Bluesky's interim CEO 51%

By Lucas Ropek25%

7/10/2026, 9:51:55 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 829 faulty-reasoning hits from 534 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (10,185 of 20,515 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the article peer group.

In March, Bluesky’s longtime CEO, Jay Graber, stepped down from that role to become its chief innovation officer. 
Graber was immediately succeeded by Toni Schneider, the founding CEO of Automattic, which is the company behind WordPress and Tumblr. 
Schneider, who has led the company as interim CEO for the past four months, is now dropping the “interim” status and becoming its permanent chief executive. 
“I’m four months into my interim CEO role at Bluesky, and it’s time for an update,” Schneider wrote on his personal blog . 
“Most importantly, as of today, the interim part of the title is gone. 
I’m loving the mission and the job, and I’m all in as Bluesky’s official CEO.” 
In the post, Schneider said that one of his first orders of business is to “create smaller spaces and more private communities,” which he said would “unlock the next wave of growth and innovation.” 
Automattic and True Ventures, which is a venture capital firm where Schneider is a partner, are both investors in Bluesky. 
Bluesky, which was originally spun off from Twitter, became a haven for those who wished to avoid the changes Elon Musk brought to the platform after he took it over in 2022 (the site was eventually renamed X and now it is a subsidiary of Musk’s combination rocket and AI company, SpaceXAI). 
Under Graber, the site grew to 43 million users , while the site’s underlying technology, the AT Protocol  a system that lets Bluesky and other apps share the same social network  was significantly expanded. 
Lately, though, the site has struggled to retain or grow its user base. 
Some have questioned whether it is dying  pointing to apparent declines in both engagement and its overall community of users. 
Bluesky saw a sharp rise in users in the wake of Donald Trump’s re-election (when Elon Musk was most active in politics), but the site appears to have seen a drop-off since then. 
In short: Schneider will have his work cut out for him. 
He seems game for it, though. 
“We’re at the very beginning of this story,” he wrote Friday. 
Bluesky , Elon Musk , Social , social media , toni schneider , Twitter , X 
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission . 
This doesn’t affect our editorial independence. 
Senior Writer, TechCrunch 
Lucas is a senior writer at TechCrunch, where he covers artificial intelligence, consumer tech, and startups. 
He previously covered AI and cybersecurity at Gizmodo. 
You can contact Lucas by emailing lucas.ropek@techcrunch.com. 
Last chance to save up to $190 on TechCrunch Founder Summit. 
Join 1,000+ founders and VCs at all stages for real-world scaling insights and connections that move the needle. 
Savings end June 26, 11:59 p.m. 
PT . 
Elon Musk praises Mythos/Fable, promises not to ‘cut off’ Anthropic 
Instagram users: Here’s how to stop Meta’s AI from using your photos 
Figma acquires team behind a vibe-coding app 
If you use Google, you’re training its AI. 
Here’s how to opt out. 
Reddit is using LLMs to solve a problem LLMs largely created 
Amazon will stop accepting new customers for Mechanical Turk 
5 desk gadgets that can make your workday better 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 1.9%TechCrunch: 3.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.8%TechCrunch: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.1%Lucas Ropek: 3.2%TechCrunch: 3.4%Availability Heuristic10.1%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 1.4%TechCrunch: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.5%TechCrunch: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 2.0%TechCrunch: 2.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.6%Lucas Ropek: 4.9%TechCrunch: 4.6%Framing Effect0.6%This article: 3.2%Lucas Ropek: 0.3%TechCrunch: 0.6%Loss Aversion3.2%This article: 4.9%Lucas Ropek: 0.4%TechCrunch: 0.6%Status Quo Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.4%TechCrunch: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 19.9%Lucas Ropek: 3.5%TechCrunch: 5.0%Optimism Bias19.9%This article: 2.1%Lucas Ropek: 1.0%TechCrunch: 1.2%Pessimism Bias2.1%This article: 21.5%Lucas Ropek: 5.5%TechCrunch: 5.0%Negativity Bias21.5%This article: 3.9%Lucas Ropek: 0.7%TechCrunch: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias3.9%This article: 1.1%Lucas Ropek: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error1.1%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.5%TechCrunch: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Lucas Ropek: 1.4%TechCrunch: 3.3%Halo Effect3.7%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 12.9%Lucas Ropek: 1.7%TechCrunch: 2.3%Recency Bias12.9%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.2%TechCrunch: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.7%Lucas Ropek: 2.5%TechCrunch: 4.3%Appeal to Authority6.7%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.9%TechCrunch: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.4%TechCrunch: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.4%Lucas Ropek: 5.1%TechCrunch: 6.0%Hasty Generalization5.4%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.2%TechCrunch: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.4%Lucas Ropek: 1.2%TechCrunch: 1.2%Bandwagon3.4%This article: 6.2%Lucas Ropek: 2.8%TechCrunch: 2.2%Appeal to Emotion6.2%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.3%TechCrunch: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 18.0%Lucas Ropek: 3.1%TechCrunch: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)18.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.1%Lucas Ropek: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.5%Burden of Proof1.1%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.2%TechCrunch: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 1.9%TechCrunch: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.5%Lucas Ropek: 2.8%TechCrunch: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.5%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.2%Lucas Ropek: 3.1%TechCrunch: 1.9%Unattributed Quote8.2%This article: 8.8%Lucas Ropek: 0.9%TechCrunch: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection8.8%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 4.2%TechCrunch: 4.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.2%TechCrunch: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.1%TechCrunch: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lucas Ropek: 0.0%TechCrunch: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.0%Lucas Ropek: 4.2%TechCrunch: 4.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…12.0%

534 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers24%attributed speech406writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageToni Schneider • 23 words • 100.0% coverageToni Schneider • 13 words • 100.0% coverageToni Schneider • 15 words • 0.0% coverageToni Schneider • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 52 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageToni Schneider • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageTechCrunch • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageTechCrunch • 11 words • 100.0% coverageTechCrunch • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

TechCrunch

91%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words25% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%47.5%95.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +82.0 ptsWriter: 8.6%TechCrunch: 90.6%90.6%Unattributed Quote-5.2 ptsWriter: 5.2%TechCrunch: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.