8-year-old girl killed by lightning just feet from family 38%

By Patrick Reilly35%

7/9/2026, 5:59:15 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.8% saturation with 164 hits. Analysis detected 743 faulty-reasoning hits from 458 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.8% and a BS Rank of 38% (13,715 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 62.70% of the article peer group.

See more of our coverage in your search results. 
Add The New York Post on Google 
An 8-year-old girl was killed by a lightning strike while playing in a backyard just feet away from her devastated family members. 
Little Kinslee Tschida’s nurse mother desperately tried to give her daughter CPR after the fatal strike in rural Illinois on Friday, July 3  but the girl later died at the hospital from her injuries, according to Kinslee’s grieving grandfather. 
Kinslee was playing on a swing outside with her cousins on Friday when her uncle heard a “rumble” of thunder and told them to get off the swing and come inside the house, only about 20 feet away. 
“Kinslee was just climbing off, and all of a sudden, in an instant  I mean, there was no warning  It came right in between the tree,” Chris Scheib, who helped raise the girl, told WGN-TV in an emotional interview. 
Kinslee Tschida was fatally struck by lightning on Friday, July 3. 
Chris Scheib 
“In 5 or 10 seconds, she would have been fine,” Scheib told WLS . 
Scheib said his other granddaughter was less than four feet away from Kinslee but escaped unscathed, along with other family members who witnessed the lightning strike. 
“They did try CPR. 
My son and my daughter  on her own daughter  and being a nurse, you know she took that real hard. 
She can’t save her own daughter,” Scheib said. 
“Basically, there’s nothing else you could have done.” 
Chris Scheib broke down in tears talking about his granddaughter’s sudden death. 
WLS 
Kinslee was taken from the home in Serena to OSF St. 
Elizabeth Hospital in Ottawa, where she was pronounced dead. 
The La Salle County Coroner’s Office told The Post that an autopsy was conducted on Sunday. 
The official cause of death will be determined in about four to five weeks, the coroner said. 
“It’s unfathomable, it’s unrealistic, it’s hard to grasp,” Schieb said. 
Kinslee would have been entering the third grade at Rutland Grade School this fall. 
Her family says she loved to sing, dance and bring joy to those around her, WGN-TV reported. 
The girl was struck in a backyard in rural Illinois. 
WLS 
A GoFundMe was started to help Kinslee’s family cover burial and medical expenses. 
“You try to muddle through it, I guess. 
I never had to deal with this in my life until now, and it’s changed me. 
I think we’re all broken,” Scheib said. 
Kinslee’s death is the fourth lightning fatality in the US so far this year, according to the National Lightning Safety Council . 
Chris Scheib broke down in tears talking about his granddaughter's sudden death. 
WLS 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 3.2%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 1.0%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Patrick Reilly: 3.9%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic10.5%This article: 5.7%Patrick Reilly: 0.8%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic5.7%This article: 3.1%Patrick Reilly: 0.8%California Post: 0.8%Hindsight Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 1.1%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Patrick Reilly: 10.2%California Post: 10.3%Framing Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.5%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.4%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.3%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Patrick Reilly: 1.0%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias2.2%This article: 35.8%Patrick Reilly: 22.7%California Post: 16.0%Negativity Bias35.8%This article: 3.5%Patrick Reilly: 0.2%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias3.5%This article: 8.7%Patrick Reilly: 0.9%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error8.7%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.1%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.5%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Patrick Reilly: 2.4%California Post: 3.1%Halo Effect3.7%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.9%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.6%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.5%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.3%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.0%Patrick Reilly: 5.5%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority12.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.5%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.5%Patrick Reilly: 3.0%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization1.5%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.4%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 19.7%Patrick Reilly: 12.2%California Post: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion19.7%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 1.1%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 1.4%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.7%Patrick Reilly: 0.6%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof1.7%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.1%Patrick Reilly: 2.6%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal3.1%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 2.0%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.3%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.8%Patrick Reilly: 2.0%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote11.8%This article: 9.0%Patrick Reilly: 2.4%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection9.0%This article: 22.1%Patrick Reilly: 12.1%California Post: 13.1%Biased Writer Voice22.1%This article: 2.8%Patrick Reilly: 0.7%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination2.8%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.1%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.3%California Post: 3.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Patrick Reilly: 0.6%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.5%

458 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers40%attributed speech275writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageChris Scheib • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageChris Scheib • 2 words • 0.0% coverageChris Scheib • 14 words • 0.0% coverageChris Scheib • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageChris Scheib • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWLS • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageLa Salle County Coroner’s Office • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLa Salle County Coroner’s Office • 17 words • 0.0% coverageChris Scheib • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWGN-TV • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWLS • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageChris Scheib • 7 words • 0.0% coverageNational Lightning Safety Council • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWLS • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Chris Scheib

98%flagged-word coverage
108 attributed words59% of attributed speech65% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Quote-first Misdirection+38.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Chris Scheib: 38.0%38.0%Biased Writer Voice-30.5 ptsWriter: 30.5%Chris Scheib: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-19.6 ptsWriter: 19.6%Chris Scheib: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.8 ptsWriter: 5.8%Chris Scheib: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-4.7 ptsWriter: 4.7%Chris Scheib: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.