Mystery surrounds death of MMA fighter, mother of two found inside car at San Jose State University ⁠31%

By Daniel Farr⁠69%

6/27/2026, 12:18:27 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.6% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 512 faulty-reasoning hits from 275 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (14,099 of 20,371 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 69.20% of the article peer group.

A mystery continues to swirl around the deaths of a mixed martial arts fighter and a mother of two who were found unresponsive inside a parked car at a San Jose State University parking garage, as authorities continue to keep their causes of death under wraps. 
The Santa Clara County Medical Examiner's Office on Thursday identified the victims as Angelo Henry, 36, and Deziree Auelua-Misa, 30, weeks after the pair was discovered inside a vehicle in the university's West Garage at the corner of South Fourth and East San Salvador streets. 
The grim discovery unfolded on the afternoon of May 23 after concerns mounted when the pair remained motionless inside the parked car for hours. 
According to university police Capt. 
Jermaine Thomas, the vehicle had been spotted earlier in the day, but officers initially believed the occupants were sleeping. 
Authorities were only alerted after neither person appeared to move for several hours. 
Henry, a Seaside native from Monterey County, was known in the local combat sports community as both a mixed martial arts fighter and fight promoter. 
Auelua-Misa, also from Seaside, worked as a food and beverage manager at a hotel. 
Both victims were parents. 
A GoFundMe campaign created by Auelua-Misa's sister has raised more than $24,000 toward its $30,000 goal. 
According to the fundraiser, Auelua-Misa leaves behind two children, who will receive a portion of the donations. 
“As our family grieves her loss, we are also stepping in to make sure her babies are surrounded by love, stability, and support during this heartbreaking transition,” her sister wrote. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 3.7%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 1.3%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 4.7%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 9.1%Daniel Farr: 1.1%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic9.1%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.6%California Post: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.5%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 22.9%Daniel Farr: 12.8%California Post: 10.4%Framing Effect22.9%This article: 1.5%Daniel Farr: 1.2%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion1.5%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.9%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.8%Daniel Farr: 1.3%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 1.5%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 31.6%Daniel Farr: 17.6%California Post: 16.1%Negativity Bias31.6%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.9%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 1.5%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 6.9%Daniel Farr: 0.2%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 1.0%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.9%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 2.2%California Post: 3.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.5%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 1.7%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.4%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 2.2%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.2%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 3.1%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 1.5%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.7%California Post: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 4.0%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.7%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.5%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 27.6%Daniel Farr: 8.4%California Post: 9.0%Appeal to Emotion27.6%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.6%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.7%Daniel Farr: 2.3%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.7%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.7%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 2.0%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.1%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 16.7%Daniel Farr: 1.7%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)16.7%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.1%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.3%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.9%Daniel Farr: 2.5%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote10.9%This article: 10.9%Daniel Farr: 1.9%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection10.9%This article: 31.6%Daniel Farr: 12.4%California Post: 13.2%Biased Writer Voice31.6%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 1.6%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 0.3%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daniel Farr: 3.9%California Post: 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Daniel Farr: 0.7%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.8%

275 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers34%attributed speech181writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 100.0% coverageSanta Clara County Medical Examiner's Office • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJermaine Thomas • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageAuelua-Misa's sister • 30 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Auelua-Misa's sister

100%flagged-word coverage
30 attributed words32% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Auelua-Misa's sister: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Auelua-Misa's sister: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-48.1 ptsWriter: 48.1%Auelua-Misa's sister: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.8 ptsWriter: 8.8%Auelua-Misa's sister: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.