9to5Mac58%

WSJ: Apple avoided semiconductor tariffs last year thanks to Intel chip deal - 9to5Mac 73%

By Zac Hall39%

7/11/2026, 6:03:08 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 133 hits. Analysis detected 714 faulty-reasoning hits from 416 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (6,068 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the article peer group.

WSJ: Apple avoided semiconductor tariffs last year thanks to Intel chip deal 
Zac Hall | Jul 10 2026 - 11:03 pm PT 
Intel in the U.S. is expected to make at least some upcoming Mac and iPhone chips for Apple. 
That recent development may have been the key to a major tariff exemption on semiconductors Apple received almost a year ago. 
Robbie Whelan, reporting for The Wall Street Journal on Friday ( Apple News link ): 
Tim Cook was under pressure from the White House last summer when he fielded an unusual request. 
The Apple chief was in Washington, scrambling to persuade the Trump administration to abandon its plan to impose tariffs of 100% on all semiconductor imports, a move that would likely increase the cost of its most important products. 
Apple eventually won an exemption after committing to invest hundreds of billions of dollars more in the U.S. 
In the course of their meetings with Cook, President Trump and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick also brought up another American company: the troubled chip maker Intel. 
The report goes on to detail how the Trump administration essentially offered up an Intel investment as the key to tariff exemptions . 
Nearly a year later, Trump announced via Truth Social post that Apple would begin using Intel-made chips for some of its products, sending Intel shares to record trading highs. 
“I decided to help Intel because we need to design and build our Chips right here in America,” Trump wrote. 
Apple plans to have Intel make chips for both Mac laptops and iPhones, according to a person familiar with the negotiations. 
The connection between the tariff talks and a potential deal between Apple and Intel has not been previously reported. 
Ultimately, Apple was never forced to raise prices on products due to import tariffs on semiconductors. 
Unfortunately, the bill still came due anyway due to the global memory supply shortage. 
Do more with your Apple products 
Apple AirTag 2 | Add Find My tracking to keys, bags, bikes, more 
AirPods 4 | Apple’s newest wireless headphones 
AirPods Pro 3 | Apple’s best wireless headphones 
Beats USB-A to USB-C Cable | The official CarPlay cable 
Wireless CarPlay Adapter | No more plugging in required 
Withings Body Comp | Best smart scale for Apple Health 
Check out 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple news: 
Zac covers Apple news, hosts the 9to5Mac Happy Hour podcast, and created SpaceExplored.com. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 1.5%9to5Mac: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.7%9to5Mac: 2.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.9%Zac Hall: 1.4%9to5Mac: 2.8%Availability Heuristic13.9%This article: 6.3%Zac Hall: 0.9%9to5Mac: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic6.3%This article: 5.0%Zac Hall: 0.3%9to5Mac: 0.3%Hindsight Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 3.2%9to5Mac: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%Zac Hall: 3.9%9to5Mac: 5.3%Framing Effect8.4%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 1.4%9to5Mac: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 1.2%9to5Mac: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%Zac Hall: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect4.3%This article: 3.8%Zac Hall: 3.1%9to5Mac: 3.4%Optimism Bias3.8%This article: 3.4%Zac Hall: 2.9%9to5Mac: 1.9%Pessimism Bias3.4%This article: 13.2%Zac Hall: 3.5%9to5Mac: 4.6%Negativity Bias13.2%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.3%9to5Mac: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Zac Hall: 5.0%9to5Mac: 3.5%Halo Effect7.5%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.0%Zac Hall: 2.0%9to5Mac: 1.8%Recency Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.3%9to5Mac: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.0%Zac Hall: 3.9%9to5Mac: 3.6%Appeal to Authority5.0%This article: 3.4%Zac Hall: 0.7%9to5Mac: 1.4%False Dilemma3.4%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.3%9to5Mac: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.3%9to5Mac: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 1.8%9to5Mac: 4.8%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.1%Zac Hall: 1.8%9to5Mac: 2.2%Appeal to Emotion9.1%This article: 10.3%Zac Hall: 0.3%9to5Mac: 0.6%Begging the Question10.3%This article: 32.0%Zac Hall: 2.0%9to5Mac: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)32.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 4.8%Zac Hall: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.0%Appeal to Nature4.8%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.1%9to5Mac: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.0%Zac Hall: 1.4%9to5Mac: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.8%Zac Hall: 2.7%9to5Mac: 2.4%Unattributed Quote4.8%This article: 7.0%Zac Hall: 0.7%9to5Mac: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection7.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 4.0%9to5Mac: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 1.1%9to5Mac: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zac Hall: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 17.3%Zac Hall: 15.8%9to5Mac: 15.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…17.3%

416 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers18%attributed speech342writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageZac Hall • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageRobbie Whelan • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 29 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
49 attributed words66% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%30.0%60.0%Quote-first Misdirection+59.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 59.2%59.2%Unattributed Quote+40.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 40.8%40.8%Attempt to Sell a Product -21.1 ptsWriter: 21.1%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.