CNBC⁠54%

CNBC Property Play ⁠90%

3/10/2026, 5:06:51 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Framing Effect, and Loss Aversion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 97.2% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 422 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 83.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (2,210 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 89.90% of the article peer group.

Follow and Listen Apple Podcasts Spotify Amazon Music IHeartRadio About CNBC Property Play CNBC Property Play with Diana Olick focuses on new and evolving opportunities for the real estate investor, from individuals to venture capitalists, private equity funds, family offices, institutional investors and large public companies. 
We cover all the sectors you'll need to shore up your portfolio: commercial and residential, finance and the mortgage markets, innovation in the industry and the growing risk to assets and operations from climate change. 
Property Play takes you inside the rooms where it's all happening with the industry leaders, dealmakers and experts shaping the future of real estate. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%CNBC: 4.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 32.4%CNBC: 6.5%Framing Effect32.4%This article: 32.4%CNBC: 0.8%Loss Aversion32.4%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 7.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 6.4%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 22.2%CNBC: 2.9%Halo Effect22.2%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 2.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 22.2%CNBC: 5.0%Appeal to Authority22.2%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 32.4%CNBC: 4.2%Hasty Generalization32.4%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 22.2%CNBC: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion22.2%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 1.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 97.2%CNBC: 3.7%Biased Writer Voice97.2%This article: 32.4%CNBC: 0.9%Indoctrination32.4%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 97.2%CNBC: 5.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…97.2%

108 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker2.8%attributed speech105writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
CNBC Property Play • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

CNBC Property Play

0%flagged-word coverage
3 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-100.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%CNBC Property Play: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -100.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%CNBC Property Play: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-33.3 ptsWriter: 33.3%CNBC Property Play: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.