The Intercept81%
LAPD Deployed Drones to Spy on No Kings Protest 91%
By Sam Biddle82%
4/20/2026, 12:42:50 PM
Topics: Chilling Dissent
BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 40% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 2,571 faulty-reasoning hits from 835 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 84.4% and a BS Rank of 91% (2,033 of 21,168 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 90.40% of the article peer group.
The Los Angeles Police Department deployed drones intended for public safety uses to surveil a No Kings rally and a protest against the Trump administration’s anti-immigrant campaign, flight data reveals.
Last year, the LAPD launched its “Drone as First Responder” program with a clearly articulated goal: to protect and even save lives.
The pilot program authorized the rapid deployment of drones to the scenes of certain emergency calls before human officers even arrive.
After receiving a 911 call, authorities can dispatch a drone to get a better picture of what’s happening from the sky, potentially reducing the number of officers dispatched.
This means police resources could, theoretically, be more efficiently deployed to other emergencies around the city.
“This innovative program not only aims to enhance transparency in Department operations but also prioritizes the protection of individual privacy,” the LAPD explained in a webpage about the program.
“By deploying drones as an invaluable resource for patrol officers, the DFR Pilot Program provides a cutting-edge tool that can respond swiftly to emergencies, ensuring a safer environment for all.”
The LAPD turned to Skydio, a California-based drone startup that previously marketed its aircraft to consumers but has pivoted to supplying militarized, weapons-compatible hardware for the U.S.
Army, Israeli Defense Forces, and other governments.
The LAPD insists the DFR program presents no threat to personal privacy or civil liberties.
“Unless you are in the commission of a crime or under criminal investigation for the commission of a crime,” assures the website, “the officers utilizing the drone are not interested in recording you.”
But according to flight data shared publicly by the LAPD and Skydio, the city has used DFR not only to respond to emergencies, but also to monitor multiple protests across Los Angeles.
Software engineer and flight data researcher John Wiseman has tracked DFR aircraft to at least two protests in Los Angeles this year, he told The Intercept, raising questions as to whether the city is operating an aerial surveillance program against nonviolent, constitutionally protected activity.
Flight records show DFR drones were launched at least 31 times to surveil the January 31 “ICE Out” protest in downtown Los Angeles, which saw thousands peacefully march against the administration’s deportations raids and street violence in Minneapolis.
The Los Angeles Times said the “mostly peaceful protest took a turn as day turned to night in downtown Los Angeles and the crowd refused to disperse,” whereupon police began firing tear gas at remaining demonstrators.
At the March 28 “No Kings” protest against the Trump administration, city data shows the LAPD again launched drones 32 times over the area where the demonstration took place.
A heat map visualization created by Wiseman based on the city data shows the drones lingered for extended periods over the Metropolitan Detention Center and the intersection of North Central Avenue and East Temple Street in Los Angeles’s Little Tokyo neighborhood.
Following the protest, the city’s local ABC News affiliate reported the event “drew tens of thousands who listened to speakers before marching peacefully through downtown streets.”
The LAPD later arrested 75 individuals, 74 of whom were taken in simply for not dispersing when ordered by police.
The DFR flight data shows the drones began orbiting the protest at 2 p.m., hours before the order to disperse was issued at 5:30 p.m., and continued flying until 9 p.m. that evening.
Nine drone flights began before the dispersal order.
In response to questions about the protest surveillance, LAPD Lt.
Matthew Jacobs told The Intercept, “We do not document or record unless there is a crime occurring.”
“When it comes to a protest or demonstration, we’re responding [with drones] at the request of the Incident Commander,” Jacobs said.
“We’re looking for specific people, we’re not taping First Amendment activity.”
Jacobs added that “99 percent of the time” drones are sent to a protest “because the commander reports a crime in progress,” and claimed a “wide variety of crimes” are committed at protests, from vandalism to rocks thrown at officers.
Jacobs added at times the department simply “wants to see how big a crowd is.”
Jacobs did not answer when asked why drones were surveilling the No Kings protest hours before the dispersal order.
The police department did not answer a detailed list of follow-up questions, including how much protest-related data it has captured via drone surveillance to date or who monitors drone feeds over protests.
The LAPD’s fleet of Skydio X10 drones monitor the ground using with a sophisticated suite of sensors the company says are capable of detecting the presence of person from a distance of more than 8,000 feet and identifying an individual more than 2,500 feet away.
The company also touts the drone’s ability to read license plates from a distance of 800 feet.
Last year, Skydio CEO Adam Bry demonstrated how two police officers using the company’s DFR Command software could operate eight drones at once between them, tracking license plates and automatically following people of interest.
Speakers
6speakers41%attributed speech491writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageAdam Bry
34 attributed words9.9% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.