CNBC⁠54%

CNBC Sport ⁠89%

1/15/2025, 6:47:10 PM

Topics: Podcasts

BS Summary: This article contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 96.7% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 190 faulty-reasoning hits from 61 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 82% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (2,471 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 88.70% of the article peer group.

Follow and Listen Apple Podcasts Spotify Amazon Music iHeartRadio About CNBC Sport CNBC Sport brings you the convergence of sports, business, and investing. 
Each week, we sit down with the biggest names in sports - from league commissioners and top athletes to team owners and influential executives - uncovering the strategies, deals, and inside stories shaping the industry's future. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%CNBC: 4.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 6.5%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 7.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 6.4%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 59.0%CNBC: 2.9%Halo Effect59.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 2.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 59.0%CNBC: 5.0%Appeal to Authority59.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 4.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 1.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 96.7%CNBC: 3.7%Biased Writer Voice96.7%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 96.7%CNBC: 5.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…96.7%

61 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker3.3%attributed speech59writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
CNBC Sport • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

CNBC Sport

0%flagged-word coverage
2 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-100.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%CNBC Sport: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -100.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%CNBC Sport: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.