New York Post89%
Concerned SoCal woman reveals terrifying fallout from registering her pet Boxer to vote 51%
By Benjamin Brown0%
4/18/2026, 5:53:44 PM
Topics: Voter Fraud
BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 199 hits. Analysis detected 1,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 873 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (10,820 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the article peer group.
A California woman who registered her dog to vote says she did it to reform lax voting rules.
As the push for voter ID to stamp out voter fraud gains momentum, Laura Yourex registered her Boxer, Maya, to vote during the 2020 election, she says, to reveal vulnerabilities in the state’s voter registration system, a weakness critics have long warned about but say has gone largely unaddressed.
She thought it would lead to reform but instead has turned into a nightmare, with her now facing charges related to voter fraud.
It’s something lawmakers at both the state and federal level are working to address by requiring voter ID and proof of citizenship.
In Washington, the proposed SAVE Act would force Americans to prove their citizenship in person to register and show ID even for mail-in ballots.
Meanwhile in California, a Republican-backed ballot initiative aiming for 2026 would require photo ID for in-person voting and stricter verification for mail ballots.
“If somebody had looked at it, if somebody did something about it… but nobody cares,” Yourex told The Post, explaining that she immediately contacted election officials when her pet received a mail-in ballot.
The Orange County woman said she was first alarmed after six voter registration cards showed up at her home — despite only two eligible voters living there.
“I think that’s really what kind of set me off, we have two people living in this house — my husband and I — and we got six cards to register to vote,” she said.
“I was like, well, that’s ridiculous.”
So Yourex decided to “test” the system by seeing if she could register her dog and be sent a ballot.
“If you look at the actual form that I sent in, it’s literally a made-up name, made-up birthday, no Social Security number at all,” she said.
“The only thing that was real on it was my address.”
Weeks later, Maya received a mail-in ballot.
Yourex said she immediately contacted the Orange County Registrar of Voters to report what had happened, but claims no one responded.
She said she repeatedly tried to alert officials between 2020 and 2025, even reaching out to former Huntington Beach City Attorney Michael Gates through a friend.
“I’ve given my picture of Maya and her ballot, and given my phone number, and would never hear from anybody,” Yourex explained.
“I remember the first words out of my mouth when she said, ‘Hi, we’re looking into your dog being registered to vote.’
Literally, the first words out of my mouth were: ‘Thank God, finally, someone’s looking into this,’” Yourex said.
Instead, prosecutors hit her five charges, including a felony count of procuring or offering a false or forged document to be filed, two felony counts of casting a ballot when not entitled to vote, and a felony count of registering a non-existent person to vote.
Orange County officials said Maya was not not only registered to vote — but to cast ballots in the 2021 gubernatorial recall and the 2022 primary, though the latter was challenged and rejected.
On April 10, four of felony charges were dismissed while the remaining count of registering a nonexistent person was reduced to a misdemeanor.
“I really don’t feel like anybody wanted to do anything about it, but because of the way I went about bringing it to their attention, I don’t think they had a choice,” Yourex said.
Her sentencing is scheduled for October.
The case now sits at the center of a broader political battle over election security in California.
Under current state law, voters are not required to show ID when casting a ballot.
Identification is typically provided at the registration stage, while mail-in ballots rely on signature verification rather than photo ID.
Organizers behind the Republican-backed proposed statewide voter ID initiative say they have gathered more than 1.3 million signatures to qualify the measure for the 2026 ballot.
“There is fraud going on, you know, it may be small, but it doesn’t take a lot of votes to change the outcome of an election,” Riverside County Rep.
Ken Calvert told The Post.
“This is not a radical idea, Americans use an ID every day of their life.
This is something that just makes common sense.”
While election experts broadly agree voter fraud in the US is rare, the issue has become a touchstone point for the Trump administration.
Influencer Nick Shirley has drawn attention to voter fraud in California with viral videos claiming registrations are linked to everything from UPS stores to vacant buildings.
Yourex, who supports voter ID requirements, said she still believes in the system — but thinks it needs a review.
“The system itself, I think, is a good system but I think it just needs to have tighter regulations,” she said, adding that “seems like these officials are looking the other way.”
“You can’t stop what you don’t look for, right?”
she asked.
For her part, Yourex says she’s done trying to force change.
“I can’t change it, so I’m not going to think about it,” she said.
“I don’t spend a lot of time trying to think about things I don’t understand.”
Speakers
3speakers42%attributed speech509writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageKen Calvert
52 attributed words14% of attributed speech68% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.