BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 35.8% saturation with 195 hits. Analysis detected 710 faulty-reasoning hits from 545 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.6% and a BS Rank of 14% (17,746 of 20,518 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 86.50% of the article peer group.

Anticipating the 250th anniversary of America’s Declaration of Independence, speaker of the House of Representatives Mike Johnson recalled: “We boldly proclaimed the self-evident truth that our rights do not come from government, they come from God Himself.” 
In 2018, President Trump likewise declared: “Our rights are not given to us by man; our rights come from our Creator.” 
And defence secretary Pete Hegseth recently stated: “Today we gather to recognize that our rights here in this great country come from a loving and benevolent God, not government.” 
But the US Constitution—the repository of those rights—makes no mention of God. 
Its authority derives from “We the people.” 
God’s absence was a considered and deliberate omission, not an oversight. 
Luther Martin, a delegate to the original Constitutional Convention, reported that those who regarded the United States as a “Christian country” were an “unfashionable” minority who did not prevail against the “great majority”: 
> The part of the system which provides, that <em>no religious test</em> shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States, was adopted by a great majority of the convention, and without much debate; however, there were some members <em>so unfashionable</em> as to think, that a <em>belief of the existence of a Deity,</em> and of a <em>state of future rewards and punishments</em> would be some security for the good conduct of our rulers, and that, in a Christian country, it would be <em>at least decent</em> to hold out some distinction between the professors of Christianity and downright infidelity or paganism. 
Since God does not appear in the Constitution, people like Johnson and Hegseth tend to point to the Declaration of Independence, which famously stipulates: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” 
This text, they claim, established the United States as a nation “under God.” 
(Lincoln, by the way, may well <em>not</em> have used those words at Gettysburg. 
They do not appear in either the Nicolay copy of the speech, from which he read, or the Hay copy, which he wrote shortly afterwards as a record. 
Given that they disrupt the rhythm of “that this nation shall have a new birth of freedom,” it could be that these two words were a third-party interpolation, most likely by the AP reporter whose version was widely disseminated.) 
The Declaration of Independence was largely written by Thomas Jefferson, who then took it to a five-person committee charged by the Continental Congress with writing it. 
Several amendments were made, some of which were attributed to John Adams and Benjamin Franklin, and some of which Jefferson protested. 
To understand the intent of the Declaration, at least in the mind of its primary author, recall that Jefferson was a deist rather than a Christian. 
As such, he regarded “God” as a remote and largely unknowable entity that did not intervene in human affairs. 
Indeed, he advised his young nephew Peter Carr to “Question with boldness even the existence of God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.8%Coel Hellier: 5.9%Quillette: 5.9%Confirmation Bias10.8%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 3.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 1.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 16.0%Coel Hellier: 5.3%Quillette: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias16.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 4.3%Quillette: 7.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 1.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 9.2%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 35.8%Coel Hellier: 11.9%Quillette: 1.8%In-Group Bias35.8%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 2.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 2.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.8%Quillette: 2.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.0%Coel Hellier: 6.9%Quillette: 5.4%Appeal to Authority16.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.7%Quillette: 2.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.4%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 19.8%Coel Hellier: 9.0%Quillette: 9.1%Hasty Generalization19.8%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 16.0%Coel Hellier: 5.3%Quillette: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion16.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.4%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.7%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 2.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 5.3%Quillette: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 13.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 16.0%Coel Hellier: 5.3%Quillette: 1.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias16.0%This article: 0.0%Coel Hellier: 0.0%Quillette: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

545 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers48%attributed speech281writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMike Johnson • 37 words • 100.0% coveragePresident Trump • 21 words • 100.0% coveragePete Hegseth • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageLuther Martin • 33 words • 0.0% coverageLuther Martin • 108 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 59 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Jefferson • 36 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mike Johnson

100%flagged-word coverage
37 attributed words14% of attributed speech21% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mike Johnson: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.