Father of 4 kids found dead with mom, grandma in upstate NY speaks out 44%

By Jessica Schladebeck64%

6/27/2026, 7:09:08 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 703 faulty-reasoning hits from 367 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.2% and a BS Rank of 44% (11,918 of 21,171 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the article peer group.

The father of four children found dead in an upstate New York apartment earlier this week believes their mother and grandmother killed the kids, then died by suicide, to prevent them from traveling out of state to visit him. 
“It’s my speculation they did that together,” Brady Harmon told Spectrum News 1. 
“And all because they were going to spend 60 days with me.” 
The mourning father added that their upcoming trip to his home state of Utah would have been the first time he’d seen his children in more than six years. 
Officers on Tuesday responded to an apartment in Mechanicville, after receiving a phone call from a concerned neighbor who had not seen the family members in several days. 
Inside, they discovered the bodies of six people: 64-year-old Amy Steadman, her daughter, Sarah Myers, 44, and her grandchildren  Harper Harmon, 13, Hudson Harmon, 11, and 10-year-old twins Gavin Harmon and Gracelynn Harmon, Police Chief William Rabbitt told reporters at a press conference earlier this week. 
He said their bodies were decomposed and they had likely been dead for an “extended period of time” before they were found inside Steadman’s apartment. 
During the investigation, Rabbitt said authorities uncovered evidence, including a handwritten note, to suggest “Steadman was involved in the deaths.” 
However, police have not commented on whether Myers played a role in the killings, some of which appeared to be the result of “intentional poisoning.” 
One child also suffered “fatal sharp-force injuries,” Rabbitt said. 
“I have been fighting for so long to be able to have access to them, fighting so long to be part of their lives and show them there’s something different,” Harmon said. 
“Almost to that finish line, have my legs cut out from me and gutted because someone decided to take my kids away from me.” 
Harmon also revealed that he and Myers had long been estranged and engaged in an ongoing mediation process over the children. 
“I just feel so sorry,” he said, “I was not being able to give an opportunity to sit there and love my children and hug them one more time.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.8%Jessica Schladebeck: 6.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias6.8%This article: 6.8%Jessica Schladebeck: 1.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias6.8%This article: 5.4%Jessica Schladebeck: 5.3%newyorkdailynews: 3.3%Availability Heuristic5.4%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 7.2%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 15.8%Jessica Schladebeck: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion15.8%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.7%Jessica Schladebeck: 3.7%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias8.7%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 24.8%Jessica Schladebeck: 10.5%newyorkdailynews: 9.7%Negativity Bias24.8%This article: 29.2%Jessica Schladebeck: 2.0%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias29.2%This article: 5.7%Jessica Schladebeck: 3.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error5.7%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 4.0%newyorkdailynews: 4.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.4%Jessica Schladebeck: 5.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority5.4%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 4.3%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 5.7%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring5.7%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 31.1%Jessica Schladebeck: 9.3%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion31.1%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.3%Jessica Schladebeck: 2.5%newyorkdailynews: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.3%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 2.8%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.4%Jessica Schladebeck: 3.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.4%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.6%Jessica Schladebeck: 5.2%newyorkdailynews: 2.2%Unattributed Quote10.6%This article: 3.3%Jessica Schladebeck: 1.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection3.3%This article: 18.5%Jessica Schladebeck: 7.6%newyorkdailynews: 6.8%Biased Writer Voice18.5%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 2.5%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 2.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Schladebeck: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

367 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers63%attributed speech135writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageBrady Harmon • 13 words • 0.0% coverageBrady Harmon • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWilliam Rabbitt • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWilliam Rabbitt • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWilliam Rabbitt • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWilliam Rabbitt • 9 words • 0.0% coverageBrady Harmon • 32 words • 0.0% coverageBrady Harmon • 24 words • 0.0% coverageBrady Harmon • 21 words • 0.0% coverageBrady Harmon • 29 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Brady Harmon

100%flagged-word coverage
131 attributed words56% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Biased Writer Voice-50.4 ptsWriter: 50.4%Brady Harmon: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-28.9 ptsWriter: 28.9%Brady Harmon: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+9.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Brady Harmon: 9.2%9.2%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.