Keystone pipeline owner agrees to $70 million settlement for 2022 Kansas oil spill 4%

By Calen Moore26%

7/10/2026, 7:02:25 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 424 faulty-reasoning hits from 540 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 16.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (21,199 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the article peer group.

Environment & Agriculture 
Keystone pipeline owner agrees to $70 million settlement for 2022 Kansas oil spill 
High Plains Public Radio | 
Published July 10, 2026 at 2:02 PM CDT 
Environmental Protection Agency 
Crews work on oil recovery at Mill Creek in northern Kansas on Dec. 
28, 2022. 
The large oil spill in northern Kansas totaled more than 500,000 gallons that affected prairie, cropland and a creek. 
The settlement includes fines and promises of additional projects to prevent further environmental damage. 
Three years after one of the largest inland oil spills, the state of Kansas, federal government and the company that operates the pipeline have agreed to a settlement totalling $70 million. 
The U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. 
Department of Justice, and the state of Kansas reached a settlement agreement with the company South Bow responsible for the Keystone pipeline, which ruptured in 2022 in northern Kansas. 
In a press release from the EPA, the agency said South Bow violated the Clean Water Act. 
“This case demonstrates why the oil pipelines crossing our heartland must be maintained properly. 
The oil spill blanketed land and water, rendering the waterway lifeless and useless and requiring extensive cleanup and remediation,” Jeffrey A. 
Hall, Assistant Administrator for EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, said in the release. 
In December 2022, the pipeline that runs from Canada to Texas broke near Washington, Kansas, causing 543,000 gallons of oil to leak . 
South Bow has agreed to pay a civil penalty of almost $27 million and complete projects to prevent further damage, which South Bow estimates will cost approximately $40 million. 
South Bow has also agreed to contribute over $3 million to the state of Kansas towards natural resource restoration projects. 
At the time of the spill, Canadian oil company TC Energy owned the pipeline. 
The company spun off that part of the business into South Bow in 2024. 
South Bow had said that faulty welding caused an “instantaneous rupture” spilling out tar-like crude oil affecting Kansas native prairie, cropland and Mill Creek. 
The Department of Justice said in a press release that this “created an imminent and substantial threat to human health and the environment.” 
According to the EPA’s legal complaint, oil residue was found in the 35 acres surrounding the discharge. 
The spill killed or impacted more than 2,700 animals. 
“It is important that we are all good stewards of the environment,” U.S. 
Attorney Ryan A. 
Kriegshauser for the District of Kansas said in the release. 
“The incident had a massive impact on the State of Kansas, and we are happy that this settlement will mitigate that damage.” 
Calen Moore covers western Kansas for High Plains Public Radio and the Kansas News Service. 
You can email him at cmoore@hppr.org . 
The Kansas News Service is a collaboration of KCUR, Kansas Public Radio, KMUW and High Plains Public Radio. 
Kansas News Service stories and photos may be republished by news media at no cost with proper attribution and a link to ksnewsservice.org . 
Calen Moore is the western Kansas reporter for High Plains Public Radio and the Kansas News Service. 
You can reach him at cmoore@hppr.org. 
See stories by Calen Moore 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 1.6%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 1.4%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Calen Moore: 6.1%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect6.3%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 1.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.4%Calen Moore: 7.4%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 1.7%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%Calen Moore: 4.5%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias9.8%This article: 8.5%Calen Moore: 2.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 1.7%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.9%Calen Moore: 1.9%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority10.9%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.1%Calen Moore: 2.6%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization4.1%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.8%Calen Moore: 3.1%Columbia Missourian: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion9.8%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 2.4%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 4.4%Calen Moore: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature4.4%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 1.9%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 5.0%Calen Moore: 0.9%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection5.0%This article: 4.1%Calen Moore: 2.4%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice4.1%This article: 2.4%Calen Moore: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Indoctrination2.4%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Calen Moore: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Calen Moore: 1.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.8%

540 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers44%attributed speech304writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageHigh Plains Public Radio • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageEnvironmental Protection Agency • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageEnvironmental Protection Agency • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJeffrey A. Hall • 14 words • 100.0% coverageJeffrey A. Hall • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJeffrey A. Hall • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageSouth Bow • 29 words • 0.0% coverageSouth Bow • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSouth Bow • 24 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageEnvironmental Protection Agency • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageRyan A. Kriegshauser • 13 words • 100.0% coverageRyan A. Kriegshauser • 3 words • 0.0% coverageRyan A. Kriegshauser • 10 words • 0.0% coverageRyan A. Kriegshauser • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ryan A. Kriegshauser

94%flagged-word coverage
48 attributed words20% of attributed speech21% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice+45.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ryan A. Kriegshauser: 45.8%45.8%Quote-first Misdirection+27.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ryan A. Kriegshauser: 27.1%27.1%Indoctrination+27.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ryan A. Kriegshauser: 27.1%27.1%Attempt to Sell a Product -13.8 ptsWriter: 13.8%Ryan A. Kriegshauser: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.