Supreme Court Handed Trump Ruling He Needed To Drain The Swamp ⁠93%

By Mary Rooke⁠0%

7/2/2026, 7:51:32 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 84.9% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 481 faulty-reasoning hits from 86 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 88.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,597 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 92.70% of the article peer group.

The U.S. 
Supreme Court just overturned an almost 100-year precedent, paving the way for President Donald Trump to fulfill a 2016 campaign promise. 
Trump vowed to “drain the swamp” during his first presidential campaign. 
He wanted to end the administrative state that operated with limited accountability. 
It looks like the Supreme Court just handed him the executive authority to dismantle the permanent federal bureaucracy, which, until now, has acted as a fourth branch of government. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 12.8%Mary Rooke: 4.3%The Daily Caller: 5.0%Confirmation Bias12.8%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 1.3%The Daily Caller: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 4.5%The Daily Caller: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 2.8%The Daily Caller: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 24.4%Mary Rooke: 1.1%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Hindsight Bias24.4%This article: 33.7%Mary Rooke: 2.4%The Daily Caller: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias33.7%This article: 84.9%Mary Rooke: 20.2%The Daily Caller: 10.4%Framing Effect84.9%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 33.7%Mary Rooke: 0.7%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Status Quo Bias33.7%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 2.1%The Daily Caller: 2.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 2.4%The Daily Caller: 2.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 60.5%Mary Rooke: 18.0%The Daily Caller: 8.2%Negativity Bias60.5%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.9%The Daily Caller: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.5%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 2.8%The Daily Caller: 1.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.7%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.5%The Daily Caller: 1.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.4%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 12.8%Mary Rooke: 0.8%The Daily Caller: 0.6%Primacy Effect12.8%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 1.5%The Daily Caller: 1.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 33.7%Mary Rooke: 5.8%The Daily Caller: 4.6%Appeal to Authority33.7%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 1.0%The Daily Caller: 2.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 33.7%Mary Rooke: 2.3%The Daily Caller: 2.4%Slippery Slope33.7%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 9.7%The Daily Caller: 6.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.4%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 2.4%The Daily Caller: 1.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 9.5%The Daily Caller: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 4.3%The Daily Caller: 2.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 37.2%Mary Rooke: 3.8%The Daily Caller: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)37.2%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.2%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 2.1%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 4.3%The Daily Caller: 1.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.2%The Daily Caller: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 14.0%Mary Rooke: 1.2%The Daily Caller: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)14.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.4%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 0.4%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.8%Mary Rooke: 1.7%The Daily Caller: 2.2%Unattributed Quote12.8%This article: 70.9%Mary Rooke: 2.7%The Daily Caller: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection70.9%This article: 46.5%Mary Rooke: 20.8%The Daily Caller: 8.5%Biased Writer Voice46.5%This article: 14.0%Mary Rooke: 4.8%The Daily Caller: 3.6%Indoctrination14.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 2.2%The Daily Caller: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Rooke: 6.8%The Daily Caller: 5.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 33.7%Mary Rooke: 2.5%The Daily Caller: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…33.7%

86 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker27%attributed speech63writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 11 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
23 attributed words100% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%40.0%80.0%Quote-first Misdirection-31.5 ptsWriter: 79.4%Donald Trump: 47.8%47.8%Biased Writer Voice-63.5 ptsWriter: 63.5%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+52.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 52.2%52.2%Unattributed Quote+47.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 47.8%47.8%Attempt to Sell a Product -46.0 ptsWriter: 46.0%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.