FBI Raided Texas Activist’s House  Then Offered Her $200,000 to Become Antifa Informant 28%

By C. Frances0% A.D. Chilcote0%

7/7/2026, 9:10:21 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 212 hits. Analysis detected 1,898 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,493 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (14,771 of 20,363 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the article peer group.

In the early morning hours of June 29, federal agents from the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security conducted a raid on home in Midlothian, Texas, in the Dallas–Fort Worth metropolitan area. 
The raid, which saw federal agents deploying flash-bang grenades and using armored vehicles, was authorized by a federal search warrant related to an ongoing federal investigation into an alleged bomb plot at a June 14 Ultimate Fighting Championship event at the White House. 
The Justice Department <a href="https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/five-men-arrested-and-charged-plot-attack-and-kill-government-officials-and-others-attending">characterized</a> the case as an assassination plot against high-ranking officials using of explosive drones and sniper rifles. 
The search warrant in Midlothian was issued as part of federal agents’ search for evidence of several potential charges, including conspiracy to commit murder, according to documents viewed by The Intercept. 
“They are stress-testing the limits of NSPM-7.” 
The subject of the raid in Texas claimed that, in the days after the raid, federal agents returned to her home and offered her up to $200,000 to act as an informant for federal law enforcement. 
The resident, “Doberman,” who asked only to be identified only by her social media handle because of ongoing threats to her safety, has not been indicted on any charges. 
Doberman also said she was visited by agents from the FBI and Secret Service weeks before the raid. 
The raid was part of a sweeping effort by the federal government and far-right media figures to spin up a vast far-left conspiracy casting antifascist activists as well-organized extremists who pose a threat to public safety. 
Related 
Trump’s Communist Boogeyman Playbook: Charging Protesters as Terrorists 
President Donald Trump has made attacks on antifascist activists a centerpiece of his <a href="https://theintercept.com/2026/07/03/antifa-prairieland-protests-terrorism-conspiracy/">domestic crackdown on the left</a>, designating antifa a terrorist organization and issuing directives like the National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 to <a href="https://theintercept.com/2026/02/12/pam-bondi-domestic-terror-list-nspm-7/">focus resources</a> on going after left-wing activists. 
The crackdown recently helped spur <a href="https://theintercept.com/2026/06/23/prairieland-texas-ice-protest-prison-sentences/">centuries’ worth of combined prison sentences</a> for a clutch of left-wing activists who launched a protest at U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Prairieland Detention Facility, just a 20-minutes drive from Midlothian. 
First Amendment advocates said the Midlothian raid fit into the widespread pattern of aggressive policing tactics being used against the left, including other <a href="https://theintercept.com/2026/06/20/fbi-ice-delaney-hall-protest-informants/">attempts to flip activists</a>. 
Most Read 
Cops Warn CEO Bodyguards That Luigi Mangione Fever Could Spark Class War 
Glen Stellmacher, Noah Hurowitz 
The Horrifying Lessons of 250 Years of American History 
Nick Turse 
RFK Jr. 
Claims He’s Investigating Terrorism Now, Too 
Jessica Washington 
“They are stress-testing the limits of NSPM-7, both by trying to cast various groups or voluntary associations that are protected by the First Amendment as being antifa, or as falling within the ambit of this sort of very broad definition of terrorism,” said Moira Meltzer-Cohen, a New York-based attorney who represents defendants in federal cases but is not working on the Midlothian raid. 
“We see that with this thing in North Texas, we saw that in Prairieland, and we’re seeing that in Minneapolis”  a reference to the recent <a href="https://theintercept.com/2026/06/17/ice-indictment-minneapolis-protesters/">indictments</a> of <a href="https://theintercept.com/2026/06/17/signal-messages-minneapolis-ice-protests/">15 anti-ICE activists</a> in Minnesota. 
Doberman is a well-known activist in north Texas left-wing circles. 
She has been filmed armed at protests and is a member of a group known as the Community Liberation Brigade. 
In the days before the raid, a Dallas Express op-ed by a local right-wing activist identified Doberman as a leader of the Community Liberation Brigade. 
The article suggested that Doberman had ties to the Pairieland defendants  a case that saw the <a href="https://theintercept.com/2026/03/17/ice-protester-terrorism-convictions-trump-prairieland/">government’s first successful</a> prosecution <a href="https://theintercept.com/2026/03/13/ice-protesters-terrorism-prairieland-antifa/">under Trump’s directives</a> against antifa. 
It’s unclear what role, if any, the Dallas Express op-ed played in the raid. 
Related 
The FBI Paid a Violent Felon to Infiltrate Denver&#8217;s Racial Justice Movement 
Doberman, who told The Intercept she doesn’t have any ties to the Prairieland defendants, said she was questioned about the case during the raid. 
Authorities also asked Doberman about people named in recent federal indictments surrounding the UFC plot, where the most serious charges included conspiracy to commit murder  the same charge that appeared on the search warrant for Doberman’s home. 
Because of the ongoing investigation, the Secret Service directed questions about Doberman’s case to the Justice Department. 
The Department of Homeland Security referred questions to the FBI. 
Neither the Justice Department nor the FBI immediately responded to requests for comment. 
“Rifles Trained Directly at Me” 
Two weeks before the Midlothian raid, federal agents tried to question Doberman about the alleged plot to attack the UFC 250 event, an extravagant mixed martial arts performance hosted by the White House as part of its celebrations of 250 years of American independence. 
Two men who identified themselves as federal agents from the FBI and Secret Service arrived at Doberman’s door, according to video footage of the encounter obtained by The Intercept. 
In the footage, one of the agents assures Doberman that she is “not in trouble” and asks her if she knows anything about an impending attack. 
Doberman replies that she doesn’t know anything about any plot. 
When asked if she plans to travel to Washington, she says she is “broke as fuck.” 
Shortly after, Doberman declined to answer further questions and instructs the agents to come back with a warrant. 
Read our complete coverage 
Chilling Dissent 
Two weeks later  just days after the Dallas Express piece published  federal agents arrived during the early morning hours in <a href="https://theintercept.com/2025/10/30/military-gear-police-trump-1122/">Bearcat</a> armored vehicles. 
They broke down Doberman’s door in a “no-knock” raid, a <a href="https://theintercept.com/2025/10/15/collateral-damage-episode-two-death-dark/">controversial tactic</a> that has led to the deaths of <a href="https://theintercept.com/2020/12/17/no-knock-raid-new-york-breonna-taylor/">innocent people</a>. 
“I was woken up by a loud crack, a loud bang,” Doberman told The Intercept in her first media interview since the raid. 
“I shot up and looked directly to my door, where I was then briefly blinded by a very fucking bright flash of light. 
After I got my vision back, I saw three rifles trained directly at me.” 
Officers placed Doberman in handcuffs, she said, and led her to a local police cruiser parked nearby. 
Doberman, who is transgender, was denied the opportunity to put on clothes, even after being detained and handcuffed by agents. 
She was then forced outside in her underwear. 
“I’m a trans woman  so, trans woman in a very red state, in a very red city, in feminine underwear. 
Not the best look,” she said. 
According to a seizure receipt viewed by the The Intercept, Doberman’s cellphone was the only item taken during the raid. 
In the days after the raid, another FBI agent, whom Doberman said did not give their name, returned her cellphone. 
“We know that you’re struggling financially. 
We know that the people you hold dear are struggling financially.” 
During the exchange, Doberman said, the agent offered her hundreds of thousands of dollars to become a confidential informant.&nbsp; 
“He said, ‘Hey, we know that you’re struggling financially. 
We know that the people you hold dear are struggling financially. 
We are willing to offer monetary gain if you can give us any information on bad actors,’” she recalled. 
“The agent said $100,000 to $200,000, which is a life-changing amount,” Doberman said. 
Doberman said she told the agent that she would think about the offer. 
In an interview with The Intercept, however, she said she had no intention of accepting. 
Join Our Newsletter 
Original reporting. 
Fearless journalism. 
Delivered to you. 
Shortly after the offer was made, Doberman spoke to Xavier de Janon, an attorney with the <a href="https://theintercept.com/2026/07/07/antifa-terrorist-threat-fbi-police-fusion-centers/">National Lawyers Guild</a> who confirmed the account to The Intercept. 
De Janon says that proposals like the one received by Doberman could be indicative of the larger network of resources being poured into federal investigations under Trump’s NSPM-7 directive. 
“Getting money in exchange for information isn’t new for this government. 
It’s actually pretty old. 
I think what is a bit surprising is the amount,” he said. 
“These cash payouts are really large and probably reflect the very large budgets that these federal agencies have under Trump.” 
De Janon said large financial offers to potential collaborators raise questions about the validity of information provided by informants. 
Related 
FBI Counterterrorism Informant Spent a Decade Committing Fraud 
“Even without cash payments, federal informants and state-level informants, too, are pressured so much to give out information that they start behaving in ways that creates criminal situations and questionable moments that wouldn’t have happened to begin with,” he said. 
<a href="https://theintercept.com/2017/01/31/the-fbi-gives-itself-lots-of-rope-to-pull-in-informants/">Informant programs</a> have been <a href="https://theintercept.com/2024/03/06/gretchen-whitmer-kidnapping-informant/">riddled with issues</a> and allegations that the government <a href="https://theintercept.com/2025/09/05/fbi-ice-informant-trump-foad-farahi/">targets</a> and <a href="https://theintercept.com/2023/07/31/fbi-isis-sting-mentally-ill-teen/">takes advantage</a> of <a href="https://theintercept.com/2023/02/07/fbi-denver-racial-justice-protests-informant/">vulnerable people</a>, and alleged criminal plots are frequently <a href="https://theintercept.com/2023/02/07/fbi-denver-racial-justice-protests-informant/">conceived and proposed</a> by the <a href="https://theintercept.com/2018/07/13/standing-rock-red-fawn-fallis-sentencing/">informants</a> themselves. 
For her part, Doberman was rattled by the raid. 
Though she was not accused of any crimes, the violent raid left her in a persistent state of anxiety. 
“I’ve been working on my PTSD for years,” she said. 
“It’s gotten so much worse. 
And every night now, constant nightmares.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.1%C. Frances: 3.0%The Intercept: 5.2%Confirmation Bias13.1%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%C. Frances: 1.9%The Intercept: 3.0%Availability Heuristic4.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.6%The Intercept: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.7%The Intercept: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.3%The Intercept: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%C. Frances: 6.1%The Intercept: 9.3%Framing Effect7.1%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.4%The Intercept: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%C. Frances: 0.6%The Intercept: 2.2%Pessimism Bias5.5%This article: 11.8%C. Frances: 5.3%The Intercept: 12.5%Negativity Bias11.8%This article: 2.6%C. Frances: 3.6%The Intercept: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 1.2%The Intercept: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 1.4%C. Frances: 0.5%The Intercept: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.8%The Intercept: 1.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%C. Frances: 0.8%The Intercept: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.9%This article: 0.8%C. Frances: 2.8%The Intercept: 1.0%Halo Effect0.8%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.1%C. Frances: 0.6%The Intercept: 1.3%Recency Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 2.7%The Intercept: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.5%C. Frances: 1.3%The Intercept: 3.5%Appeal to Authority2.5%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 1.6%The Intercept: 2.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 1.5%C. Frances: 0.4%The Intercept: 1.7%Slippery Slope1.5%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.9%C. Frances: 6.0%The Intercept: 7.2%Hasty Generalization13.9%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.4%C. Frances: 4.2%The Intercept: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion9.4%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.2%The Intercept: 1.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.2%C. Frances: 2.3%The Intercept: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.2%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.4%The Intercept: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.6%C. Frances: 0.4%The Intercept: 0.4%Composition/Division2.6%This article: 11.2%C. Frances: 2.1%The Intercept: 2.3%Anecdotal11.2%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.5%C. Frances: 1.2%The Intercept: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.5%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.6%The Intercept: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 1.3%C. Frances: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy1.3%This article: 4.2%C. Frances: 1.0%The Intercept: 2.1%Unattributed Quote4.2%This article: 0.5%C. Frances: 0.8%The Intercept: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection0.5%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 2.7%The Intercept: 10.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%C. Frances: 0.3%The Intercept: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 14.2%C. Frances: 3.4%The Intercept: 6.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias14.2%This article: 1.7%C. Frances: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias1.7%This article: 0.2%C. Frances: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.2%

1493 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers32%attributed speech1,011writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageMoira Meltzer-Cohen • 63 words • 100.0% coverageMoira Meltzer-Cohen • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageDoberman • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDoberman • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDoberman • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDoberman • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDoberman • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDoberman • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDoberman • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDoberman • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDoberman • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDoberman • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDoberman • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDoberman • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDoberman • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDoberman • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDoberman • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageXavier de Janon • 29 words • 100.0% coverageXavier de Janon • 11 words • 0.0% coverageXavier de Janon • 4 words • 0.0% coverageXavier de Janon • 12 words • 0.0% coverageXavier de Janon • 20 words • 0.0% coverageXavier de Janon • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageXavier de Janon • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDoberman • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDoberman • 5 words • 0.0% coverageDoberman • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Moira Meltzer-Cohen

100%flagged-word coverage
98 attributed words20% of attributed speech61% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Unattributed Quote+64.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Moira Meltzer-Cohen: 64.3%64.3%Politically Left Leaning B-18.1 ptsWriter: 18.1%Moira Meltzer-Cohen: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -2.5 ptsWriter: 2.5%Moira Meltzer-Cohen: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-0.7 ptsWriter: 0.7%Moira Meltzer-Cohen: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -0.3 ptsWriter: 0.3%Moira Meltzer-Cohen: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.