INGERSOLL: Drink Your Beer, Be Merry. But Get Fired Up, There’s A War To Be Won 87%

By Geoffrey Ingersoll0%

7/2/2026, 7:03:52 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Indoctrination, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 37.2% saturation with 256 hits. Analysis detected 2,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 688 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 79% and a BS Rank of 87% (2,996 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 86.30% of the article peer group.

Socialism is sweeping across the country, and it’ll be the end of us if we don’t act. 
Mamdani isn’t just planning to seize housing  remember, rent freeze first, then seize  he’s nationalized the thermostats. 
Nothing says decline like telling people to keep their air conditioners near 80 degrees during a seismic, potentially life-altering heat wave. 
On July 4 weekend no less. 
NYC isn’t it either. 
Chicago, Seattle, Washington, Colorado. 
Certainly California. 
Washington, DC. 
We are going to see a flat out socialist governor soon. 
They’re on the move, and they’re moving on up. 
The worst part perhaps is the apathy I feel emanating off my fellow conservatives. 
Do you know or even remember that conservatives used to run Hollywood? 
Quentin Tarantino remembered the time fondly and nostalgically with his recent “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood.” 
It featured Leonardo DiCaprio, the global warming hystericist, spitting the phrase “dirty hippie” like an epithet. 
Ronald Reagan used to be the president of the actors union. 
Reagan! 
Not long before that, if you even had a friend suspected of being a communist, you’d be blacklisted. 
Now they’re giving Academy Awards to hifi Hollywood movies that encourage acts of domestic terrorism on immigration law enforcement. 
Yale and Harvard used to be factories of highly competent, ultra-aggressive right-wing WASPs ready to exert American hegemony. 
Now Harvard’s nom de guerre is “Joy Reid” or “Claudine Gay,” take your pick. 
All this happened with stunning speed, btw. 
Basically in one generation. 
Despite being students of history, my fellow conservatives seem to have forgotten that all those historic death tolls from communism also occurred in one generation. 
Talk to them about universities or public schools or cities or Hollywood and they just sort of shrug. 
It’s sad. 
Really? 
I think. 
You’re the progeny of the men who crossed the Delaware in a blizzard to massacre the Hessians? 
It’s time that we step up if we want to outlive those rock walls. 
As we cross the 250th, it’s time for us to regain a sense of civic duty. 
Take part in your local community. 
Exert your will over the local school curriculum. 
Raise hell at the city council meetings. 
In short: Show up. 
Late is fine. 
George was late to Trenton. 
He still won. 
The bottom line is that we can no longer cede ground as a lost cause. 
No ground is theirs. 
No ground is worth giving up. 
None. 
Their hallowed ground must be occupied. 
Their sacred cows must be slaughtered and consumed. 
And if we can’t take over their captured institutions, we’ll bring them down. 
It’s not enough to draw a line in the sand. 
Like George, we have to cross it. 
We have to go on offense. 
Julius Caesar famously and literally crossed the Rubicon in 49BC, causing a civil war in Rome. 
(This is where we get the phrase, cross the rubicon.) 
In so doing, he brought to a head the rank corruption, dysfunction and civil strife of the late Roman Republic. 
His victory, while tragic in the end, also contributed significantly to Pax Romana. 
Two hundred years of peace and prosperity, without which, consequently, the spread of Christianity would have been all but impossible. 
Much like George and the Delaware, that one act contributed materially to development of the west as we know it. 
Neither would have happened if they just threw up their hands and said, oh to hell with it. 
So on your 250th, take a beat to remember your forefathers, Roman and American alike, and the cajones it took to make us what we are today. 
They are our forebears. 
We should act like it. 
MORE LINKS 
ROOKE: SCOTUS Flips The Bird To Young Americans 
A wild week at the Supreme Court. 
Colorado Rebellion Is A Far Bigger Blow To Democrats Than Commie Corridor Losses 
The socialism effect is rippling. 
The Real Reasons Democrats Are Revolting And Why Conservatism Inc. 
Needs To Wake Up 
Here’s why potentially. 
Democrat City Boasts Of July 4 Tyranny, Bans Fireworks And Even Sparklers 
My backyard. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.8%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.7%The Daily Caller: 5.0%Confirmation Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 1.7%The Daily Caller: 2.7%Availability Heuristic4.5%This article: 2.9%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.7%The Daily Caller: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic2.9%This article: 1.9%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 2.2%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Hindsight Bias1.9%This article: 5.2%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 2.3%The Daily Caller: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 5.7%The Daily Caller: 10.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 7.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 2.3%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Loss Aversion7.0%This article: 2.3%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.6%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Status Quo Bias2.3%This article: 2.6%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.7%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect2.6%This article: 0.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 2.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 2.4%The Daily Caller: 2.5%Pessimism Bias4.1%This article: 32.6%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 14.0%The Daily Caller: 8.2%Negativity Bias32.6%This article: 0.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.5%The Daily Caller: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.7%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 4.9%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 1.2%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias4.9%This article: 8.9%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 5.0%The Daily Caller: 1.8%In-Group Bias8.9%This article: 4.8%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 3.9%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.8%This article: 2.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 1.2%The Daily Caller: 1.6%Halo Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.6%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 1.2%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Recency Bias2.0%This article: 8.4%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 2.1%The Daily Caller: 0.6%Primacy Effect8.4%This article: 0.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 4.3%The Daily Caller: 1.1%Ad Hominem4.2%This article: 4.5%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 5.1%The Daily Caller: 1.3%Straw Man4.5%This article: 3.9%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 3.0%The Daily Caller: 4.6%Appeal to Authority3.9%This article: 12.4%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 6.8%The Daily Caller: 2.9%False Dilemma12.4%This article: 7.7%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 7.0%The Daily Caller: 2.4%Slippery Slope7.7%This article: 0.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 24.1%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 16.5%The Daily Caller: 6.3%Hasty Generalization24.1%This article: 0.9%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.2%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Red Herring0.9%This article: 1.3%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.3%The Daily Caller: 1.0%Bandwagon1.3%This article: 37.2%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 14.2%The Daily Caller: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion37.2%This article: 9.2%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 2.3%The Daily Caller: 2.1%Begging the Question9.2%This article: 22.2%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 6.3%The Daily Caller: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)22.2%This article: 0.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.8%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.7%The Daily Caller: 0.9%Burden of Proof2.8%This article: 0.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.6%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.9%The Daily Caller: 0.4%Composition/Division3.6%This article: 12.6%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 4.0%The Daily Caller: 1.5%Anecdotal12.6%This article: 2.5%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.6%The Daily Caller: 0.0%No True Scotsman2.5%This article: 3.1%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.8%The Daily Caller: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.1%This article: 0.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 2.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.9%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.2%The Daily Caller: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.9%This article: 16.6%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 8.1%The Daily Caller: 8.5%Biased Writer Voice16.6%This article: 30.5%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 26.4%The Daily Caller: 3.6%Indoctrination30.5%This article: 0.0%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 0.0%The Daily Caller: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 18.1%The Daily Caller: 5.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias4.7%This article: 4.5%Geoffrey Ingersoll: 1.1%The Daily Caller: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.5%

688 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker2.5%attributed speech671writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageQuentin Tarantino • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Quentin Tarantino

100%flagged-word coverage
17 attributed words100% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Indoctrination-31.3 ptsWriter: 31.3%Quentin Tarantino: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-17.0 ptsWriter: 17.0%Quentin Tarantino: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -4.8 ptsWriter: 4.8%Quentin Tarantino: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.6 ptsWriter: 4.6%Quentin Tarantino: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-0.9 ptsWriter: 0.9%Quentin Tarantino: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.