NPR84%

Chile's MAGA-inspired border control 53%

By John Bartlett0%

5/23/2026, 10:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 177 hits. Analysis detected 1,424 faulty-reasoning hits from 810 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.5% and a BS Rank of 53% (10,488 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the article peer group.

ARICA, Chile—Out on the wide open plain on Chile's northernmost coastline, dust billows in the cool breeze which sweeps across the pampa. 
In front of a row of concrete markers tracing the border with Peru, two sandy-yellow Chilean military excavators crawl along a deep trench, digging three metres down before swinging sharply to dump bucketloads of earth into a rising embankment. 
A few hundred yards across the pampa from where Chilean soldiers patrol the boundary, stern-faced, the Peruvian border police sit under wind-torn blue awnings, eyeing the Chileans warily. 
This barrier is newly inaugurated far-right President José Antonio Kast's answer to the migration crisis that propelled him to power in December's runoff election, where he won 58% of the vote. 
It also echoes President Trump's pledges to build a wall along the U.S.–Mexico border, a key element of his immigration agenda. 
During the campaign, Kast regularly threatened the 336,000 migrants living illegally in Chile, according to official estimates, with expulsion. 
So far, he has deported just 40 people on a single outbound flight. 
"We want to use excavators to build a sovereign Chile… which has been undermined by illegal immigration, drug trafficking, and organized crime," he declared on a visit to this frontier just five days after assuming the presidency. 
Kast, an ultra-conservative Catholic father-of-nine, has made a career on the extreme fringes of Chilean politics with his hardline views. 
Over the last five years, he has made illegal immigration  and the public security fears which have accompanied it  his battleflag, drawing comparisons to President Trump. 
"We have made 53.6% progress, which means about six kilometres in this area," says Cristián Sayes, President Kast's delegate in this, Chile's northernmost administrative region. 
"The ultimate goal is to have constant control of the border so that we can stop illegal migration once and for all, but also confront drug trafficking, smuggling, and human trafficking," said Sayes. 
This ditch will be 11 kilometres long. 
Another, higher up in the mountains, will stretch for seven kilometres, and further south on the border with Bolivia, two more ditches are being dug. 
Tank traps dug during a time of heightened political tensions in the 1970s strafe the landscape either side of the highway, and a section of desert along from where the trench is being dug is still laid with anti-tank mines from the era. 
In March, Kast flew up to Arica, the sleepy desert town on the border with Peru, to announce the initiation of his 'border shield' plan. 
The plan aims to seal vulnerable stretches of the 1,200-kilometre border Chile shares with Peru and Bolivia across its three northernmost regions in the Atacama Desert.The first phase includes several short trench sections along the most exposed parts of the frontier. 
Surveillance equipment will follow in the next phase, while the original proposal also called for five-metre walls in some areas. 
"In addition to ditches, fences and walls, there will be thermal and infrared cameras, sensors, radars and drones with facial recognition cameras  all operating 24 hours a day," explained Sayes. 
But the wave of illegal migration across this border may already be a thing of the past as illegal entries have been steadily declining. 
"In 2024, we had around 2,460 attempts, but in 2025, there was a significant decrease to 1,746," said Prefect Inspector José Contreras Hernández, the regional head of Chile's investigative police force. 
"The most significant increase we have seen is actually in attempts by people to leave or try to leave the national territory irregularly," says Contreras Hernández, attributing the exodus to migration policies and the change of government. 
Already in the first four months of this year, border patrols have thwarted nearly 500 attempts to leave the country illegally in Arica y Parinacota  compared to just 33 in the whole of 2024. 
Sayes says that the border deterrents will be continuously reviewed: "This is a constant and dynamic job, we will have to keep an eye on where traffickers and contrabandists are crossing, and we will have to maintain the trench so that it doesn't crumble or fill with sand." 
Already, two Bolivian citizens were detained on another section of the border trench for trying to fill in the ditch to make it passable. 
Entering the country illegally is not a crime in Chile, and the Kast government has already sent two bills to congress which would criminalise illegal entry, as well as limit immigrants' access to social security benefits. 
Yet doubts remain over whether digging ditches along short stretches of Chile's more than 4,800 miles of porous borders will do much to curb the flow of migrants, drugs, or contraband. 
And with desert winds already blowing sand back into the trenches, the question is no longer just how far this barrier will extend  but whether it will stop anyone at all. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.9%John Bartlett: 4.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Confirmation Bias15.9%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%John Bartlett: 3.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.8%Availability Heuristic3.8%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.7%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 2.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%John Bartlett: 8.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.1%Framing Effect9.6%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.9%John Bartlett: 1.5%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Status Quo Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.1%John Bartlett: 2.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.4%Optimism Bias8.1%This article: 12.5%John Bartlett: 7.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Pessimism Bias12.5%This article: 21.9%John Bartlett: 7.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 11.3%Negativity Bias21.9%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 1.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%John Bartlett: 2.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.5%This article: 2.5%John Bartlett: 0.6%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Halo Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%John Bartlett: 1.1%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.7%Recency Bias4.3%This article: 3.8%John Bartlett: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Primacy Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%John Bartlett: 1.9%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.2%Ad Hominem2.5%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.8%John Bartlett: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.1%Appeal to Authority3.8%This article: 11.9%John Bartlett: 3.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%False Dilemma11.9%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.9%John Bartlett: 4.8%Goats and Soda (NPR): 4.4%Hasty Generalization5.9%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.8%John Bartlett: 4.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 6.6%Appeal to Emotion8.8%This article: 8.6%John Bartlett: 2.2%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Begging the Question8.6%This article: 15.9%John Bartlett: 6.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)15.9%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.8%John Bartlett: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.4%Burden of Proof3.8%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.1%John Bartlett: 3.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.1%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.7%John Bartlett: 2.4%Goats and Soda (NPR): 3.1%Biased Writer Voice2.7%This article: 4.1%John Bartlett: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.0%Indoctrination4.1%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 8.3%Goats and Soda (NPR): 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%John Bartlett: 1.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%John Bartlett: 0.0%Goats and Soda (NPR): 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

810 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers30%attributed speech568writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJosé Antonio Kast • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageCristián Sayes • 25 words • 0.0% coverageCristián Sayes • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageCristián Sayes • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageJosé Contreras Hernández • 31 words • 0.0% coverageJosé Contreras Hernández • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageCristián Sayes • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

José Antonio Kast

100%flagged-word coverage
37 attributed words15% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Politically Right Leaning -5.5 ptsWriter: 5.5%José Antonio Kast: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.9 ptsWriter: 3.9%José Antonio Kast: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.