Army Women Are More Likely to Be Killed by Army Men Than by War 34%

By Daniel Johnson0% Austin Campbell58%

6/30/2026, 9:59:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 475 hits. Analysis detected 3,638 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,359 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.9% and a BS Rank of 34% (14,563 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the article peer group.

Twenty-three-year-old Sarah Roque had been in the Army for just over four years when a man fatally shot her in the head. 
Roque wasn’t in a war zone, and the killer wasn’t an enemy combatant. 
It was Wooster Rancy, a fellow soldier stationed at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, who had gone to Walmart for trash bags on the last day Roque was seen alive in October 2024. 
The Army found her body in a dumpster behind the barracks. 
“Even now, I still can’t believe it,” her mother, Ana Roque, told The Intercept. 
“That murderers could exist in one of the supposedly safest places in the country.” 
A first-of-its-kind analysis by The Intercept found that in the Army, women are more likely to be killed by their fellow service members than by enemy combatants, in a reversal of the threat soldiers are trained to face. 
Between 2011 and August 2025, at least 41 women died by homicide in the Army  more than half of them at the hands of other service members or veterans. 
Using Defense Department manpower data to calculate per capita death rates, The Intercept found that active-duty Army women face a higher risk of homicide than male soldiers, the opposite of national and global trends. 
In many cases, women in the Army are killed by current or former romantic partners. 
Over 70 percent of victims had an intimate relationship with the perpetrator at one point, and the rate of homicides among women soldiers from intimate partner violence is at least three times higher than the national average. 
In others, like Roque’s case, it’s unclear how male soldiers chose their victims. 
“There was no connection between Sarah and Rancy. 
They never spoke, never texted, and their paths never crossed,” said Ana Roque. 
Given that Rancy was convicted of murder in February, Roque added, “I can’t complain about the prosecutors, they did their job. 
But my grievance is that they didn’t push to uncover the truth behind why he did it.’” 
Research points to the military’s hypermasculine culture, which historically devalues women, as a contributing factor to high rates of violence against them. 
But the existing scholarship is insufficient, said Erin Siegal McIntyre, a journalism professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill who has spent years digging into the hidden structures of militarized institutions. 
“There’s no way to know how bad the problem really is," Siegal McIntyre said. 
“There is an abysmal amount of data collected on domestic violence perpetrated by law enforcement officers, for example, many of whom are former military.” 
Analyzing over 14 years of Defense Department death data obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, The Intercept’s investigation is the first to compare rates of violence against women in the Army to factors like duty location, jobs, and relationships with perpetrators. 
The FOIA data also reveals deaths not previously announced by the Army and the Department of Defense. 
Violence against women in the military also appears to take a mental toll. 
In addition to the 41 women who died by homicide, another 128 died by suicide, the majority of them lower-ranking enlisted soldiers. 
From 2011 to 2024, the last complete year of data, homicide and suicide rates for women in the Army were double their equivalents for women nationwide. 
The Army doesn’t make any of this public, and the Intercept’s investigation has found flaws in what data collection currently occurs: Homicide and suicide death rates are not separated by gender or calculated per capita, preventing deeper analysis and comparison. 
There’s also nothing publicly accessible on how many homicides are committed by service members, who their victims are, or where homicides occurred. 
The Defense Department’s annual suicide report doesn’t note how many of the deceased had experiences with sexual assault or harassment. 
Meanwhile, systems meant to protect women are being rolled back and dismantled. 
In September, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth eliminated the Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services. 
It had existed for nearly 75 years, focusing on issues including sexual harassment and assault. 
In January, he ordered a six-month review of women in combat roles. 
In April, a woman who had been a whistleblower on sexual harassment within the Army Special Operations community was accused of sharing classified information and arrested by the FBI. 
Hegseth has also intervened to block the promotions of women officers. 
In a statement to The Intercept, a spokesperson for the Army denied that its protections were insufficient. 
“The Army has several programs and policies to protect service members who experience sexual assault or domestic violence,” said Army spokesperson Heather Hagan. 
When Spc. 
Mayra Diaz was assaulted on the Army base at Fort Hood, Texas, she was lucky to survive. 
Diaz was blindfolded, with her hands bound over her head, having water poured on her face  “waterboarding me and causing me to choke,” Diaz later wrote. 
Her attacker “then wrapped a cord around my neck in an attempt to kill me.” 
The assailant was a superior, Sgt. 
Greville Clarke, who knocked on her door at the barracks before threatening her with a pistol and raping her during the attack. 
The Army knew two other women had been assaulted at the barracks in similar attacks; officials chose not to issue a public warning, citing concerns about compromising the investigation and causing potential panic. 
The problems of homicide and suicide among women in the Army are inextricable from the prevalence of sexual assault. 
In some cases, like Diaz’s, a sexual attack involves an attempt on a woman’s life. 
Rape and sexual abuse are known to be detrimental to mental health, increasing the risk of suicide or self harm. 
“There’s a huge correlation between sexual assault and suicide rates,” said Josh Connolly, senior vice president of Protect Our Defenders, an advocacy group for victims of military sexual trauma. 
“It’s unambiguous  sexual assault rates are higher than in the civilian world.” 
Male soldiers faced a smaller increase in suicide rates compared to civilian men than Army women did compared to civilian women, and men in the Army have a lower risk of dying by homicide than their non-military counterparts. 
In fact, The Intercept’s investigation found, suicide is the leading cause of death of Army women. 
Some cases have made national headlines, such as the March 2023 death of Pvt. 
Ana Basaldua Ruiz at Fort Hood, who took her own life at 20 years old after reporting sexual harassment. 
For Ruiz’s family, the timing of her death raised troubling questions, echoing fellow Fort Hood soldier Vanessa Guillén’s infamous 2020 murder by an Army specialist. 
A subsequent Army inquiry into Ruiz’s case, reported by Telemundo, pointed to a “persistently toxic culture permissive of harassment.” 
Years earlier, in the wake of Guillén’s death, an independent review revealed “a total disregard and disrespect for female soldiers.” 
Investigators issued 70 recommendations, including a sweeping overhaul of the military’s sexual harassment and assault prevention programs. 
But the violence didn’t stop. 
Women at Fort Hood continued to experience a grim roll call of harm: Homicide. 
Sexual assault. 
Suicides. 
Three deaths at Fort Hood were never reported publicly by the Army but appeared in the data obtained by The Intercept. 
Counting Guillén and Ruiz, there were nine fatalities from homicide or suicide among women stationed at the base in five years. 
The Defense Department’s most recent suicide report does not provide data on how many suicide decedents experienced sexual trauma, although the Pentagon has provided this data in previous years. 
From 2001 to 2023, nearly 1 in 4 women service members experienced sexual assault, according to the Brown University’s Costs of War project, much higher than the numbers annually reported by the Pentagon. 
Research identifies those experiences as a key driver of suicide risk. 
Over the past two decades, suicide rates among women veterans have risen faster than among men. 
In Diaz’s view, institutional failures were a key factor in her assault. 
“Because the Army took no action to address the string of female soldiers attacked in their barracks,” Diaz wrote in a federal tort claim, “Sergeant Clarke was empowered to continue preying on the female soldiers at Fort Hood, including me.” 
Clarke assaulted five women before he was apprehended October 2022 and convicted in 2025 of charges including attempted premeditated murder. 
He died by suicide in custody. 
Diaz was “in a U.S. 
Army base in a locked barracks, opening the door to someone in uniform. 
It was very reasonable for her to think that that was a safe thing to do,” Christine Dunn, an attorney representing Diaz, told The Intercept. 
“You don’t expect someone who’s in a uniform to be a serial predator.” 
Diaz wrote that leadership denied repeated requests to move her into family housing off-post, and only after she and her sexual assault representative made clear that remaining in the barracks was “an untenable environment” was she finally allowed to leave. 
“I suffered from extreme paranoia, exacerbated by my attacker remaining at large,” Diaz wrote. 
“I abused alcohol in an attempt to forget what happened to me. 
 I began going to weekly therapy but have stopped going because I still find the attack very traumatizing to talk about.” 
The Army did not provide comment on Diaz’s case or reports of Clarke’s predation specifically. 
The anxiety, Diaz wrote, has never fully gone away. 
“What happened to me was a result of the United States Department of the Army’s and the Department of Defense’s negligence,” her complaint stated. 
“It was entirely preventable.” 
In response to questions from The Intercept, the Army acknowledged having recorded more homicides than were noted in the dataset provided based on The Intercept’s FOIA request. 
Between 2021 and 2023, the Army recorded a total of 16 homicides among active-duty women, Hagan told The Intercept. 
The data provided to The Intercept for its FOIA request counts only nine. 
Hagan did not respond to follow-up questions on the discrepancy, and the Army did not provide data outside the years 2021 to 2023. 
But the additional homicides would make the disparities found by The Intercept’s investigation even wider. 
If the same pattern of undercounting extends across the full 14-year span of our data, the true toll could be substantially higher. 
After the independent review of Fort Hood following Guillén’s killing, Hagan said, the Army “implemented a series of major reforms to strengthen prevention, reporting, and accountability for sexual harassment and assault.” 
It shifted its criminal investigations division to civilian leadership, requiring more independent investigations, establishing stricter missing-soldier response protocols, and expanding data-driven oversight of cases. 
But the deaths have continued, including another homicide at Hood last year. 
To advocates, there are other solutions to address these failures. 
“You have to call DoD into Congress and demand answers on why progress hasn’t been made,” said Connolly. 
“Congress could scrutinize the data on domestic violence and other issues. 
They can appropriate more resources to DV investigations and hold hearings.” 
“The potential solution lies with how funding is or isn’t tied to oversight,” Siegal McIntyre said. 
“Without Congress doing its job, nothing can change.” 
Rep. 
Chrissy Houlahan, D-Pa., a House Armed Services Committee member and Air Force veteran, said The Intercept’s findings reflect a broader failure of leadership and oversight. 
“This report is staggering, and unfortunately, unsurprising,” she said. 
“Servicewomen consistently bear the brunt of harassment, assault, retaliation, and systemic failures within the ranks, and it is costing them their careers, their safety, and in far too many cases, their lives.” 
In a 1995 Defense Department study on homicide victims by gender, female service members across active-duty branches were killed at higher rates than both their male counterparts and women nationally. 
A Marine Corps and Navy-specific study covering 1995 to 1999 found similarly elevated risks. 
The Pentagon never did further analysis. 
Ana Roque believes that change would fundamentally start with how the military builds itself to protect women like her daughter. 
“I understand that the country needs soldiers, but recruiters need to be more careful regarding where these individuals come from,” Roque said. 
She called for more police and camera surveillance on bases, arguing that if it had been present, “they could have seen him moving my daughter’s body in broad daylight.” 
She wishes she could have her daughter back. 
“She always had a smile, no matter how difficult her day was,” Roque said. 
“She made time to help colleagues with various issues and never said no. 
I have many stories written in my notebook from soldiers and civilians who knew her and told me, ‘She saved me,’ simply by taking a minute to listen to them. 
She loved her family; we would talk three times a day: at 7 a.m., during my lunch break, and at night, when she would always say ‘Good night, Mommy.’” 
How we analyzed the data 
Reporters working for The Intercept submitted Freedom of Information Act requests to the Pentagon seeking data on all U.S. 
Army active-duty noncombat deaths from 2011 through August 2025. 
In response, the Department of Defense provided a spreadsheet detailing 5,285 U.S. 
Army deaths over the 14-year period categorized by rank, gender, military occupation, and cause of death. 
The latter was classified as either illness, self-inflicted, accident, pending, or undetermined. 
To calculate the per capita suicide and death rates for women in the U.S. 
Army in this time period, The Intercept pulled manpower data from the Defense Department for each year in our analysis to provide the total number of women in the Army. 
National and international data on homicide and suicide was pulled from the FBI Crime Data Report, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in order to compare suicide and homicide rates. 
There is no publicly available equivalent data for Army veterans, nor has such an analysis been done for the Navy, Air Force, or Marines. 
The 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline offers 24-hour support for those experiencing suicidal thoughts or for those close to them, by chat, text, or telephone. 
Service members can dial 988 and press 1 to reach the Military and Veterans Crisis Line. 
Support is free and confidential. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.4%Daniel Johnson: 2.8%The Intercept: 5.3%Confirmation Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.4%The Intercept: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Daniel Johnson: 2.6%The Intercept: 3.0%Availability Heuristic5.9%This article: 5.6%Daniel Johnson: 1.4%The Intercept: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic5.6%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Daniel Johnson: 1.5%The Intercept: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias4.7%This article: 2.8%Daniel Johnson: 6.1%The Intercept: 9.2%Framing Effect2.8%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.9%Daniel Johnson: 1.0%The Intercept: 0.4%Status Quo Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.5%Daniel Johnson: 0.4%The Intercept: 1.0%Optimism Bias1.5%This article: 4.4%Daniel Johnson: 1.5%The Intercept: 2.2%Pessimism Bias4.4%This article: 19.8%Daniel Johnson: 7.2%The Intercept: 12.3%Negativity Bias19.8%This article: 2.2%Daniel Johnson: 0.6%The Intercept: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias2.2%This article: 1.7%Daniel Johnson: 0.4%The Intercept: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error1.7%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Daniel Johnson: 0.6%The Intercept: 1.7%In-Group Bias2.3%This article: 0.9%Daniel Johnson: 0.2%The Intercept: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.9%This article: 2.4%Daniel Johnson: 0.6%The Intercept: 1.0%Halo Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.7%Daniel Johnson: 0.2%The Intercept: 1.3%Recency Bias0.7%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 2.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.4%Daniel Johnson: 5.9%The Intercept: 3.4%Appeal to Authority16.4%This article: 1.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.4%The Intercept: 2.0%False Dilemma1.0%This article: 2.3%Daniel Johnson: 0.6%The Intercept: 1.7%Slippery Slope2.3%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.2%Daniel Johnson: 5.1%The Intercept: 7.2%Hasty Generalization9.2%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.3%The Intercept: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 20.1%Daniel Johnson: 10.9%The Intercept: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion20.1%This article: 2.8%Daniel Johnson: 0.9%The Intercept: 1.4%Begging the Question2.8%This article: 9.8%Daniel Johnson: 2.6%The Intercept: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.8%This article: 0.7%Daniel Johnson: 0.2%The Intercept: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.7%This article: 2.3%Daniel Johnson: 0.6%The Intercept: 0.7%Burden of Proof2.3%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.9%Daniel Johnson: 3.0%The Intercept: 2.3%Anecdotal7.9%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.0%Daniel Johnson: 2.7%The Intercept: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.6%Daniel Johnson: 0.1%The Intercept: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.6%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 2.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.7%Daniel Johnson: 0.4%The Intercept: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection1.7%This article: 2.3%Daniel Johnson: 2.1%The Intercept: 10.5%Biased Writer Voice2.3%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.6%The Intercept: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.4%The Intercept: 6.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Johnson: 0.0%The Intercept: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Daniel Johnson: 0.5%The Intercept: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.9%

2359 words analyzed.

Speakers

9speakers37%attributed speech1,480writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAna Roque • 14 words • 100.0% coverageAna Roque • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAna Roque • 8 words • 0.0% coverageAna Roque • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAna Roque • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAna Roque • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageErin Siegal McIntyre • 34 words • 0.0% coverageErin Siegal McIntyre • 14 words • 0.0% coverageErin Siegal McIntyre • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageArmy • 17 words • 0.0% coverageHeather Hagan • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMayra Diaz • 27 words • 100.0% coverageMayra Diaz • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Connolly • 29 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Connolly • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMayra Diaz • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMayra Diaz • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMayra Diaz • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMayra Diaz • 13 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Dunn • 25 words • 0.0% coverageChristine Dunn • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMayra Diaz • 40 words • 0.0% coverageMayra Diaz • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMayra Diaz • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMayra Diaz • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMayra Diaz • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageHeather Hagan • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageHeather Hagan • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Connolly • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Connolly • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJosh Connolly • 11 words • 0.0% coverageErin Siegal McIntyre • 16 words • 0.0% coverageErin Siegal McIntyre • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageChrissy Houlahan • 25 words • 0.0% coverageChrissy Houlahan • 9 words • 0.0% coverageChrissy Houlahan • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAna Roque • 20 words • 0.0% coverageAna Roque • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAna Roque • 29 words • 0.0% coverageAna Roque • 8 words • 0.0% coverageAna Roque • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAna Roque • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAna Roque • 30 words • 0.0% coverageAna Roque • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverage988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline • 25 words • 100.0% coverage988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline • 16 words • 100.0% coverage988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline • 5 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Chrissy Houlahan

100%flagged-word coverage
66 attributed words7.5% of attributed speech77% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.6 ptsWriter: 3.6%Chrissy Houlahan: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.