must certainly be carried out,” Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei said in a statement carried on state television, hours after President Donald Trump threatened more missile attacks. 
Oman said it and Iran agreed to keep talking about the Strait of Hormuz “at the technical and political levels,” a day after the United States called on Iran to publicly say the crucial waterway is open and ships won’t be attacked. 
Iran accuses Washington of violating ceasefire deal 
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said he met with his counterpart in Oman to discuss “appropriate mechanisms for ensuring the safe passage of ships.” 
The world for decades has considered the strait an international waterway. 
Iran has insisted that the strait now remain under its control and that it be allowed to charge ships moving through it, a stance it took after the war began. 
The U.S. urges mariners to transit on a southern route through Oman’s territorial waters. 
About a fifth of all traded oil and natural gas passed through the strait before the war began. 
Iran’s grip on it during the war led to a global energy crisis, though oil prices have sharply dropped since wartime highs of $120 a barrel. 
Iran’s top diplomat also accused the U.S. of violating the interim deal by ending waivers allowing Iran to sell crude oil on the open market in U.S. dollars. 
Washington ended them in response to the attacks on ships in the strait. 
“Reality check: There can only be mutual compliance,” Araghchi wrote on X. 
Trump says he responded to threats to kill him 
A thousand “missiles are Locked and Loaded and aimed at the Islamic Republic of Iran, with thousands more to immediately follow, should the Iranian Government act on its threat,” Trump wrote on social media overnight 
He said he was responding to threats “to assassinate , or attempt to assassinate” him. 
During Khamenei’s funeral, mourners held posters or banners calling for Trump to be killed along with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 
Trump has declared the ceasefire over but said the U.S. would continue negotiations. 
U.S. officials, speaking Friday on condition of anonymity about the current situation with Iran , said the resumption of strikes in recent days came after what they described as a rogue faction of Iranian hard-liners tried to sabotage the ceasefire. 
Iran has insisted its theocracy is unified under the new supreme leader. 
After the U.S. wrapped up its latest strikes on Thursday, more attacks reportedly hit Iran, raising questions about who else may be targeting the Islamic Republic. 
Israel didn’t claim them, meaning the Gulf Arab states may have launched them, likely as a means to deter Iran from attacking them again. 
Iran on Thursday retaliated for U.S. strikes by targeting Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait and Qatar. 
The strikes in Iran over two days killed at least 17 people and wounded 115 others, Iranian Health Ministry spokesperson Hossein Kermanpour said. 
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.3%Jon Gambrell: 2.0%Fortune: 4.2%Confirmation Bias12.3%This article: 2.3%Jon Gambrell: 0.7%Fortune: 1.4%Anchoring Bias2.3%This article: 1.4%Jon Gambrell: 2.7%Fortune: 3.2%Availability Heuristic1.4%This article: 3.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.7%Fortune: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic3.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.4%Fortune: 1.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 2.3%Fortune: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.3%Jon Gambrell: 10.2%Fortune: 6.8%Framing Effect14.3%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.4%Fortune: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.4%Fortune: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%Fortune: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 2.1%Fortune: 3.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 12.5%Jon Gambrell: 2.7%Fortune: 2.5%Pessimism Bias12.5%This article: 39.3%Jon Gambrell: 11.1%Fortune: 7.0%Negativity Bias39.3%This article: 7.4%Jon Gambrell: 1.6%Fortune: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias7.4%This article: 5.1%Jon Gambrell: 0.9%Fortune: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error5.1%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.2%Fortune: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Jon Gambrell: 1.1%Fortune: 0.8%In-Group Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.8%Fortune: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.5%Fortune: 3.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%Fortune: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%Fortune: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.3%Jon Gambrell: 1.6%Fortune: 1.5%Recency Bias3.3%This article: 5.7%Jon Gambrell: 0.2%Fortune: 0.3%Primacy Effect5.7%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%Fortune: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.5%Fortune: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%Fortune: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.8%Jon Gambrell: 3.6%Fortune: 4.9%Appeal to Authority5.8%This article: 1.5%Jon Gambrell: 1.4%Fortune: 2.1%False Dilemma1.5%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 1.2%Fortune: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%Fortune: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.8%Jon Gambrell: 2.3%Fortune: 6.0%Hasty Generalization13.8%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%Fortune: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.3%Fortune: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.1%Jon Gambrell: 5.0%Fortune: 3.0%Appeal to Emotion15.1%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.7%Fortune: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 15.2%Jon Gambrell: 3.5%Fortune: 3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)15.2%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%Fortune: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.3%Fortune: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.2%Fortune: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%Fortune: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.6%Fortune: 2.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 3.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%Fortune: 0.2%No True Scotsman3.0%This article: 10.5%Jon Gambrell: 2.1%Fortune: 2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.5%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%Fortune: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%Fortune: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%Fortune: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 1.5%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%Fortune: 0.1%Special Pleading1.5%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%Fortune: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.2%Jon Gambrell: 3.0%Fortune: 1.5%Unattributed Quote4.2%This article: 8.0%Jon Gambrell: 1.7%Fortune: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection8.0%This article: 5.1%Jon Gambrell: 2.7%Fortune: 4.5%Biased Writer Voice5.1%This article: 4.4%Jon Gambrell: 0.5%Fortune: 1.2%Indoctrination4.4%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.0%Fortune: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%Fortune: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Jon Gambrell: 0.1%Fortune: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.9%

789 words analyzed.

Speakers

10speakers38%attributed speech493writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 18 words • 0.0% coveragethe military • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageRevolutionary Guards Corps • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSupreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei • 35 words • 0.0% coverageOman • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageAbbas Araghchi • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWashington • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAbbas Araghchi • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 35 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageHossein Kermanpour • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

the military

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words9.5% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%the military: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%the military: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.4 ptsWriter: 1.4%the military: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.