9to5Mac58%

Apple supplier Luxshare share listing sets new record then fell back 55%

By Ben Lovejoy70%

7/9/2026, 5:35:21 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 169 hits. Analysis detected 881 faulty-reasoning hits from 479 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (9,947 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the article peer group.

Apple supplier Luxshare share listing sets new record then fell back 
Ben Lovejoy | Jul 9 2026 - 5:35 am PT 
Luxshare is one of the ultimate rags-to-riches stories, founded by a woman who started out as a Foxconn assembly-line worker and growing into a multi-billion dollar company and key Apple supplier. 
It’s been a publicly traded company in China since 2010, but has now added a second listing in Hong Kong, making it more accessible to overseas investors. 
Its latest listing set a new record before sliding back  
Founded by Wang Laichun, Luxshare rose from a cable maker to assembling first AirPods, then iPhones, and most recently Vision Pro models. 
Shares in Chinese companies are tightly controlled, with foreign investors facing trading quotas and  in some cases  a need for regulatory approval. 
For that reason, it’s not unusual for Chinese companies to create a dual listing in Hong Kong. 
Although control over the island was handed back to China from Britain, it still operates without capital controls or quotas for foreign investment. 
LuxShare was optimistic in its pricing, opting for HK$63.28 per share, at the very top of the range. 
That saw the company set a new record as the city’s biggest listing of the year, raising around HK$24.3B (US$3.1B). 
However, as TNW reports, the value of the shares soon slid backwards. 
The stock fell as much as 9.6% below its offer price before clawing back part of the loss, an underwhelming opening for one of the year’s most closely watched share sales […] The shares touched a low of about HK$57.2 against the HK$63.28 offer price and were changing hands near HK$60 through much of the morning. 
Investor concerns include the company’s dependence on Apple, with the iPhone maker accounting for more than two-thirds of its revenue  especially at a time when the Cupertino company is seeking to reduce its dependence on China by moving some of its assembly work to countries like India and Vietnam. 
However, the new investment will help the company fund production capacity in other countries, and Luxshare is also expected to boost the amount of work it carries out for other customers. 
Official Apple Store on Amazon 
Discounted AirPods Pro 3 
Wireless CarPlay adapter 
AirTag holders and accessories 
Mac Pro-style Mac mini casing 
NordVPN  privacy-first VPN with no logs and independent audits to verify 
Photo by Adam Śmigielski on Unsplash 
Check out 9to5Mac on YouTube for more Apple news: 
Ben Lovejoy is a British technology writer and EU Editor for 9to5Mac. 
He’s known for his op-eds and diary pieces, exploring his experience of Apple products over time, for a more rounded review. 
He also writes fiction, with two technothriller novels, a couple of SF shorts and a rom-com! 
Ben Lovejoy's favorite gear 
Dell 49-inch curved monitor 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.8%Ben Lovejoy: 5.4%9to5Mac: 2.7%Confirmation Bias4.8%This article: 3.8%Ben Lovejoy: 1.8%9to5Mac: 2.2%Anchoring Bias3.8%This article: 7.9%Ben Lovejoy: 3.8%9to5Mac: 2.8%Availability Heuristic7.9%This article: 11.1%Ben Lovejoy: 1.9%9to5Mac: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic11.1%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.5%9to5Mac: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 3.7%9to5Mac: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Ben Lovejoy: 5.4%9to5Mac: 5.3%Framing Effect5.4%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 1.2%9to5Mac: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.8%9to5Mac: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 15.9%Ben Lovejoy: 4.0%9to5Mac: 3.4%Optimism Bias15.9%This article: 6.5%Ben Lovejoy: 3.6%9to5Mac: 1.9%Pessimism Bias6.5%This article: 16.5%Ben Lovejoy: 8.5%9to5Mac: 4.6%Negativity Bias16.5%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.6%9to5Mac: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 10.4%Ben Lovejoy: 1.0%9to5Mac: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error10.4%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.6%9to5Mac: 0.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 10.9%Ben Lovejoy: 2.5%9to5Mac: 3.5%Halo Effect10.9%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 21.1%Ben Lovejoy: 2.3%9to5Mac: 1.8%Recency Bias21.1%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.3%9to5Mac: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.0%Ben Lovejoy: 5.5%9to5Mac: 3.6%Appeal to Authority5.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 1.7%9to5Mac: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.8%9to5Mac: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.5%Ben Lovejoy: 8.7%9to5Mac: 4.8%Hasty Generalization3.5%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 2.2%9to5Mac: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 3.1%9to5Mac: 2.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 1.3%9to5Mac: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 2.2%9to5Mac: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 1.0%9to5Mac: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 4.2%9to5Mac: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.1%9to5Mac: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 2.2%9to5Mac: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.2%9to5Mac: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.3%9to5Mac: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 35.3%Ben Lovejoy: 4.5%9to5Mac: 2.4%Unattributed Quote35.3%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.4%9to5Mac: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 15.4%Ben Lovejoy: 6.4%9to5Mac: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice15.4%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 3.7%9to5Mac: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ben Lovejoy: 0.0%9to5Mac: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 10.4%Ben Lovejoy: 10.6%9to5Mac: 15.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…10.4%

479 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers5.8%attributed speech451writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageBen Lovejoy • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 56 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageNordVPN • 12 words • 100.0% coverageAdam Śmigielski • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

NordVPN

100%flagged-word coverage
12 attributed words43% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +91.6 ptsWriter: 8.4%NordVPN: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-37.5 ptsWriter: 37.5%NordVPN: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-16.4 ptsWriter: 16.4%NordVPN: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.